Latvia: Latvian prospects

Vikz

Registered User
Dec 26, 2021
181
288
Mateiko and Ansons look really promising for next year's draft. Perhaps 2-3 rounders?
The only time Latvia had two top 100 picks in the draft, both of them became NHLers. So that alone would be a big thing for Latvian hockey.
Its hard to predict those middle-round tallents a year before the draft. Everything will depend on their next season performance.
Mateiko shows that he can easily go PPG + in the next season. QMJHL is kinda overlooked in comparison with OHL and WHL, but his size and playing style should give him edge over other smallish forwards who get skipped in the draft.
Ansons is a few years ahead of other players from the Latvian league. He will probably get selected in the CHL draft this summer. No point in him staying here, and his older brother, who is a Penguins prospect, played in the CHL. So there probably is will, opportunity and connections to go to Canada. There, everything will depend on his production.
Both of them are listed currently as top 100 picks. But theyre both not elite, so it still can go both ways. Depending on the performance of the U18 and U20, someone hopefully joins them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jakub97 and GX

Jakub97

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
55
55
Wish the best for Latvia and let's be optimistic towards the draft. There will be some guys taken and even If not there is a way to get into NHL without being drafted anyway. For example right now Jonathan Marchessault very likely doesn't care and can only laugh with the beer in his left hand meanwhile hugging the Stanley Cup with his right. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vikz

Vikz

Registered User
Dec 26, 2021
181
288
Imo trio Fenenko, Bulans and Rullers will be taken somewhere from in between 4-7. round.
Well, heres your 3-5 guys taken. It was expected, though. I still hoped for the better. But these later rounds are something else.
A goalie from kazakh u-20 league? How is he better than Ozols?
A D from QMJHL with 5 points?
Then again, the last pick was a guy ranked between 60 and 100 by almost every ranking. He was even in attendance. And was barely selected because of 7th round to 7th round pick trade, because Vegas probably had no idea who to pick anymore.
5 belarusian players!! Not a signle missed draft since 2016, with 17 players selected over these 8 years. These guys will soon compete with Slovakia and Germany, while Latvians will be watching the game on TV. At least the Swiss have only one guy this year, and this time, its not even Bichel. So maybe we will have a chance to rival Switzerland one day. Just not for the 7th - 8th place like we hoped for.

Next year should be better. Now, we wait for the CHL draft and see who gets a real chance of getting drafted next year besides Mateiko.
 

Jakub97

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
55
55
Well, heres your 3-5 guys taken. It was expected, though. I still hoped for the better. But these later rounds are something else.
A goalie from kazakh u-20 league? How is he better than Ozols?
A D from QMJHL with 5 points?
Then again, the last pick was a guy ranked between 60 and 100 by almost every ranking. He was even in attendance. And was barely selected because of 7th round to 7th round pick trade, because Vegas probably had no idea who to pick anymore.
5 belarusian players!! Not a signle missed draft since 2016, with 17 players selected over these 8 years. These guys will soon compete with Slovakia and Germany, while Latvians will be watching the game on TV. At least the Swiss have only one guy this year, and this time, its not even Bichel. So maybe we will have a chance to rival Switzerland one day. Just not for the 7th - 8th place like we hoped for.

Next year should be better. Now, we wait for the CHL draft and see who gets a real chance of getting drafted next year besides Mateiko.
Yeah it is bitter. I really believed some Latvians would go...there have been some questionable picks for sure. Anyway this not end and it should only be motivational for all guys who haven't been picked to work even harder.

We've had Jedlička as a late pick who was born in 2002 so don't loose hope. Next year will be better for you.

Wish your country only the best in hockey development.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vikz

garbageteam

Registered User
Jan 7, 2010
1,454
732
5 belarusian players!! Not a signle missed draft since 2016, with 17 players selected over these 8 years. These guys will soon compete with Slovakia and Germany, while Latvians will be watching the game on TV.

Latvia just medaled for the first time ever while Belarus is at least one, if not two entire Olympic cycles away from being allowed to play in a competition again so I wouldn't worry about it. Also not a ton of their picks have panned out from recent years apart from Sharangovich anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jakub97

Jakub97

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
55
55
Who can be realisticly picked in CHL draft this year? Ansons and Ozols? Anybody else?
 

Prizrak

Registered User
Feb 26, 2023
2
4
5 белорусских игроков!! Ни одного пропущенного проекта с 2016 года, за эти 8 лет выбрано 17 игроков.
Yes, we have selected 17 players in 8 years, but we still have a lot to do to get these players to a good level. 99 year of birth - these are the first sprouts of the renewal of the national team, but no one has yet become a player of the required level. Many hopes, but no stability. We are waiting for Levshunov in the draft next year. And the confrontation between Belarus vs Latvia will be tense at any time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vikz

Vikz

Registered User
Dec 26, 2021
181
288
So, four guys drafted in the CHL draft:
#27 Medicine Hat Tigers - Bruno Petrovics (D)
#68 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada - Kristers Ansons (F)
#74 Charlottetown Islanders - Aksels Ozols (G)
#120 Wenatchee Wild - Rodzers Bukarts (F)

A little late for Ozols and Bukarts, who were not picked at this years NHL draft. They will have to outperform themselves to have a chance to be drafted as an overagers, which, to be fair, CHL is all about. Want attention of the scouts - go there. They both had little chance to be noticed from the Swiss and Latvian leagues they are currently playing in.

