jamo27
Registered User
- Mar 24, 2007
- 514
- 779
rielly shouldnt be on pp1 though we move him to pp2 for klingberg but not for lily?I dunno, what better time to get your number 1 PP back on the PP than in a 4-1 game.
I think it’s been adjusted to 23 shots for, which is pretty crazy. Giving up 14 shots sucks, but thankfully we have elite goaltending.
48 game win streak, dont @ meWe're closing the year 27-0, don't @ me
It's been longer than 5. It's been most of 2024, with a few blips. We have all the skill in the world with the big 4, Rielly, Robertson etc. But it looks like Brad understands what it needs to be surrounded by. The exact pieces aren't there yet, but the type of player has been brought in, in spades.
Kerfoot, Holl, Lafferty, Malgin, Petan offered nothing we needed. These new guys seem to though.
We're closing the year 27-0, don't @ me
#ridlygreigmvp
Because Liljegren isn’t as good as Rielly on the pprielly shouldnt be on pp1 though we move him to pp2 for klingberg but not for lily?
Pleased to see that Liljegren is leading the team in TOI, 14:35. Keefe finding out what he has with the young fella, even with Rielly back in the lineup.
Pretty clear what we need Tre. Make er happen.
Exactly.IT's Bobby McMann clones, right?
Preferably one that can play RD?
Yea Sabres will lose 30 games in a row but as soon as they play LeafsSo you're predicting two wins against Buffalo!?!
Damn, that's very bold!
Galvanize: word of the month.
I've used it a few times.
id argue less is more rielly is all over the place doesnt have a big shot why fix something that isnt broken keefes done that everywhere else in the lineup why tinker with that part theres a reason why he always moves rielly off for a right shot cause a right shot is ideal for this power play since it runs through matthews it sets up 3 onetimer optionsBecause Liljegren isn’t as good as Rielly on the pp
We did this with Sandin and saw first hand short term pp success doesn’t translate and can actively cause goals against