Langdon Alger
Registered User
- Apr 19, 2006
- 24,777
- 12,915
Loved it. Watched it many times.
Yeah, I might go with a different ending though. Chris deserved to get caught.
Loved it. Watched it many times.
He pulled a LOT of string behind the scenes in many high quality films and he inserted himself into those movies. If those films hadn't been classics, he likely would have disappeared - like so many before him. Fortunately for Beatty, Splendor In Grass, Bonnie and Clyde, and McCabe and Mrs Miller propelled him into super stardom.
All true.Yeah, the behind-the-scene influences are often overlooked, and he made his own success. His closest comparable is probably Michael Douglas then, but even though I am not a fan of Douglas myself, I will say that Douglas brings a lot more to the table than Beatty.
Quite frankly, Beatty really is not special at all. Heck, he is not even the best performer in his family. That honour goes to Shirley MacLaine.
I saw it tonight, and found it entertaining and relevant, too. I had some problems, though, especially with the way the film attempts to "balance" responsibility between the police and Tom Hayden, employing largely a fiction to do so. But even though it took about a half century longer than it should have, The Trial of the Chicago Seven does give a sense of what was at stake and what the authorities attempted violently to repress. I'd advise no one to take this movie as real history, though--there are just too many misrepresentations of events evident in the work. Movies tend to do that, but people can take them at face value, even institutions that should know better. I remember a couple of decades ago visiting family in Michigan and casually watching something called the "History" channel, which I assumed meant "real" history. The channel was running John Wayne's The Green Berets. I found that bitterly funny. Anyway for anyone interested in some of the central discrepancies between The Trial of the Chicago Seven and what actually occurred, this article gives at least a partial summary.Watched The Trial of the Chicago Seven last night and thought it was phenomenal. I didn't know much about the story (not American and relatively young), it was enthralling and left you bitter at the system. Sacha Baron Cohen was phenomenal. I'll give it an 8/10.
I saw it tonight, and found it entertaining and relevant, too. I had some problems, though, especially with the way the film attempts to "balance" responsibility between the police and Tom Hayden, employing largely a fiction to do so. But even though it took about a half century longer than it should have, The Trial of the Chicago Seven does give a sense of what was at stake and what the authorities attempted violently to repress. I'd advise no one to take this movie as real history, though--there are just too many misrepresentations of events evident in the work. Movies tend to do that, but people can take them at face value, even institutions that should know better. I remember a couple of decades ago visiting family in Michigan and casually watching something called the "History" channel, which I assumed meant "real" history. The channel was running John Wayne's The Green Berets. I found that bitterly funny. Anyway for anyone interested in some of the central discrepancies between The Trial of the Chicago Seven and what actually occurred, this article gives at least a partial summary.
Netflix's 'The Trial of the Chicago 7': Separating fact from fiction
Memories of Underdevelopment (1968) Directed by Tomas Guiterrez Alea 8B
If you asked a serious film buff to name five films from Caribbean countries, I’d bet a lot of money that he or she couldn’t do it. While film has exploded just about everywhere on the planet, the Caribbean remains a desert in an otherwise fertile garden. However, there are a handful of worthy films, and Memories of Underdevelopment is among the best of them. Covering the period from the victory of the Cuban revolution in 1959 to the dawning of the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, Memories of Underdevelopment is the story of Sergio Mendoza, an intellectual who decides to stay in Cuba after the revolution despite his complete dissatisfaction with and even rancor toward the regime. Much of the movie consists of Sergio’s monologues as he observes the world around him, his internal musings becoming a central part of his character development. Director Tomas Guiterrez Alea seems to take his approach from the French New Wave, specifically Jean Luc Godard’s political and experimental works (I don’t know this for a fact, but it sure looks that way). He combines dramatic scenes with archival footage, documentary images and scenes where actors take part in real situations as a means of showing both the depth of Sergio’s malaise but, also, interestingly, the character flaws of Sergio himself. In fact, Sergio becomes something of a portrait of the clueless intellectual—a man who thinks complex thoughts about existence but whose personal behaviour is hardly above reproach. Memories of Underdevelopment is an innovative look at post-revolutionary Cuban history as well as at the limitations of certain intellectuals who recognize their alienation but who choose to do little but complain about it.
subtitles
Criterion Channel
Nocturne (2020):
"Women don’t trust women, men don’t trust women…no-one trusts women." - Oscar Wilde
Two sisters compete over a boy, a prestigious position at Juilliard and a future in classical music. The sisters give each other dirty looks and stab each other in the back for 90 long minutes.
Nocturne is an overacted, overwritten film that fails to deliver on any level.
2/10
You chose wisely.Oh, good, I almost watched it tonight, but chose to go with:
The Void (Gillepsie & Kostanski, 2016) - A fun ride for any fan of 80s horror. It's just a dumb horror film, done well - it borrows from quite a few films, but subtly enough to do without the bullshit nostalgia and obvious throwbacks. If you used to enjoy body horror and don't mind some level of incoherence, I say go for it. 6/10
I just barely passed my own test. I have seen five and can't name any others, two from Cuba, Memories of Underdevelopment and Juan of the Dead; two from Jamaica, The Harder They Come and Rockers; and one from the Dominican Republic, Cristo Rey, which popped up at TIFF a few years back. Caribbean movies are rare birds.I tried to take up your challenge, and you are right. I have probably seen around four movies from Caribbean countries, and I actually cannot name half of them.
I also find that almost all of them are from Cuba too. The film industries are just vastly underdeveloped in many of the other countries, unfortunately, and the people there probably have more pressing concerns to deal with.
I saw it tonight, and found it entertaining and relevant, too. I had some problems, though, especially with the way the film attempts to "balance" responsibility between the police and Tom Hayden, employing largely a fiction to do so. But even though it took about a half century longer than it should have, The Trial of the Chicago Seven does give a sense of what was at stake and what the authorities attempted violently to repress. I'd advise no one to take this movie as real history, though--there are just too many misrepresentations of events evident in the work. Movies tend to do that, but people can take them at face value, even institutions that should know better. I remember a couple of decades ago visiting family in Michigan and casually watching something called the "History" channel, which I assumed meant "real" history. The channel was running John Wayne's The Green Berets. I found that bitterly funny. Anyway for anyone interested in some of the central discrepancies between The Trial of the Chicago Seven and what actually occurred, this article gives at least a partial summary.
Netflix's 'The Trial of the Chicago 7': Separating fact from fiction
I've got it top-4 for sure. Eyes Wide Shut first, then you could go with 2001, Strangelove and The Shining in pretty much any order. I know you adore Lolita, but I'd have it at 5 or 6 with Clockwork Orange, and then somewhat of a drop.