Post-Game Talk: Leafs snatch victory from the jaws of defeat, 2-1 OT win

[Hellcat]

Me? I responded to a poster who said the depth guys aren't producing.That isnt a negative light? Of course the depth guys aren't!... They get paid table scraps and don't play PP. The core guys can hardly produce 5v5.

AND...apparently we have to play Reaves because the core guys taking up the entire cap have no leadership abilities, are easily pushed around and easily intimidated.

Stop at the first paragraph, the second paragraph makes you look like a guy who always looks for the negative.

 

[darrylsittler27]

Belfour:
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]2002-03[/TD]
[TD]Toronto Maple Leafs[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]62[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]3738[/TD]
[TD]141[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]2.26[/TD]
[TD]37[/TD]
[TD]20[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]1675[/TD]
[TD]0.922[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2003-04[/TD]
[TD]Toronto Maple Leafs[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]59[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]3444[/TD]
[TD]122[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]2.13[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]1361[/TD]
[TD]0.918[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2005-06[/TD]
[TD]Toronto Maple Leafs[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]49[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]12[/TD]
[TD]2897[/TD]
[TD]159[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]3.29[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]1317[/TD]
[TD]0.892[/TD]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Cujo:
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]1998-99[/TD]
[TD]Toronto Maple Leafs[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]67[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]4001[/TD]
[TD]171[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]2.56[/TD]
[TD]35[/TD]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]1732[/TD]
[TD]0.910[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]1999-00[/TD]
[TD]Toronto Maple Leafs[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]63[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]14[/TD]
[TD]3801[/TD]
[TD]158[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]2.49[/TD]
[TD]36[/TD]
[TD]20[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]1696[/TD]
[TD]0.915[/TD]
[TD]12[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2000-01[/TD]
[TD]Toronto Maple Leafs[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]68[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]4100[/TD]
[TD]163[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]2.39[/TD]
[TD]33[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]1744[/TD]
[TD]0.915[/TD]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2001-02[/TD]
[TD]Toronto Maple Leafs[/TD]
[TD]NHL[/TD]
[TD]51[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]3065[/TD]
[TD]114[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]2.23[/TD]
[TD]29[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]1096[/TD]
[TD]0.906[/TD]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Both great goalies, but Cujo had the ability to steal games. "Better" by which metric?

Belfour's average GA was 2.56, SV% .911 over 3 years
Cujo's average GA was 2.42, SV% .912 over 4 years

Cujo was the "better" goalie stats-wise and with the ability to steal a game.

Who has a ring? And what were their ages in this time period.

 

[CabanaBoy5]

Who has a ring? And what were their ages in this time period.

Who cares who has a ring and what their ages were. We were discussing their tenure with the Leafs and which had stolen a game they didn't deserve to win. Some say Cujo was better over the 4 years, some say Belfour over the 3 years, and that's ok. Their ages and past accomplishments don't enter into the equation. I remember Cujo spectacularly stealing games and Stolarz reminded me of the last time I'd seen something like that. They both were great goalies for us, regardless of age and rings.

 

[darrylsittler27]

Who cares who has a ring and what their ages were. We were discussing their tenure with the Leafs and which had stolen a game they didn't deserve to win. Some say Cujo was better over the 4 years, some say Belfour over the 3 years, and that's ok. Their ages and past accomplishments don't enter into the equation. I remember Cujo spectacularly stealing games and Stolarz reminded me of the last time I'd seen something like that. They both were great goalies for us, regardless of age and rings.

I think Stolarz will be the guy come playoffs.