Stolarz looked human, first line shadowed by the selke winner all night and Robertson doesn't pass to our leading scorer on a 2 on 1 where Willy had a completely open net for a tap in.
Leafs also had a softer forward lineup than is optimal in this type of game. No Knies and McMann going down midway left us without our two powerforwards. Matthews isn’t Lindros or Ovechkin but he does now use his size to win physical battles. Reaves, Domi, and Pacioretty all bring their own brand of physicality and grit and were missing. Grebenkin will be a force but he's not acclimated enough to assert himself. Holmberg and Robertson are soft AF and both were in the top six. Alex Nylander is also soft and Minten is too young to be expected to do much.
What? The pass was really well covered on that play
Just curious as to what the lesson might be?
This one was over after the 1st, sadly. Good stretch lately but bound to be some bumps, on to Tampa.
Yeah it was covered well because Robertson has no separation speed and was hell bent on carrying it, while telegraphing shot the whole time. And shot he did.
Saying that the Leafs always get their shit pushed in in big games isn't "A hot take".Predictable chedule loss. Panthers on a 4 game losing streak, giving up 4+ goals in three of those games. Leafs were on a good stretch. Incoming hot takes.
They needed the opening PP goal too. But so much needed to go right to win 2-1 or 3-2. Need 34 back with the multi goals every few games.That game could have ended very different had they not given up the shorthanded goal.
We lost 5-1What conclusions can we draw from this?
Punta or San Domingo?Didn't watch the game. I left for the Dominican for a week. But it sounds like a typical Leafs performance in a big game. They not only lost. But, got their shit pushed in
What conclusions can we draw from this?
One game samples don't mean much really.What conclusions can we draw from this?