9Iron Registered User Nov 25, 2009 1,864 1,631 May 12, 2023 #1,576 Pretty sure it's in but not conclusive.
Nineteen67 HFBoards Sponsor Sponsor Dec 12, 2017 24,506 11,264 May 12, 2023 #1,578 Tbs has a great view and it’s in Reactions: Seath The Scaleless
Jozay Registered User Jul 9, 2012 14,788 10,778 Toronto May 12, 2023 #1,579 Call on the ice stands imo
Seath The Scaleless Paledrake Oct 15, 2014 12,433 11,835 The Duke's Archives May 12, 2023 #1,580 Goal or no goal, Rielly again doing something out there Absolute stud in the playoffs. Reactions: Ginger Papa
Mr_Fun Find me sombaty to love. Oct 7, 2006 4,202 3,876 BC May 12, 2023 #1,581 It's in but I dont see it in. Reactions: PhiladelphiaKessel
GoonieFace Registered User Jun 24, 2013 7,606 7,703 The Matrix May 12, 2023 #1,582 No way they count that
Mopar Registered User May 3, 2021 345 715 May 12, 2023 #1,584 DarkKnight said: The pad is in, it’s under his pad!!! Click to expand... This. Can't see it in, but its definitely not OUT. Goal. Reactions: DarkKnight
DarkKnight said: The pad is in, it’s under his pad!!! Click to expand... This. Can't see it in, but its definitely not OUT. Goal.
All Mod Cons Registered User Sep 7, 2018 10,652 11,290 May 12, 2023 #1,585 What was the one against Tampa that was called good?
Leafs1991 Registered User Nov 17, 2015 1,599 1,006 May 12, 2023 #1,586 So yes, it's hard to tell but that pad goes far enough back with the puck underneath it. That has to be in...
So yes, it's hard to tell but that pad goes far enough back with the puck underneath it. That has to be in...
keonsbitterness Registered User Sep 14, 2010 35,990 19,485 south of Steeles May 12, 2023 #1,587 I think it's in, but is there evidence. Reactions: PhiladelphiaKessel, Ginger Papa and New User Name
A1LeafNation Good, is simply not good enough! Oct 17, 2010 27,681 17,755 May 12, 2023 #1,588 We all know it's in. But no camera angle so no goal.
New User Name Registered User Jan 2, 2008 13,095 2,084 May 12, 2023 #1,589 Ya, call on the ice was no goal. It's not conclusive that it was in damn
HEAVY DUTY Thanks to denial, I’m immortal. Jul 10, 2010 7,003 1,938 Toronto, ON May 12, 2023 #1,591 hard to tell. its gonna be no goal.
hamzarocks Registered User Jul 22, 2012 21,248 14,661 Pickering, Ontario May 12, 2023 #1,592 Think it should count The tampa goal was 50/50 and it counted Give us that edge to NHL
Carltons Cup Let's Do This.. Feb 22, 2018 2,902 4,696 May 12, 2023 #1,593 Wtf is taking so long??????
Wendelstache Registered User May 5, 2010 9,888 3,813 May 12, 2023 #1,594 really need cyclops in the nhl Reactions: Ginger Papa
Guided by Veseys Registered User Nov 14, 2011 3,728 3,028 May 12, 2023 #1,595 That’s pretty wild. It must have gone in but the angles are just so inconclusive
Menzinger Kessel4LadyByng Apr 24, 2014 41,889 34,179 St. Paul, MN May 12, 2023 #1,596 It's not even implied that it's in. You can see part of the puck across the line
thewave Registered User Jun 17, 2011 41,315 11,578 May 12, 2023 #1,597 Zero1 said: THAT’S INNNNNN Click to expand... It is in Reactions: Zero1
Apotheosis Registered User Mar 27, 2014 11,618 5,178 Toronto, Ontario May 12, 2023 #1,598 It's definitely in based on the position of his pads but you can't see the puck
HockeyMad68 Registered User Oct 14, 2017 1,397 722 May 12, 2023 #1,599 The back skate crossed the line but I could not see puck
PromisedLand I need more FOOD Dec 3, 2016 44,504 59,004 Hogwarts May 12, 2023 #1,600 puck is underneath his pad and his pad is over the line is there a camera angle that can show that puck somewhere
puck is underneath his pad and his pad is over the line is there a camera angle that can show that puck somewhere