Fair enough and thanks.Reviews overall seem mixed, but I have a big problem with the handling of the female journalist character in the movie which has been reported on extensively. They portray her as exchanging sex for information for stories. Haven't seen anything to contradict this yet, so I'll trust what I've heard. That's not only an EXTREMELY lazy and offensive cliche regardless, but there's no actual evidence that the reporter portrayed in the movie who was a real person whose name they use ever did that. The real woman died in 2011 and isn't around to defend herself. Jewell's lawyer even came out today and said that's untrue.
It is absolutely true that the media had a lot of failings during the reporting of the Richard Jewell case. They don't need to concoct nasty, lazy, untrue things to enhance the argument. Just really gross and offensive to me. Probably also worth noting that while Jewell sued and settled multiple court cases with media outlets, he actually lost the one against the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (where the reporter portayed worked).
The crazy thing to me is the screenplay was written by Billy Ray who wrote and directed one of the better movies about journalism in the past 20 years or so -- Shattered Glass.
Lol I wanted to like it, I really did. I LOVE 2001, I wasn't necessarily expecting a similar movie, but at least a similar kind of response to it. What's the thought on 2001 vs. Solaris? Around the same time and it feels like they always get brought up together.
The Body Remembers When the World Broke Open (2019) Directed by Elle-Maija Tailfeathers and Kathleen Hepburn 7B
I sure can't complain about #s 1 and 2 . Damn good list, terrific presentation.Decent list. Can't argue with their top pick
I think this is a little over the top, but you nail a lot of Baumbach's weaknesses. Though I liked Marriage Story a lot, Baumbach can be very glib and contrived, and he seems to get a lot of his moves from other directors. For my two cents, I thought that the two leads did an excellent job, but that almost all the other characters were one dimensional types.Gave a shot to Marriage Story by Noah Baumbach. I think I actively loathe him as an artist. Outside of a fine monologue by Scarlett Johansson's character regarding her view of her relationship with Charlie, I thought the writing was a total disaster (although I did appreciate the detailed approach to the lawter search and games) but boy, it's really hard to indulge a film that looks to think its smarter than it is make fun of people who think they're smarter than they are. I thought it a limp film that tried so very hard to be funny without ever landing because Baumbach has no genuine comic sensibilities. He's too soft and vanilla, so his constant attempts at upper middle-class quirkisms fare no better than what you'll in a Sarah Jessica Parker project or Friends or any of those destructive, rotten shows and nor did I think the leads has any chemistry, while the support characters were simply impossible. It was hard to feel much sympathy or loathing for the leads. All I felt was a sort of lethargic disdain. Just about nothing had me going. I don't think Baumbach is much of anything as an author or director. In the marriage drama genre, I much prefer Blue Valentine or A Woman Under the Influence. While in the family tragedy/drama genre, I'll forever tip my hat to the superb Horace and Pete by Louis CK. That was a great piece of effective writing.
Black Christmas [2019] :
Who knew the title, an attack on a Christian holiday, would be the least offensive part of this movie, as we watch every white guy battle to be the biggest piece of garbage.
Black Christmas is even worse, and more confusing, than you'd expect. It may be the worst slasher movie I've ever seen... and that's saying a lot.
0/10
Osprey said:I finally watched Black Christmas (1974) for the first time last night. I enjoyed it more than I expected. There's something about those 1970s horror films that are just so "classy" (for lack of a better word) compared to nearly everything from 1980 onward. Even when the films don't have much point or substance, like this and Halloween, you still feel the care put into the art of the films (the atmosphere, camerawork, editing, details and so on). That's something that you don't get much of after the 1970s, when horror films (especially slasher flicks) became less about competent filmmaking and more about shock value and hurrying from one gratuitous scene to the next. This one also has a somewhat unique ending, which is a rarity in the genre.
I'll watch the panned 2006 remake tonight or tomorrow, which should make for an interesting comparison. I expect it to lose everything good about the original and be an example of the worst, most unoriginal aspects of modern horror, but I must satisfy my curiosity. EDIT: Yeah, that wasn't good. It maybe wasn't quite as bad in some ways that I expected, but largely made up for it by being stupid in ways that I hadn't expected. It's quite forgettable, whereas the original is more memorable and something that I'd like to eventually watch again.
Thanks! I will check out the original.I really don't think that the title is an attack. It's simply a play on "White Christmas," the title of a movie and song that are both strictly secular. Playing on a Christmas song title or lyrics is simply an easy way to communicate that it's a Christmas movie and generate interest. Besides, the title was coined for the 1974 original. If anyone was trying to be offensive, it's the impolite Canadians who made that 45 years ago. This movie is a remake (the second, in fact) of that classic, so it was natural to re-use the name.
Maybe, if you hadn't pre-judged it from the title and had gone into it with a more open mind, you might've ended up giving it... oh... a 2/10, instead .
If you haven't seen the 1974 original, I recommend it. It's a horror classic. I watched it for the first time a few years ago and I liked it. In fact, I just found my review of it in the horror movie discussion thread:
Decent list. Can't argue with their top pick
I sure can't complain about #s 1 and 2. Damn good list, terrific presentation.
Marriage Story...
If anyone was trying to be offensive, it's the impolite Canadians who made that 45 years ago.
As for the title... I realize it is a play on words but a lot of Christians are offended - and we don't offend easy.
That isn't true. We do offend easily . I used to think that "Xmas" was offensive because I assumed that it was a deliberate removing of "Christ" from the name. It took someone correcting me and me doing some research before I realized that it's been common (and respectful) short hand for the holiday for hundreds of years. In other words, I've done the same thing as you, so I figured that it'd be better if I gave my perspective before you received replies that weren't quite as nice (not that you seem to mind such replies ).
I don't see much fighting in THIS thread. Other ones, yes, but posters here seem to be respectful of each other.
A Rainy Day In New York (2019) - 7/10 - It was half stupid and half good so it evens out, poor casting choice for leads though
Don't remember who I was talking about but I'd take a guess that it was this guy:Bolshoi Ballet: The Nutcracker (2019)
3.50 out of 4stars
I will start this off by saying I have no knowledge or experience of ballet, so I really have nothing to directly compare this to. That said, this surpassed my expectations easily. The elegance, the flow, the visuals, the fantasy, of course the iconic music, whom some consider Tchaikovsky's best and/or most famous work, and story were perfectly on point. Not to mention, art and execution by the ballet dancers is something special itself given the necessary training, flexibility, stamina, and likely injuries I can imagine in this field. Before I saw this I think I read it was the most revenue generating ballet in North America, as an fyi. Slightly off topic, Kihei I know posted about some "wunderkind" male ballet dancer some while ago, if anyone remembers who that was, I would be appreciative of exploring that for a little while.