Petrovics and Ansons are next year draft elegible. Tbh, I was hoping that Ansons will go to the OHL or WHL - it seems like points matter more in them than in the QMJHL, which is a less competitive league. Plus, the team is underwhelming. He might put up good numbers and still get skiped in the NHL draft.
Petrovics is a weird one. His numbers dont seem like a top tallent. 0+0 and -7 in U18 WC are bad even for one of the youngest players on the team. Uljanskis looks like a better tallent in this age group, but I suppose he decided to stay in Sweden.

Anyways, pretty excited to see all of them in the CHL. They rarely draft players unless there is an agreement to come and play, so we will see two more draft eligible players in the most scouted league in the world plus two more guys who got a promotion and have a slight chance to catch up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jakub97

zero100scout

Registered User
Aug 4, 2023
11
4
Latvia
2 Latvian players were included in the Central scouting's preliminary players-to-watch list for the 2024 NHL draft, unless I'm overlooking someone!
Defenseman Darels Uljanskis (AIK U20, in the Swedish J20 nationell) ranked with a B grade (2nd-3rd round)
Forward Eriks Mateiko (Saint John Sea Dogs, QMJHL) ranked with a C grade (4th-5th round)

Otherwise, somewhat surprised to see that HK Zemgale is in the running to get promoted to the top tier of the Finnish U16 leagues, they're currently 1st in their group in the 2nd tier. Emils Brakse and Artis Duklavs look interesting, both lead the team with 21points in 9 games & 17 points in 6 games respectively. Promotion/Relegation series start in the second half of November.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vikz

Vikz

Registered User
Dec 26, 2021
181
288
2 Latvian players were included in the Central scouting's preliminary players-to-watch list for the 2024 NHL draft, unless I'm overlooking someone!
Good: Uljanskis! I had him on the radar last year as the best defender in his age group, but had no idea he would be valued so high. Latvian media does not cover swedish juniors, so it came as a complete surprise that he is in the draft rating, let alone so high. We havent had a defenceman drafted in 9 years, and a 3rd round defenceman in 19 years, since Bartulis.
Bad: Mateiko. I am still considering him a 3rd round pick, even top 50 hopefully. Point per game in QMJHL combined with his size and soft hands should make him a great player. He has all the tools to draw more attention to him in this season.
Ugly: Ansons not making it to the 400 something draft candidates, not even an honorable mention. A year ago he seamed like our best prospect, but slow start in the QMJHL threw him off the radars.

To summarize, its really good to have 2 prospects projected to be drafted, even relatively high by Latvian standards. Its really bad that there is not a single one who could potentially join them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zero100scout

Vikz

Registered User
Dec 26, 2021
181
288
I will continue posting in this dead thread until Latvia overcomes Canada as the main hockey power and there is just no fun in discussing Latvian prospects since all hockey prospects are Latvians.

Latvia quietly had an above average draft. While no one is guaranteed to have a successful career, 3 drafted players is a matched best result in our history.

Mateiko, as expected, was the first drafted Latvian, and the only one who was almost guaranteed to be drafted. At #90, he also went in his projected range, although some experts had him ranked higher and during the season there was even a possibility of a top 50 pick, if he was on a better team and did not injure himself. But eventually, he is in his place, and even at #90, he is the highest drafted Latvian in 9 years. He should tear up the Q next year and make smooth transition to the AHL thanks to his big body and physicality a year later.

I was waiting for Uljanskis to be drafted at about the same time, since he was projected somewhere in the 100's, but Canadiens actually took Vecvanags. Funny that, unlike another Latvian goalie Maurins, Vecvanags was not featured in any pre draft lists, and nobody expected him to be taken in the draft. Maurins did play in J20 Sweden, while Vecvanags - in Latvia. It was probably his better performance in the U18 worlds that caught the eye of Montreal scouts, but even then the 5th round pick seems a bit high. Im not sure what to thing about his potential future in the sport, since he really did not show anything notable during his club career, but then again - so did Shilovs, when he was drafted after the U18. Arturs had, however, significantly better numbers. I would expect Vecvanags to be drafted in the upcoming CHL draft and move to Canada, and then we will have a better understanding of his potential.

By the end of the draft I was preparing another rant on how the NHL completely ignores Latvian defencemen, and how Uljanskis will join 2022 Fenenko and 2023 Bulans as a high potential players skipped in the draft. However, the curse has been lifted by Anaheim and we got our first drafted defenceman in 9 years. He will be the Latvian steal of this draft, since he was taken some 100 positions lower than he should have been. He was a little raw in the U20 and U18 games I saw him in, but his statistics in J20 Sweden look promising and he is really young - 9 months younger than Mateiko.

No other surprise picks, but after last years draught and with only two players expected to be taken, three is a fantastic result. We are one year closer to the Murnieks - Flugins - Berzkalns era, and Osmanis is a potentially high pick next year as well.

Last point of interest is the CHL draft, although CHL, as a path to the draft and NHL, is worse with every year. Still looking forward to it, though.
 

Vikz

Registered User
Dec 26, 2021
181
288
A whole bunch of nothing in this CHL draft, despite four guys taken. I was really hoping for some underaged guys like Serkins, who was fantastic this year at the U18, but might stagnate in Switzerlands underwhelming juniors, or 16-17 year olds from Latvian league. Instead:
Cjunskis, an overager;
Feldbergs, an overager.

Im happy for Feldbergs, he had a fantastic season in Latvia, but failed miserably at U20. I dont know what kind of a career he plans to have in NA - most likely, two average seasons and, hopefully, CZE2 or Mestis. Same with Cjunskis.

Vecvanags was expected to move to NA after the draft. At least, he has an organisation, who will manage his development and might find a spot for him if he is decent.

Flugins is the only one who I might have been excited about being drafted if he wasnt already feeling good in Sweden. He should be producing at high pace at J20, and even might make it to Allsvenskan. No need for him to rush to NA.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad