paulmm3
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2014
- 1,131
- 884
So he’s wrong about one thing and that makes him wrong about everything? There’s not one person on this earth that hasn’t been wrong once.
i've long liked spence and danault as blue jackets targets, but if mikey anderson is available he'd be by far my top target. i assume we'd have to throw in some picks, but we have surplus capital there.What's the price on Sillinger to LA?
Anderson from the Habs?i've long liked spence and danault as blue jackets targets, but if anderson is available he'd be by far my top target. i assume we'd have to throw in some picks, but we have surplus capital there.
So he’s wrong about one thing and that makes him wrong about everything? There’s not one person on this earth that hasn’t been wrong once.
i'd take josh anderson back here, just not for cole sillinger lolAnderson from the Habs?
Should Dubas add Crosby at 50% retained as well?I'd take rakell with 26 1st unprotected back from Pittsburgh along with a prospect
Only on the canadian side
...
Josh Anderson from the Habs? Is that you would go that or you would like the Sabres to do that or you think the Sabres would do that?i'd take josh anderson back here, just not for cole sillinger lol
I'd take rakell with 26 1st unprotected back from Pittsburgh along with a prospect
It's called a CURSEWhy does Buffalo always seem to have issues with so many players etc. Seems there is always drama. It is no wonder they never make the playoffs. So unstable for one reason or another.
talking from the columbus perspective, but god forbid a hfboards thread go off-topic i guessJosh Anderson from the Habs? Is that you would go that or you would like the Sabres to do that or you think the Sabres would do that?
I highly doubt Anderson is available. Only reason I brought him up is if Buffalo wanted him in a deal for Byram and Peterka together as they asked for a partner for Dahlin. I think Spence for Sillinger would work well. I don't think Danault would waive his modified NMC for Columbus. If he was willing what would the package be if it was Spence and Danault for Sillinger + ?i've long liked spence and danault as blue jackets targets, but if mikey anderson is available he'd be by far my top target. i assume we'd have to throw in some picks, but we have surplus capital there.
No. Mikey Anderson from LA.Anderson from the Habs?
Generally speaking, "I would" translates loosely into "I would be OK/happy if my team made this deal". Some pretty literally mean it as "If I were GM, I would do this deal".As an old timer who doesn’t get these trade threads could I get clarification? When a poster responds with “I would” do they mean anything more than simply what they, as a fan, would do? Or is there some added meaning, like I hope my club would do this? Or, I think my club would do this?
I don't think the Sabres would do draft picks but outside of Sid, I don't know if there's an off-limits roster player.
Like a package around Rakell would be solid for Buffalo given that Rakell will provide similar offensive output likely at a lower cost allowing them to bolster other depth positions.
Clarifier: I said PACKAGE around Rakell. NOT Rakell 1:1. I feel on the main boards it's uber important to reinforce that for weak readers.
yeah obviously this would be a very different deal but mikey anderson is the type of player i'd give up voronkov+ to get. he fits our needs extremely well.I highly doubt Anderson is available. Only reason I brought him up is if Buffalo wanted him in a deal for Byram and Peterka together as they asked for a partner for Dahlin.
not exactly sure what the plus would be there but i assume it'd be workable for columbus. not sure if LAK wants picks (or what the cost would be there) or would prefer the extra part of that to be a roster player (chinakhov) or prospect (svozil?). but the basic framework is doable.I don't think Danault would waive his modified NMC for Columbus. If he was willing what would the package be if it was Spence and Danault for Sillinger + ?
A Canes/Sabres swap makes sense for Peterka. The Canes have a bunch of young talent on ELCs but have a bit of a surplus at right wing and a shortness at left wing. The Sabres seem to have a king's ransom of left-shot wingers but aren't as deep on the right, so Blake for Peterka, as a base package, would be an interesting idea for both teams.
considering the rangers/sabres were close enough to a peterka deal that renaud lavoie was reporting on it i’d bet a lot of money that he ends up a ranger
Have to be Seider ++. Doubt the Sabres want another left shot D with Power and Dahlin holding down the top two spots.If "interesting" has no connection or resemblance to "interested in making", or 'both teams" means "the Canes", yeah, for sure.
I would suspect that if talks were close then almost certainly Schneider or Miller were going the other way.
Rangers fans are adamant Drury will not move Cuylle, which be the other piece that fits as a Sabres target.
I don't hate something around Zub for Peterka.
Ottawa had their chance in JJP's draft year and decided to take Emil Jarviente. Terrible decision and plenty of Senators fans were not happyHe’d be a sick fit in Ottawa. Tkatchuk-Stutzle-Peterka would be one of the best lines in the league.
I'd take rakell with 26 1st unprotected back from Pittsburgh along with a prospect