Do you think more big name acts come to Ottawa because of a downtown arena? Or more fans go to a big name show because of a downtown arena?Honestly I don't really care about the politics behind it, a downtown arena just makes sense and it needs to get done. I will happily pay tax dollars if it comes to it.
This isn't just the Sens. I went to MTL for Drake last night and Toronto for the Weeknd like 6 months ago. I am tired of having to travel to see my favourite artists, selfishly. It's not like these guys are actively dodging Ottawa if they already have MTL and T.dot pencilled into their tours. Its because the arena is so far from civilization its hard to match the energy of other locations.
People travel domestically and internationally to these types of events and spend a lot of money.I don't see how the city wont make the funds they spend on this project back in tax revenues over time.
It is also about being a respectable major city. Such a clown show compared to Calgary, MTL, and Toronto where I can go and do anything after a game instead of being stuck in a f***ing parking lot. I don't know the situations in Winnipeg, Van, and Edmonton (never been to their arena) .
no clue tbh.
I believe that back in the early 2000's it was a factor, but the industry has changed the way it works since ticket master and Livenation merged back in 2010, and I no longer work with folks in the industry so I can't speak to the impact it's had.Do you think more big name acts come to Ottawa because of a downtown arena? Or more fans go to a big name show because of a downtown arena?
I'm happy to see the rink built downtown but I don't think it makes one but of difference in the bookings
When Melnyk listed the “partners” included in the new building project LiveNation was on the list. That would be key in getting the larger acts here. It would likely be a lot of midweek shows in between Toronto and Montreal shows.Do you think more big name acts come to Ottawa because of a downtown arena? Or more fans go to a big name show because of a downtown arena?
I'm happy to see the rink built downtown but I don't think it makes one but of difference in the bookings
There's a lot that's been written about the economics of touring in Canada, particularly recently. Maybe I'm off base but we've already got an 18000 seat arena. I'm not sure how having one in a different location changes the evonomicsWhen Melnyk listed the “partners” included in the new building project LiveNation was on the list. That would be key in getting the larger acts here. It would likely be a lot of midweek shows in between Toronto and Montreal shows.
The vast majority of Ottawa citizens are not 67s or Redblack fans, yet our taxes in part helped revitalize Landsdown park, and the 67s will soon have a new arena with help from the tax payer.The vast majority of Ottawa citizens don't go to sens games. I love the sens but do not want my taxes going to giving them somewhere to play. I could care less about concerts. I've seen the ones I've wanted and now I'm old and care more about not wasting money on things that don't add any value to my life.
To be fair I haven't worked in the industry in a while. I still do some business with LN still and an somewhat up to date.I believe that back in the early 2000's it was a factor, but the industry has changed the way it works since ticket master and Livenation merged back in 2010, and I no longer work with folks in the industry so I can't speak to the impact it's had.
In the end, in todays environment, it may be a chicken or the egg argument, as more fans showing up means bigger bands will want to come, and bigger bands coming will lead to more fans going to concerts.
I think @Silky Johnson might have some insight on the matter,
Who knew that trains not being able to handle being full was a thing?Imagine a downtown/Lebreton Arena, that depends heavily on the LRT to get people to and from games/events…. And this unreliable LRT system has to be shut down during the season… might influence where the new ownership group decides to build a new Arena
Who knew that trains not being able to handle being full was a thing?
It's really beyond comical at this point. Good on Ford for saying no money for 3 until 1&2 work."The train works fine. You never said ANYTHING about carrying passengers. Or operating in the winter. Or operating in the summer."
Will be interesting to see what they do for the Metrolinx line they've been building for ages now. I think they ordered the same cars to service that line so who knows what DoFo decides to do there. Already over budget and overdue, can't see how they can afford such unreliable cars on the tracks.It's really beyond comical at this point. Good on Ford for saying no money for 3 until 1&2 work.
I read the other day that the train wheels and the train rails aren't the same size. That's funny.
I expect at the end of the day that they'll end up with new rail cars and in court with Alstrom.
Boon/doggle depends what side of the trough you're standing on.What a boondoggle…… like perfect dictionary example….. And it keeps getting more doggleish…. Or boonish….
Apparently it used to be a more playful term referring to little side projects you would give a kid to do to practice a learned skill. A boy scout making a lanyard of practiced knots….Boon/doggle depends what side of the trough you're standing on.
I shared those exact same sentiments. The flexibility of having buses would eleviate almost any worry about the system crashing.I’ve posted this before….. but many times, in 2007 and 2008, before LRT was approved, former Regional Chair Andy Hayden warned us of going down the LRT path. He was in favour of a tunnel through the downtown core, but he said we should just expanded the fully functional Bus Rapid Transit system and run Busses through the tunnel…. And it would have cost 1/4 of what phase one was budgeted for.
![]()
Former regional chair slams Ottawa's new transit plan
The architect of Ottawa's Transitway system says the capital's new plan for transit is "pathetic" and a waste of taxpayer money.ottawa.ctvnews.ca
How many electric buses could they have bought for that same money & reduced the polution from diesel buses?I shared those exact same sentiments. The flexibility of having buses would eleviate almost any worry about the system crashing.
The type of LRT system we are building has the exact same problems in relation to weather as other cities who share the same climate. It's going to get worse.
Assuming a functional system (so not our situation) LRT typically wins out on cost over the long run. If all you care about is the upfront cost, tunnels for buses make sense. It's over 30 years where LRT is supposed to get the return on investment, again, key word here is supposed to...How many electric buses could they have bought for that same money & reduced the polution from diesel buses?
Assuming a functional system (so not our situation) LRT typically wins out on cost over the long run. If all you care about is the upfront cost, tunnels for buses make sense. It's over 30 years where LRT is supposed to get the return on investment, again, key word here is supposed to...
This is a bit of a different issue, no doubt that projects often go over budget, and can fail to live up to all the promises, but cost to operated an LRT is a known entity given the number of them around. Same with bus options. LRT once built (assuming you get a functional one...) should save money over the long run, even when accounting for cost overuns on the initial cost to build.
This is a bit of a different issue, no doubt that projects often go over budget, and can fail to live up to all the promises, but cost to operated an LRT is a known entity given the number of them around. Same with bus options. LRT once built (assuming you get a functional one...) should save money over the long run, even when accounting for cost overuns on the initial cost to build.
No denying the management of the LRT project was an abject failure, I'm not convinced had we gone with Tunnels for buses that we wouldn't have found a way to screw that up too though.