Dreakmur
Registered User
Because surface level wins and losses in a tiny sample with no context was your entire reasoning for claiming that Keefe wasn't NHL caliber.
Surface level wins are certainly a big part of it.
What context did you want? The team should have won despite the context.
Lots of options outside of that.
As I said, your bad luck excuses might have merit against contending teams, but we lost to borderline playoff teams. Context shouldn’t even matter - we should demolish both those teams.
Your assumption regarding this deflection of yours would be incorrect.
So then what strategies does Keefe implement that you like?