Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 24,459
- 29,622
Gally pots his first as a Leaf tonight. Calling it.
Playing the team that didn't really give him a chance, and discarded him... He will be motivated for sure.
Gally pots his first as a Leaf tonight. Calling it.
FYP.
Actually it was usually a guaranteed loss.Timmy Peel could keep the Sens in the game long enough to catch some breaks and create that exciting finish. Love that fake parity!!!
Tempted to go see who's reffing. Tell me it's not that Skeletor joker?
After these two long breaks, I'm hoping that Matthews' wrist is good to go and he can get back into rhythm. He's dominated the Sens in his career, so I'm hoping he's chomping at the bit to get in there and hopefully can pot a couple of goals.
Need to crush this team, finally.
Yup, Matthews can't score without Marner apparently... perhaps someone should read this to Matty, to piss him off a little.
Didn't you post this same post previously? I have some sort of deja vu when reading this.Simmonds back and Campbell in net, team rested and Ottawa's 3rd game in 4 nights seems to point to a dominant Toronto win.
But sports history has shown us over and over that very little breaks the way we expect. Leafs trail early but comeback and take it 5-4 in OT. Matthews gets 3.
Thorny will get us to the promised land sire. He did that ONE time with the sesharks. They went to the finals and lost it to the penguinos. Now we have a chance with our current, more legendary and more talented team.LEADER. JT learn from this.... Teach and grow your team
Yup, Matthews can't score without Marner apparently... perhaps someone should read this to Matty, to piss him off a little.
Yup, Matthews can't score without Marner apparently... perhaps someone should read this to Matty, to piss him off a little.
Yup, Matthews can't score without Marner apparently... perhaps someone should read this to Matty, to piss him off a little.
Yup, Matthews can't score without Marner apparently... perhaps someone should read this to Matty, to piss him off a little.
We're not. It's flipped on the graphic for some reason. We're 30.6 for, 28.4 against.DAMN I didn't think our shot differential was in the negative i.e. giving up more shots on goal versus putting shots on goal.
The idea that Matthews needs Marner to score is asinine. Like don’t get me wrong they make a good duo but if Keefe ever decided to separate them I would expect that neither of them would miss a beat.
IMO it seems more that the Leafs play down to the level of their opponent.If we lose this one we need to hire some sports psychologists stat. I realize they have these already in house or on retainer but you would have to clean house in that area.
I just don't understand how a basement team can be motivated to beat a far superior team as often as Ottawa beats us. Sure you can say "it's their Stanley Cup" or the usual fan effort to explain it away. But at some point if you can't get up and convincingly beat a bottom dweller who you KNOW is going to bring their absolute best against you as their top rival - then you essentially have a team that can't possibly be expected to match playoff intensity in a playoff series.
So sick of seeing the Sens game plan against us work perfectly. I live here in Ottawa and it SUCKS! Figure it out and beat these guys FFS!