Blackhawkswincup
RIP Fugu
Martin
Underrated and sadly largely forgotten Romero classic
Martin
Though not part of the exploitation film boom, Paul Cox is the guy to explore from Australia. Little, lovely, human movies--very underrated director. Suggested starting point: Man of Flowers.Not Quite Hollywood.
This doc is about 10 years old, but it focuses on Australia's exploitation film boom of the 70s and 80s. Beyond Mad Max, BMX Bandits and Howling 3, I really hadn't heard of many of any of the movies discussed here. Fun doc though. You get a little film and social history, plus a plethora of ridiculous clips from all sorts of entertaining (well seemingly entertaining) grindhouse fare. If anyone has seen Electric Boogaloo, the documentary a few years ago about Canon Films, this covers similar ground albeit from a different country. I didn't know it going into Not Quite Hollywood, but it turns out they had the same director. Safe to say I left this movie with a list of about 10 other movies I want to track down at some point.
Yes, I completely agree with this review, and I honestly think this is likely the best film I have seen all year.
A friend of mine has a completely different opinion though. For her, the way the Kims are able to integrate into the Park family is very unrealistic, due to the lack of a background check, and she can just never get over the perceived plot hole. It just completely ruined the movie for her, and she cannot get into the plot as a result.
Honestly, I can see her point of view. However, everything else is so well-done, that I can easily ignore that little hitch, because it feels minor in the grand scheme of things.
Plot hole? I dunno...they all had forged documents and phony credentials and the Parks were just gullible and shallow. Even the mother got the housekeeping job because Mr. Park was impressed by the design and the "classy" paper stock of a fake business card. That's all it took. And being snobs they didn't think "chauffeur" or "housekeeper" were important enough jobs to do a serious background check. Worked for me.
Rust Creek (2019) - 5/10 (Didn't like or dislike it)
A female college student (Hermione Corfield) gets lost in rural Kentucky and is assaulted and chased by a couple of hillbilly meth heads. This low budget independent film is not very original and feels a bit like Deliverance crossed with Winter's Bone. There also isn't a whole lot of story and it's rather predictable. I was never wondering where it was going, only waiting for it to get there. That said, it's shot and acted very well. It's much more of a Sundance type of film than an exploitation film. It doesn't try to shock or rally viewers (i.e. it's not a rape revenge movie). It's a well executed film that, unfortunately, has a basic, familiar story and doesn't really add anything to the genre. It's not a bad film and you could do worse if you're looking for something to watch, but I can't really recommend it, either.
By the Grace of God (2019) Directed by Francois Ozun 7A
Alexandre discovers that the priest who abused him as a child is still involved with children despite his initial censure. First he goes to the local Church authorities who are helpful in their way, but only up to a certain point, ready to accept some responsibility but not willing to do much about it. As Alexandre continues his struggle to get the priest removed from having anything to do with children, other men, with stories of sexual assault of their own, become involved, and what was once a story of one man seeking justice develops much broader implications. Scrupulously devoted to actual accounts, By the Grace of God is France's Spotlight, a film that focuses on pedophile priests and the great harm that they do. While Francois Ozun, whose movies are usually anything but weighty, seems an unusual choice for director, he places the emphasis right where it belongs, on the victims and their trauma. The movie has a few problems. It is subtitle heavy as much of the initial dialogue comes from letters that are traded back and forth between Alexandre and the Church authorities. For the first third of the movie, it seems like we are watching one man's quest for justice, so that when the movie shifts to incorporate a much broader perspective it comes as a bit of a jarring surprise initially. But Ozun is very good at quietly focusing on the human cost and the unwillingness of the religious authorities to act unless they are prodded. Despite an approach that is non-sensational, every so often the movie will pull off a sequence that has such tension and power that I was sitting there going "Whoa, where did that come from?" The movie doesn't rely too much on these bravura moments to make its points, a credit to Ozun and his concern not to overshadow the stories with cinematic effects or melodramatic bombast. But their inclusion gives the viewer a clear hint of the hell these men have gone through and continue to suffer.
subtitles
*Ozon!
Haven't seen that one, and won't for some time probably, but he hasn't done a really good film since the early 2000s. Used to be an unsung genius, or at least an underdog.
Too sweeping a condemnation of Ozon's more recent movies. While I actively hated Potiche and A New Friend and felt middle-of-the-road about In the House, I think Young & Beautiful and Frantz are really good movies. I sometimes think his movies are so French that they just don't travel that well, but he remains a director of consequence as far as I am concerned.*Ozon!
Haven't seen that one, and won't for some time probably, but he hasn't done a really good film since the early 2000s. Used to be an unsung genius, or at least an underdog.
Wow, I think that is really, really underrating Pattinson here. Like many basically two-actor movies, for the film to work both actors need to be strong so they can actively play off one another. I think that is definitely the case here. The Lighthouse would not be so effective, to me anyway, if both actors weren't each pulling their share of the load. I think Pattinson did a really good job of playing off the ambiguity of his character--sometimes seeming relatively normal, though tortured about something; sometimes seeming a psychotic waiting for an opportunity. His character and the movie are dependent upon Pattinson's ability to communicate the corrosive nature of his sense of guilt and on that score I thought Pattinson was borderline brilliant.As for the performances, Dafoe is great as usual, Pattinson is merely serviceable. Now, he does not weight the movie down, but I see it more as a carry job by Dafoe.