Toggle sidebar

GDT: LAT vs. USA May 21, 2024

I honestly don't think this Latvia team is capable of pulling an upset. This roster lacks a little bit of depth and the decision-making of some our depth players will lead to several really bad unforced errors, guaranteed. And our PP sucks.

So the whole 'score a cheeky goal and try to not concede' thing is not working for us this year.
 
Please, don't ever call up Komuls again. I don't think he even belongs in the ECHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LKI
HockeyinLV said:
Our defensive depth is literally non existant.
Click to expand...
No, that's not it. Selecting Komuls in the first place was an interesting choice. He has been consistently making boneheaded plays and losing the puck for no reason. He can't make a pass or receive a pass. It's not that there is no depth, it's that we literally don't need him on the ice or on the team. We have 7 other defencemen.

It has been painfully obvious from the first game that he's a liability. Our 8D Bergmanis has been better both this year and before.

And the one thing that strikes me this year is the inability of our coaching staff to make some very obvious and needed changes to our lineup. Like removing Ansons the f*** out of 4C or moving Dzierkals off the top line or getting Tralmaks into the top 6, PP1/PP2.

It only took them 6 games to finally have Tralmaks on the PP. He's literally the only guy other than Abols who is capable of making space for himself in the offensive zone and making some actual plays to endanger the net. Our 2nd best forward in this tournament still plays on the 4th line. Why?

Daugavins just uses the space given to him to dangle the puck and lose it eventually. Tralmaks is exactly what they need on the top line.
 
Namejs said:
No, that's not it. Selecting Komuls in the first place was an interesting choice. He has been consistently making boneheaded plays and losing the puck for no reason. He can't make a pass or receive a pass. It's not that there is no depth, it's that we literally don't need him on the ice or on the team. We have 7 other defencemen.

It has been painfully obvious from the first game that he's a liability. Our 8D Bergmanis has been better both this year and before.

And the one thing that strikes me this year is the inability of our coaching staff to make some very obvious and needed changes to our lineup. Like removing Ansons the f*** out of 4C or moving Dzierkals off the top line or getting Tralmaks into the top 6, PP1/PP2.

It only took them 6 games to finally have Tralmaks on the PP. He's literally the only guy other than Abols who is capable of making space for himself in the offensive zone and making some actual plays to endanger the net. Our 2nd best forward in this tournament still plays on the 4th line. Why?

Daugavins just uses the space given to him to dangle the puck and lose it eventually. Tralmaks is exactly what they need on the top line.
Click to expand...
What do you think about removal of Ābols from the coaching staff? It seems it has changed our play and unfortunatley for the worse.
 
Can't watch the game now but the defence is certainly very bad this year. We are missing three people from last year and it's definitely felt. If not Komuls, than we'll have too look for guys playing in NCAA, Denmark, France or Norway. Basically pick your poison. I would think that NCAA would be a good enough league but we had Bergmanis being tried and he lost to Komuls, so Vītoliņš must have found him even worse?

There will be two young defensemen playing in top Finnish league next year, hope at least one of them breaks out.
 
Last edited:
Dofs said:
Bergmanis was tried and he lost to Komuls, so Vītoliņš must have found him even worse?
Click to expand...
I think the only reason Komuls plays and was selected to begin with is because he's a rightie. They decided "we're going to have a bad player anyway so might as well the one who plays the "right" hand" but is that really of any merit is obviously debatable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boss Man Hughes, Namejs, Dofs and 1 other person
Namejs said:
No, that's not it. Selecting Komuls in the first place was an interesting choice. He has been consistently making boneheaded plays and losing the puck for no reason. He can't make a pass or receive a pass. It's not that there is no depth, it's that we literally don't need him on the ice or on the team. We have 7 other defencemen.

It has been painfully obvious from the first game that he's a liability. Our 8D Bergmanis has been better both this year and before.

