My problem with reviews is the inconsistency. That kicking goal is sometimes called good, sometimes called no goal. We've seen worse leg movements to redirect the puck that has been allowed after video review.
The high stick one was worse. How does a pro league in this day and age not have a camera set up at perfect crossbar height? The technology exists to get it right. Frikken spend the money and use it ffs.
How does a skewed camera angle supposed to help anyone get the call right? Imagine game 7 of a playoff round and the highstick is a hair over or under the crossbar. No ref will ever be able to know for sure.
Put another camera or two IN the net just under the crossbar at the back, use AI to determine, it should be able to triangulate using them and the existing cameras.
Not sure that record is indicative of anything but good fortune, who is going to have a +50% PP over 3 or 4 games, I think they scored something like 1, 5 on 5 goal over that hot stretch but something like 7 or 8 PP goals. Without that red hot PP our recored would be sub .500.
I think they said we have 19 back to backs this year? Just shy of 50% of our games are B2B
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.