Obo
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2019
- 611
- 621
Offside shouldn't be reviewable. I spent the moments leading up to that goal wondering if there was any point in attacking.
they didnt challenge it.No penalty for the failed challenge? Is it only for goalie interference?
They called a timeout but did not challenge.No penalty for the failed challenge? Is it only for goalie interference?
oh....so they just burned a timeout to NOT challenge it? ok thenthey didnt challenge it.
It honestly takes a lot of fun out of it. The whole time they kept it in the zone I thought it wasn't going to matter because I thought a challenge was going to happen even if they did score.Offside shouldn't be reviewable. I spent the moments leading up to that goal wondering if there was any point in attacking.
Love Matthews playing more physical the last year or so. But I'm not sure its a good thing when your 60 goal scorer leads the team in hits lol
Probably only a turnover because there's 6 guys on the ice lol.thank god vegas screwed that up because that was one bad turnover
yeap...they burned it and decided not to challenge it. used to make sure if they should or not apparently.oh....so they just burned a timeout to NOT challenge it? ok then