I admit that Hutson's detractors look at fancy stats too much to try and devalue what Hutson has been doing this year.
But there is still quite a substantial kernel of truth to what they're saying.
As he is right now, Hutson is amazing for transition and offensive play, unarguably amongst the elite of the NHL as far as playmaking goes, and he has started being a better defender against the rush.
But Lane Hutson still struggles against the cycle, is similarly downright bad at boxing-out forwards near the net, and not really a good player for battles along the boards.
Hutson has also gotten much better at controlling his turnovers but still commits quite a few of those since he has the puck on his stick so much during the course of a game.
Those are flaws to Hutson's game right now, plain and simple. But he's also only 20, a rookie, and far from a finished product.
With a couple more adjustments here and there, he'll get a lot better defensively and I think will be amongst the elite of the NHL for offensive defenseman for the foreseeable future.
With Hutson's elite hockey IQ and insane work ethic, it is not a good bet to put stakes against him. Hutson's already started to "figure out" how to play a tighter defensive game after only about half-a-season, with more time he'll likely get even better.
So yeah, that's about where I stand on that issue.
Also, this thread should be closed. hutson isn't a prospect anymore and should be treated as a full-time pro, thus being discussed in the "National Hockey League Talk" sub-forum.