Value of: LD Ryan Lindgren
- Thread starter LiveLongandProspal
- Start date
leeroggy
Registered User
- Jan 3, 2010
- 9,910
- 6,200
There’s a big difference between playing on the top line and BEING a atop line player
He’s not a #1
LiveLongandProspal
NY Rangers = America's Team
I'd say on most good teams he's a second-pair guy in the mold of Hjalmarsson
Without him Rangers defense is not as good. As a Rangers fan it starts with 1st round pick, top 6 forward and top C prospect to start talks. would need overpayment. he is too important to the Rangers. Fox is better with Lindgren than without. Lindgren is a warrior.
LiveLongandProspal
NY Rangers = America's Team
Gotta think of selling, dude. This season is swirling around the porcelain throne. Lindgren is one of our easier to trade assets since his contract is reasonable and he doesn’t have a NMC (I don’t think).
But knowing Drury, he’ll probably just accept a fourth rounder for Lindgren.
You went full burn
They will wait until Kravtsov quits again and trade for a 7th
Lindgren is not an issue. Rather move some other gross contracts.
Last edited:
Even Bern would only ask for Broberg. Even he wouldn't suggest adding a 1st and top 6 forward. That guys ask was about as laughable as anything I've seen on here.
I don't think anybody accused him of being a number one .
Don’t see how moving a young, effective and cost controlled dman helps this team.
Please. No more proposals from you.
Wow, so if the Rangers were trading for him it would be your first, Trochek and Othmann? Ok sure!
Rangers might get a small overpayment for Lindgren from a contender at the deadline but what you expect is just unreasonable . A top six forward or a top center prospect might already be overpayments Individually depending on the player involved .
If ain't Bern selling, I ain't buying
That is what it would take and how important he is to the Rangers.
SKNJD9
Hi, I'm mat.
You also want to move him before he falls off a cliff from the beating he takes every night, not saying that will be anytime soon though
calder candidate
Registered User
Why would the NYR trade him… they would need to fine a other Top 4 D.
The question should be what people are willing to give the what do the NYR want.
Also aren’t the NYR like a top 6 winger away from being a contender why would they be sellers…
The question should be what people are willing to give the what do the NYR want.
Also aren’t the NYR like a top 6 winger away from being a contender why would they be sellers…
1. OP went way overboard, if we take him verbatim
2. massive overpayment is a no, some level of overpayment is likely to be seen esp if there is competitive bidding, which there would be.
Howev, it is more accurate to say that Lindgren would command top $.
3. Rangers reluctantly deal Lindy b'c they need to squeeze every nickel of cap to keep the young core and their hands are tied 2 more seasons before Trouba and then 2 more seasons after that before we ditch Panarin
Those who insist on win now can continue til the proverbial cows come home, but I am not backing down, I am correct on this pt.
Vatrano was more than worth a 4th, but stupidly was not extended.
Copp was a stupid, feel good, sugar high splurge -- less for the 1st + it cost, but b'c he was also a rental.
NY has to stop shooting itself by playing the likes of Strome and Rooney over Kravtsov.
Vesey has done NOTHING
Deal Vesey, play Kravtsov and not 4th line either
As to Lindy, reluctantly sell high and get Robertson, who has played with Schneider, up here.
I don't care about the effin growin pains that is the cost of business.
You know who beats NYR lately? Boston Bruins. Who plays us tough? NY Islanders.
What do those have in common? Regular lines w/minimum changing as opposed to NYR constant effin jugglin.
Devs got us tonight. I heard somewhere in the 2nd period 15 games or 19 or whatever games, same thing, same lineup.
I was right to insist on keeping Chytil
I was right about not underselling Nils L
And I will likely be right that they better listen to me IMMEDIATELY or Krav will be a self fulfilling prophecy of their own making, which considering the team works for the fans, including me, and squandering a 9OA selection like this is unforgivable, they can bite my ass.
2. massive overpayment is a no, some level of overpayment is likely to be seen esp if there is competitive bidding, which there would be.
Howev, it is more accurate to say that Lindgren would command top $.
3. Rangers reluctantly deal Lindy b'c they need to squeeze every nickel of cap to keep the young core and their hands are tied 2 more seasons before Trouba and then 2 more seasons after that before we ditch Panarin
Those who insist on win now can continue til the proverbial cows come home, but I am not backing down, I am correct on this pt.
Vatrano was more than worth a 4th, but stupidly was not extended.
Copp was a stupid, feel good, sugar high splurge -- less for the 1st + it cost, but b'c he was also a rental.
NY has to stop shooting itself by playing the likes of Strome and Rooney over Kravtsov.
Vesey has done NOTHING
Deal Vesey, play Kravtsov and not 4th line either
As to Lindy, reluctantly sell high and get Robertson, who has played with Schneider, up here.
I don't care about the effin growin pains that is the cost of business.
You know who beats NYR lately? Boston Bruins. Who plays us tough? NY Islanders.
What do those have in common? Regular lines w/minimum changing as opposed to NYR constant effin jugglin.
Devs got us tonight. I heard somewhere in the 2nd period 15 games or 19 or whatever games, same thing, same lineup.
I was right to insist on keeping Chytil
I was right about not underselling Nils L
And I will likely be right that they better listen to me IMMEDIATELY or Krav will be a self fulfilling prophecy of their own making, which considering the team works for the fans, including me, and squandering a 9OA selection like this is unforgivable, they can bite my ass.
Nice to see ya pay attention.
Actually a case can be made that ROUGHLY at present, adjusting that NY has to b'c a bit less cost control, Broberg and Kravtsov have comparables.
Lindgren value will be established by competitive bidding, open market
As a king fan who thinks the kings defense could use some size I would be interested however i doubt king and ranger fans would agree on a price
Lindgren is awesome, NYR should keep him. But, you really want to trade that bum K’Andre Miller to STL. 
Blues fans get to enjoy a LD depth of Nick Leddy, Torrey Krug, Marco Scandella (hurt), Scott Perunovich (hurt), Niko Mikkola (inconsistent) and Calle Rosen (folk-hero/savior). Either guy from NYR would be nice…but you should really think of Fox and keep RL and sell KAM.
Blues fans get to enjoy a LD depth of Nick Leddy, Torrey Krug, Marco Scandella (hurt), Scott Perunovich (hurt), Niko Mikkola (inconsistent) and Calle Rosen (folk-hero/savior). Either guy from NYR would be nice…but you should really think of Fox and keep RL and sell KAM.
Lindgren is one of the last pieces I’d sell. He’s young, he’s probably the only guy on the team who actually should be wearing a letter, his next contract shouldn’t be much of a raise on his current contract and he’s a great match with Fox, who is virtually the only other guy earning his paycheck right now. The list of players I would consider moving before Lindgren includes 13-14 forwards, 3 defenders and 1 of the goalies.
Not because Lindgren is more valuable or better than all of them but because there’s no real point in moving him. We’d just be worse and softer with less of any semblance of leadership.
Zibanejad
Lindgren - Fox
Miller - Schneider
Shesterkin
Are probably the only guys I really wouldn’t be open to moving.
Groo
Registered User
About the same as the NYI paid for Romanov
Ad
Latest posts
-
GDT: GAME 16 | Philly Flies into O-town | Thu Nov 14 2024, 7PM | TSN5, RDS2- Latest: CornerStone61
-
-
-
BRUINS GDT GAME 18 8:08 PM - @ DALLAS - NESN, ESPN+, 98.5 WBZ-FM- Latest: Mick Riddleton
-
