Confirmed with Link: Leafs Trade: Liljegren to San Jose for Matt Benning, 3rd and 6th

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.

LeafEgo

Registered User
Oct 8, 2021
1,011
877
I think awarding a contract to a guy who you know isn't worth it AND giving him term carries a considerable amount of unnecessary risk. Especially when you knew there was a reasonable chance the new coach wouldn't have much interest in showcasing him.

Tre put himself in a hole, and had to quickly dig himself out. It's worked out, in the end, so water under the bridge for the most part. But I don't think anyone can say this was an ideal situation (with a straight face, at least)

I actually liked Tres free agency this year,l. Having 3 more mil to play around with could have given the third line an extra impact player, or maybe being able to add a 6 mil D man if need be. It's not unreasonable to think that 3 mil in free agency could be more impactful than whatever Tre trades that 3rd rounder for at the tdl next year.
Personally never saw any risk when he was signed or since then, and thought the price and term was to mitigate risk, as he would have been paid the same or more in FA by potential suitors. As it turns out it only took a couple weeks to move him for an expected return.

I don't think Tre predicted Berube to hate him as much as he did. That's a bit of a black eye, but it didn't affect his value much, if at all.

As you said, the other option was walking him and using the money in FA, but FA was a success and we wouldn't have a 3rd and a 6th today.

There was a lot of hub bub on the boards but I'm not sure this was ever actually a problem.
 

Ianturnedbull

Registered User
Jun 11, 2022
6,006
5,413
A fair question to say the least.

One would assume Tre figured he'd be able to get something for him on the market. But it's a puzzling deal to give to a guy with clearly little value around the league
Maybe it was due to the fact that OEL, Tanev, and Hakanpaa were not signed yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menzinger

hockeywiz542

Registered User
May 26, 2008
16,177
5,247

Acquired as part of the Liljegren deal last Wednesday, Matt Benning has another season left on his deal after this one that carries a $1.25M cap hit. The 30-year-old is certainly a servicable NHL defenseman, but he is in the same situation that Liljegren was in - at the bottom of the depth chart for the Leafs.

The Leafs still have some time, but will need to decide the right course of action for their roster once the conditioning stints for the injured Jani Hakanpaa and Connor Dewar end.


Sitting with 23 players on their roster currently, the Leafs need to move two players, whether that be through waivers or via trade in order to activate Hakanpaa and Dewar. Given his place on the depth chart of the Leafs, Benning is the most likely defensive candidate to be placed on waivers or be traded.

While he hasn't gotten to play since joining the Leafs, Sportsnet's Elliotte Friedman revealed during 'Saturday Headlines' that the Leafs are trying to do right by Benning and get him somewhere that will allow him to play.

"They have roster crunches they are going to have to deal with when everyone gets healthy. They have let it be known that they want to do right by Benning. He's a guy who is an NHL player. He's more than capable of playing on a roster. They are trying to do what's best for him. Teams know he's available."

Friedman doubled-down on his comments on his '32 Thoughts' podcast Monday, but noted that when he was added to the Liljegren trade, the Leafs asked the Sharks which teams had shown interest in the former sixth-round pick, demonstrating they intended to help Benning find a spot to play the entire time. As time ticks down on the Leafs' roster decisions, if Benning finds himself getting into a game or two, it may change his position on the depth chart, but as of now, he appears to be the odd man out on the blueline.
 

IronHookem

Registered User
Nov 8, 2023
212
220
Good riddance.

We win that Bruins series last season if we didn't start this guy
Of course, it had nothing to do with the fact that our core underperformed yet again, not to mention Samsonovs performance in those first couple of games.

Now that we removed the only thing that held us back last year, the cup will finally be ours! :sarcasm:
 

Namikaze Minato

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
5,167
6,878
Beautiful B.C.
Of course, it had nothing to do with the fact that our core underperformed yet again, not to mention Samsonovs performance in those first couple of games.

Now that we removed the only thing that held us back last year, the cup will finally be ours! :sarcasm:
It's so upsetting knowing that all we had to do was remove Holl and we would win a cup but somehow they didn't factor this in?!
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad