All the Money in the World is a hard one to rate. It takes a lot of liberty with the actual event, and yet, it still cannot deliver a compelling story. Everything seems to fall into place conveniently, and I am quite bored by it, as a result. Still, I have to wonder how much does that have to do with the re-shoots. While I understand that the studio probably just want to salvage whatever they can from it, it probably have been a better idea to either scrap the whole thing, or shoot it again, because it seems rushed and a little bit incoherent. Frankly, it often feels like two different movies slapped together at times.
Like the movie, Mark Wahlberg is a complete enigma. Why does he pick roles that are basically useless to the advancement of the plot? It happened in Patriots Day, and it happens again in All the Money in the World. Even without his character, both movies will reach the exact same conclusion, because he adds absolutely nothing to the plot. I also do not understand the praise for Plummer. It is just a typical Plummer performance, and his version of Getty is quite plain. Personally, I thought Spacey's version in the trailers is a lot more interesting, but again, I understand that he has to be replaced, in light of all the accusations against him. Thus, I still think it may have been better to just write the movie off completely, because it will save a lot of headaches.
That said, it is not all that bad, as Michelle Williams continues to deliver what is asked of her. The way she is paid a lot less than Wahlberg is just criminal, because she is the only good thing to come out of this mess. Who would have thought the girl from Dawson's Creek would develop into such a fine actress?
I give it a 4/10. The mise-en-scene is beautiful, and Williams gives a great performance, but those two are not enough to warrant a viewing. It can be skipped, unless you are really, really curious.