Jersey Fan 12
Positive Vibes
- Nov 20, 2006
- 7,254
- 3,168
What you need to write now is 'sorry, I misunderstood you', and nothing else.Your post was useless and without any added value.
We all know Komuls was selected by Vitolins, because he's on the team.
Think before you post.
He thinks he's Gaudreau or Zegras. He's built like a tank, he does have a low center of mass and he does use it while dangling around and skating around the O zone to maintain possession.Agreed on Bukarts, hard disagree on Daugaviņš. Dudes a tank, no way anybody would classify as "soft" hes also one of the leaders of this at the ripe old age of 35(!)
Who would you replace him with? Nobody really comes to mind to be honest. Not in the nearest future, anyhow.He thinks he's Gaudreau or Zegras. He's built like a tank, he does have a low center of mass and he does use it while dangling around and skating around the O zone to maintain possession.
But he plays laterally, he tries to make fancy plays, he is not driven by efficiency, he doesn't drive to the net or actually use his body close to the net, he opts for the fancy play instead of making the obvious one, his shot is not great, he's not a great playmaker, he overpasses and overwaits on breakaways. He does not use the puck efficiently. And he is getting slower every year.
I'm OK with him being a 2nd or 3rd line wing, but the main scoring threat on the top line or PP1? No thanks.
Balcers.Who would you replace him with? Nobody really comes to mind to be honest. Not in the nearest future, anyhow.
Balcers and who else on the line? Im assuming you are counting on our NHL players being there for the team?Balcers.
The Abols-Daugavins line should be the 2nd line in August and they should be paired up with an actual top6 winger. Even Indrasis would be a better option than Dzierkals/Krastenbergs. Indrasis was useless on the 3rd line.
Obviously, yes. Balcers-Blueger-Tralmaks would be a great top line, with Tralmaks adding some size and physicality. Just add someone with actual skill to complement then.Balcers and who else on the line? Im assuming you are counting on our NHL players being there for the team?
So in ideal scenario offense would something likeObviously, yes. Balcers-Blueger-Tralmaks would be a great top line, with Tralmaks adding some size and physicality. Just add someone with actual skill to complement then.
I wouldn't call Indrasis on the 2nd line ideal, but he would be an actual threat against the opposition we're facing, which is why we also need secondary scoring from the 3rd line so I'm not sure about Girgensons at 3C.So in ideal scenario offense would something like
Balcers-Bļugers-Tralmaks(?)
Daugaviņš-Ābols-Indrašis(?)
Ķēniņš-Girgensons-Ri.Bukarts( this would be a great energy line)
Dzierkals-Batņa-Ločmelis(maybe?)
This was maybe his best game so far too, and it wasn’t all that great. Don’t know what you do with him in elimination besides hope something clicks. He’s never been a burner but he looks straight up slower than the depth guys he’s been facing the past few games, and his passes aren’t even fooling 3rd pair defenders.As a ducks fan.. Im dissapointed in Zegras.. He should be much better. Dude is always in his own way.