keonsbitterness
Registered User
.....says the Sabres fan.Islanders lead nhl in hits and we dress Anderson?? Not Clifford or Ritchie.
.....says the Sabres fan.Islanders lead nhl in hits and we dress Anderson?? Not Clifford or Ritchie.
What if when we don't have the puck, like the other 42% of the game (or so), we hit the opposition?
Wouldn't that be something.
Can a team hit and win? Or is it just one or the other?
Thanks for taking the time to explain, but I'm just wondering.
Clifford never has the puck...and also doesn't hit because he is to far behind the play.Easy to hit a lot when you never have the puck.
And Joey is gritty AF anyways, and clearly better than Ritchie and Clifford.
mrazek seems a lot calmer today
You say the play was not soft but then say he needs to close the gap. Which is it?
And where was Sandin, again?
I bet everyone knows that. I think fans who would like to see their team hit and WIN, should be allowed to have that opinion. Imo.You can hit and win. You don't have to hit to win.
Yes, it's refreshing to see good decisions being madeIslanders lead nhl in hits and we dress Anderson?? Not Clifford or Ritchie.
Chara has gotten away with like 5 penalties tonight. He is literally only getting by in this league because the refs let him.
Hit from behind Chara on Kerfoot, what a bunch of a bs
Chara gets away with f***ing everything
He's been a dirtbag player most of his career and gets way too much love for his "defense". He's a perfect Bruin.Chara has gotten away with like 5 penalties tonight. He is literally only getting by in this league because the refs let him.