Pre-Game Talk: Leafs at Ducks Nov. 28th 8pm

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ducks have been sneaky good this year and Gibson is Vezina caliber. Interested to see Zegras and Drysdale up close but obviously would also prefer the Leafs just shut them down and roll into the the "big" Colorado game on a high.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocker13
I'd still rather have Semyonov in there over Clifford. Other than subbing in for an injured Simmons, he really shouldn't see the lineup.
 
Dude is Holl-ful. Was not tested last game, but still managed to look shaky as hell. Imo, not an NHL defenceman even as a 6-7.
Judging on how a D looks is not how they are graded.

Since Holl was re-inserted in the lineup, the Leafs are 8-1 with 28 GF and 11 GA - in 9 games. When Holl was sitting, the Leafs went 4-1 with 17GF and 12GA.

The reality is, the Leafs are a better team with Holl in the lineup than someone else in his place.
 
Judging on how a D looks is not how they are graded.

Since Holl was re-inserted in the lineup, the Leafs are 8-1 with 28 GF and 11 GA - in 9 games. When Holl was sitting, the Leafs went 4-1 with 17GF and 12GA.

The reality is, the Leafs are a better team with Holl in the lineup than someone else in his place.

Holl has been solid, but I think we would be fine just using Dermott and Liljegren full time.

If we could add a good #7 and get a proper return for Holl, we can probably afford to move him at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wingman75
Bunting-Matthews-Marner line that has the potential to be one of the greatest lines in Maple Leafs history.

Serious here, not joking around. That's Tiger-Sittler-Macdonald good or better.

Bunting seems to have good hands, he can pass the puck. He's a grinder type of player, like a smaller version of Simmons in his prime.

The only guess I can think of Matthews and Marner, now they seem they are playing not to score, instead of always trying to score. They just play.

After being reunited Matthews and Marner this season, after three games back together, 5 on 5 it was unremarkable.

Maybe they changed after that 2-1 game, forget who they played, but it was 2-0 and Matthews and Marner get scored on, by the other team's 4th line. That was kind of funny, but the Leafs still win.

Matthews and Marner do not have to score 5 on 5, and this team will still win. The pressure is totally off.

Maybe they realize the pressure to score every shift is off, and now they just play? Last few games of Matthews and Marner best I have ever seen.

:nopity:
 
I'd still rather have Semyonov in there over Clifford. Other than subbing in for an injured Simmons, he really shouldn't see the lineup.

We haven't even seen Clifford play this year and we're already going with takes like this?
 
Holl has been solid, but I think we would be fine just using Dermott and Liljegren full time.

If we could add a good #7 and get a proper return for Holl, we can probably afford to move him at this point.
With Covid outbreaks possible at any time (and lack of significant D injuries to date), it is far too premature to look at moving anyone. One thing stats cannot do at all is predict chemistry.....
 
Matthews with Marner, what I believe that in the past, 5 on 5, the puck stops moving in the offensive. Not sure why that was the case, but that was what I remember seeing.

In the offensive zone, the puck would wind up on Marner's stick, and it stops moving.

Now it is not like that, the puck is always moving, and that is creating havoc.

:hyper:
 
With Covid outbreaks possible at any time (and lack of significant D injuries to date), it is far too premature to look at moving anyone. One thing stats cannot do at all is predict chemistry.....

We are going to need to move someone in about 2 weeks anyways.

Engvall would be my first choice, because he is the easiest to replace with what we currently have.

However, Holl is easily my second choice.
 
Holl has been solid, but I think we would be fine just using Dermott and Liljegren full time.

If we could add a good #7 and get a proper return for Holl, we can probably afford to move him at this point.

I do hope and expect Liljegren and Dermott to be upgrades over Holl in due time. However, I'd still be hesitant to deem the Leafs a better team if plugging either into his role at the moment.
 
The fact that during the practice questions Keefe very quickly want d to move on from the Kase questions worried me a bit, hopefully not much to it
 
Judging on how a D looks is not how they are graded.

Since Holl was re-inserted in the lineup, the Leafs are 8-1 with 28 GF and 11 GA - in 9 games. When Holl was sitting, the Leafs went 4-1 with 17GF and 12GA.

The reality is, the Leafs are a better team with Holl in the lineup than someone else in his place.
Genuinely curious if you think Leafs wouldn't have those numbers if Holl was scratched.
 
Judging on how a D looks is not how they are graded.

Since Holl was re-inserted in the lineup, the Leafs are 8-1 with 28 GF and 11 GA - in 9 games. When Holl was sitting, the Leafs went 4-1 with 17GF and 12GA.

The reality is, the Leafs are a better team with Holl in the lineup than someone else in his place.

I refuse to believe Justin Holl is responsible for an 11 goal increase in offensive production
 
I refuse to believe Justin Holl is responsible for an 11 goal increase in offensive production
He's not. The results the Leafs are putting up since he came in seem to me to have way more to do with goaltending and the top six waking up a little bit. He's been better but still clearly a contender for the weak link back there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad