- Mar 20, 2025
- 152
- 166
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerThis is just a fun fact, there's no implied meaning lol. OP literally wrote "seemed interesting"The absolutely most worthless statistics imaginable. Near misses? They are not shots on goal.....they are equivalent to shooting it 30 feet wide.
oh, I know.....wasnt putting the OP down at all. But there will be people in here who will take this as some sort of meaningful statistic and run with it.This is just a fun fact, there's no implied meaning lol. OP literally wrote "seemed interesting"
Well it's a good thing you're preemptively scolding themoh, I know.....wasnt putting the OP down at all. But there will be people in here who will take this as some sort of meaningful statistic and run with it.
Curious...Thought it was interesting.
View attachment 1001311
Was waiting for it
@a mangy Meowth .....I rest my case, lol.Curious...
1. What was the source?
2. What if a player hit both?
3. Curious how many of these were on the same possession in off zone that fidnt produce a goal.
Thus is part of what I talked about elsewhere in the idea if small margins.
In that list 4 players are from buffalo.
Their total is 51. They have had about 75% of the games they lost in reg or in OT totaling 30 out of 41 IORzc. They score in 10 of these games where post becomes goal they turn some games into W in teg or tied forcing OT where its 50/50 on extra point likely adding 15 pts to buffalo record putting them in the WC race
Curious...
1. What was the source?
2. What if a player hit both?
3. Curious how many of these were on the same possession in off zone that fidnt produce a goal.
Thus is part of what I talked about elsewhere in the idea if small margins.
In that list 4 players are from buffalo.
Their total is 51. They have had about 75% of the games they lost in reg or in OT totaling 30 out of 41 IORzc. They score in 10 of these games where post becomes goal they turn some games into W in teg or tied forcing OT where its 50/50 on extra point likely adding 15 pts to buffalo record putting them in the WC race
Cool stat, where did you get that from ? I'm interested to see what Matthews near misses were last year, I think he had well over 20+ posts
I inderstand.....![]()
NHL Stats
The official source for NHL Stats including skaters, goalies, teams stats and more.www.nhl.com
I am assuming accuracy, but it does happen a few times per year where you hit both on one shot.
Smilar with the Avs. 3 of the top 7. Assuming even half of those go in, its likely a ton of wins added to their total.
Likely one dude whos job is to watch games and do all these random stats. Sees a shot, gives credit to x player, then checks a couple boxes on what type of shot it was.I inderstand.....
With buffalo they didnt have thr situation of puck hit post with close rebound and scrum occurs and goal is scored. It was more player shoots, Hits the post and goes out of play or hits boards and exits zone or D clears
Another thing--- unsure how much they researched it getting tipped or deflected by a teammate. If a goal was scored they would dig into tests for who to credit but not on shots that hit the post
These are more dangerous than the average shot on goal...this is a snipers statThe absolutely most worthless statistics imaginable. Near misses? They are not shots on goal.....they are equivalent to shooting it 30 feet wide.