Confirmed with Link: Leafs re-sign G Matt Murray (1 year, $875k)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Look for BT to take advantage of the CBA loophole for injured players that spent the season on LTIR.

Don't be surprised if they also re-sign John Klingberg ..

Both players can re-sign for $875k base + bonuses type contracts where the base is the only part that counts against the cap, the rest into a slush fund

Murray would come in at the same rate as Martin Jones last year as #3 depth.
 
Last edited:
All kidding aside. This is a good move
 

Attachments

  • Moe_Tossing_Barney_From_Moe's.jpg
    Moe_Tossing_Barney_From_Moe's.jpg
    91.4 KB · Views: 4
  • Like
Reactions: leafs in five
Look for BT to take advantage of the CBA loophole for injured players that spent the season on LTIR.

Don't be surprised if they also re-sign John Klingberg ..

Both players can re-sign for $800 base + bonuses type contracts where the base is the only part that counts against the cap, the rest into a slush fund

Murray would come in at the same rate as Martin Jones last year as #3 depth.
If it's that type of deal then it's good
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forgotusername
Look for BT to take advantage of the CBA loophole for injured players that spent the season on LTIR.

Don't be surprised if they also re-sign John Klingberg ..

Both players can re-sign for $800 base + bonuses type contracts where the base is the only part that counts against the cap, the rest into a slush fund

Murray would come in at the same rate as Martin Jones last year as #3 depth.
Mess spin score: 9.9/10
 
Look for BT to take advantage of the CBA loophole for injured players that spent the season on LTIR.

Don't be surprised if they also re-sign John Klingberg ..

Both players can re-sign for $800 base + bonuses type contracts where the base is the only part that counts against the cap, the rest into a slush fund

Murray would come in at the same rate as Martin Jones last year as #3 depth.
I can't imagine there's the interest to justify a bonus focused contract v. League minimum. Kling is similar
 
He’s a decent number 3 option who might be able to surprise and give some number one play for a stretch here and there. Basically be Martin Jones.
 
Look for BT to take advantage of the CBA loophole for injured players that spent the season on LTIR.

Don't be surprised if they also re-sign John Klingberg ..

Both players can re-sign for $800 base + bonuses type contracts where the base is the only part that counts against the cap, the rest into a slush fund

Murray would come in at the same rate as Martin Jones last year as #3 depth.

Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised to see a Klingberg reclamation again, maybe team up with OEL for a 2010s Swedish retro.
 
Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised to see a Klingberg reclamation again, maybe team up with OEL for a 2010s Swedish retro.

1719851893033.png


Base minimum salary as expected to play #3 and despite made of glass himself also might be available to play if Woll injury history concern persists.

Leafs brought in Murray with $15 mil remaining on his salary at a ridiculous Cap hit and now the Leafs will get value at $875k as depth relief.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Its not your fault
A contender for surprise signing/re-signing of the day? Here's to hoping that he can work his way back to being able to provide any depth which may be necessary.
 
Look for BT to take advantage of the CBA loophole for injured players that spent the season on LTIR.

Don't be surprised if they also re-sign John Klingberg ..

Both players can re-sign for $875k base + bonuses type contracts where the base is the only part that counts against the cap, the rest into a slush fund

Murray would come in at the same rate as Martin Jones last year as #3 depth.
Interesting. I'm a numbers guy so I wish I cared enough to understand the CBA better. Regardless, there is no question Leafs have the resources to figure this out on a case by case basis. There are other examples of other teams who engage in cap acrobatics which they can draw from as well I'm sure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This one actually makes sense for the team and player. Very good chance he won't be on the roster to start the season though since I'd imagine he will be waived after camp for cap purposes
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad