crazychimp
Registered User
Loved Petey’s defensive play tonight, Miller on the other hand looked lazy and slow not sure what his deal is but one of the forwards needs to cover for him because he was out of position too many times.
Sounds like 99.99% of my posts.i have no idea what we’re talking about here
God damn Myers is good, no need to trade for a D just feed him more minutes
Not that I'm complaining about the win, but I'm still wondering what kind of dirt Juulsen has on the coaching staff.
Just as planned.That shot by Myers, that deflected off BB, was legit going 15' wide.
I don't know about ass but it wouldn't surprise me if they play in Winnipeg similar to how they played in Carolina where they keep up with a good team and don't allow much but also don't create enough to win.Bona fide*, for one and all.
Nice to beat TO. Now back to ass for another 5 games?
miller was ass tonight. petey was a beast. qh being dominate again. the later D held their fort against the leafs. they didnt create much offense. shutdown their powerplay too. when will branstrom get in again? soucy should be the next one out. heinen hasnt scored in forever it seems.
It's not close when you consider the difference in offensive support.Quinn Hughes has 2 fewer points (1.24 PPG) than Makar (1.11 PPG) in 6 fewer games played.
Honestly Hughes is the best player in the world right now. Ya I said it. No one is controlling the game every time he steps on the ice like he does. I wish the surrounding pieces were going better because it would be a shame to waste this!It's not close when you consider the difference in offensive support.
How many phantom 2nd assists is Hughes getting? Typically he's the one making the play on any goals he's getting points on.
Hughes doesn't have a player on his team that he can defer to and say "ok you go do something" like Makar has with MacKinnon.
You can't be dominate. You dominate.
Hughes was dominant.
Thank you. Considering we all spend time on a forum where language is literally the foundation of it, the amount of basic mistakes is quite surprising.
My mum is a schoolteacher, you may find this video interesting.
More or less we basically taught boys in a way that made them dyslexic. And when the kids had trouble, they got told *they* were wrong. I think this way of learning also leads to problems with more advanced arithmetic down the road. I always killed Mad Minute in 20 seconds, but long form was a f***ing grind. The only reason I had any further success in math was because she stuck me in summer school against my wishes (after passing Math 10) and sitting doing every f***ing problem I had with the homework.
There's almost certainly some chicken and egg going on here, as well. There are likely folks that have the wrong word in there because the autocorrect did it and they didn't notice, and, given that the common ones are basically all words that sound the same, there are likely folks who have never known that "gaff" isn't "gaffe," or who have seen "dominant" left as "dominate" enough times that they just think that it's correct.I do wonder how much predictive text has played into things though, where someone knows the word they mean but lazily type it and then fix it with predictive text/spell check and don’t notice it’s not the right word. The same way we can read scrambled words as long as the first and last letters are the same, it’s easy to gloss over mistakes of using similar words if we’re not proofreading carefully