And the one thing that strikes me this year is the inability of our coaching staff to make some very obvious and needed changes to our lineup. Like removing Ansons the f*** out of 4C or moving Dzierkals off the top line or getting Tralmaks into the top 6, PP1/PP2.

It only took them 6 games to finally have Tralmaks on the PP. He's literally the only guy other than Abols who is capable of making space for himself in the offensive zone and making some actual plays to endanger the net. Our 2nd best forward in this tournament still plays on the 4th line. Why?

Daugavins just uses the space given to him to dangle the puck and lose it eventually. Tralmaks is exactly what they need on the top line.
Click to expand...
Kaļķis much better than Komuls.

As I write this - again he has a brainfart.
 
And why the hell we are using Tralmaks on the PP as a in front of a goal big body guy? Why not use him where he is at his best on the right side in a one timer spot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Namejs
Zegras is honestly so stupid, Nelson has been quite lazy today as well
 
Dofs said:
Can't watch the game now but the defence is certainly very bad this year. We are missing three people from last year and it's definitely felt. If not Komuls, than we'll have too look for guys playing in NCAA, Denmark, France or Norway. Basically pick your poison. I would think that NCAA would be a good enough league but we had Bergmanis being tried and he lost to Komuls, so Vītoliņš must have found him even worse?

There will be two young defensemen playing in top Finnish league next year, hope at least one of them breaks out.
Click to expand...
I guess junior hockey is not your thing. We have multiple D prospects coming up and they will probably get a taste of the Worlds next year. The Finnish ones are depth players.

Your point about Komuls-Bergmanis is circular and useless. But if you haven't seen any of the games, that would explain it.
 
Namejs said:
I guess junior hockey is not your thing. We have multiple D prospects coming up and they will probably get a taste of the Worlds next year. The Finnish ones are depth players.

Your point about Komuls-Bergmanis is circular and useless. But if you haven't seen any of the games, that would explain it.
Click to expand...
Let those players leave juniors first.

What point about Komuls-Bergmanis are you talking about? That Vītoliņš chose Komuls over Bergmanis? You have a different opinion? :oops:
 
I think that 5on3 gave me an aneurysm.

I know this will sound sacrilegous, but I can't wait for the RoBukarts and Daugavins era to be over. They don't really fit the philosophy of this team. Soft, slow and dangly barely even works against your polands of this day and age.
 
Dofs said:
Let those players leave juniors first.

What point about Komuls-Bergmanis are you talking about? That Vītoļiņš chose Komuls over Bergmanis? You have a different opinion? :oops:
Click to expand...
You're not watching the game, but 'Bergmanis must be worse, because Vitolins made that decision 2 weeks ago. Why is he worse? Because Vitolins selected Komuls.'

What kind of a mickey mouse argument is that? If you have nothing to contribute, get back to work and gtfo with this mickey mouse BS
 
Namejs said:
I think that 5on3 gave me an aneurysm.

I know this will sound sacrilegous, but I can't wait for the RoBukarts and Daugavins era to be over. They don't really fit the philosophy of this team. Soft, slow and dangly barely even works against your polands of this day and age.
Click to expand...
Agreed on Bukarts, hard disagree on Daugaviņš. Dudes a tank, no way anybody would classify as "soft" hes also one of the leaders of this at the ripe old age of 35(!)
 
Namejs said:
You're not watching the game, but 'Bergmanis must be worse, because Vitolins made that decision 2 weeks ago. Why is he worse? Because Vitolins selected Komuls.'

What kind of a mickey mouse argument is that? If you have nothing to contribute, get back to work and gtfo with this mickey mouse BS
Click to expand...
Lol what? You are making stuff up, I've written that Vītoliņš thinks he is worse, I've never said that I think he is worse.

Don't post while drunk.
 
Dofs said:
Lol what? You are making stuff up, I've written that Vītoliņš thinks he is worse, I've never said that think he is worse.

Don't post while drunk.
Click to expand...
Your post was useless and without any added value.

We all know Komuls was selected by Vitolins, because he's on the team.

Think before you post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom