Nicely stated. Nobody knows if you can win with 1/2 your cap going to 4 forwards but I am coming to the conclusion this one cannot unless it is surrounded by a better supporting. Hence the short term dilema. If the answer is Dubas' great drafting, we are a minimum of a couple of years away. Sadly the answer might be that one of our 3 $11M players needs to go.
Thanks Tone, problem is it seems AM shows up game in and out most nights and carries play and is noticeable, if Marner and Nylander could play like their 1st couple seasons most games mabe we wouldn't be having this discussion, even JT was real good like his 1st season with us.
Now out of the 3 they never fire on all cylinders at the same time, too many nights one shows up to play while the others are invisible it seems and then the rest of the team is quite a few tiers down in quality due to cap. Reilly was good with Hainsey go figure and now struggles in games and possesses no big threat(big shot) from the point ala guys like Weber, former McCabe, etc and a few others which makes a power play lethal in balance with some of our skilled forwards. He is a great skater and carries the puck well up ice but defense has not been strong for him since Hainsey left.
I find Nylander still floats too much and Marner just seems to botch things up forcing passes and plays that just are not there creating turn overs and hasn't been his Magical sharp self since the big raise. Also being smallish he possesses no forecheck with feeble tenacity in puck battles and cannot help the team when his prime skills are in struggle. We have too many that just refuse to bang and crash like other teams which force turn overs and make them hard to play against. Going out getting a few older players to do that just does not cut an identity, however I am ok with the way they have contributed for the small contracts they accepted.
To beat Toronto and most teams in the league know is to clog up the middle of the ice with a hard fore check on the puck carrier to neutralize their skill