Movies: Last Movie You Watched and Rate it | New Year New thread

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) - 8/10

I watched this for the 20th time tonight (with my nephew for his 1st time) and don't usually review re-watches, but someone recently besmirched this film and I feel like defending it. Sure, it's not as great as 'Raiders' or 'Last Crusade' and, sure, it has some dodgy special effects, underwhelming villains and an annoying main character, but it's still a very entertaining film, especially in its action-packed final act, and it has its heart in the right place (if you know what I mean). This unashamedly nostalgic Gen-Xer really enjoyed it and felt like a kid again, so there.
 
Last edited:
blackboxdiaries.jpg


Black Box Diaries (2024) Directed by Shiori Ito 8B (documentary)

Journalist Shiori Ito is raped by a powerful media executive in a Tokyo hotel. Rather than remain silent, she goes on the offensive to investigate her own rape and to share her experience in a book she writes about the incident. Bravely, she takes on Japan's patriarchal social system that still fosters notions that shame and silence should be a woman's appropriate response to such an assault. Slowly her story gains traction, and after being rebuffed by the criminal courts which are subject to political influence she successfully begins a civil action that forces change upon an antiquated system that has in the past preferred to look the other way when sexual violence is perpetrated by the rich and powerful.

While this Oscar-nominated documentary which Ito herself directs may sound like a chore to watch, Black Box Diaries is anything but that. It moves quickly like a good police procedural. Ito is a very strong presence who possesses some personal resources that help her battle her society's expectations. She is young, articulate, vibrant, stylish, and media savvy. And fearless. She musters enough public camera footage, in-person interviews and taped phone conversations to make her case a convincing one, so much so that according to Time magazine she becomes one of the most influential young people in the world. Occasionally her public poise is contrasted starkly with her private doubts and anguish about her circumstance. But she sees her difficult task through to the end and is eventually victorious. Hers is a gripping story from start to finish, and it makes for one hell of a compelling documentary.

Sidenote: Black Box Diaries currently has a score of 98% on Rotten Tomatoes (64 positive reviews out of 65)

some subtitles
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeppo
Universal Language (dir. Matthew Rankin, 2024)

Matthew Rankin’s Universal Language is an oddity in the best way—a film that feels like a lost artifact from a timeline where Winnipeg is the cultural crossroads of the world and Quebec has seceded just to make life more absurd. With its fragmented narrative, deadpan humor, and playful surrealism, it carries the spirit of an offbeat travelogue through a country that only exists in the margins of reality.

The film’s structure is deceptively loose, weaving between disparate characters who all seem to be searching for something—lost money frozen in ice, a sense of belonging, or just a coherent tour guide in the ever-shifting Winnipeg landscape. Rankin’s background in experimental filmmaking is on full display, blending moments of documentary realism with hilariously stilted dialogue and dreamlike detours. The influence of Abbas Kiarostami looms large, not just in the Iranian elements, but in the way Rankin frames his characters against an environment that often feels both mundane and mythic.

At times, Universal Language leans a little too hard into its own absurdity, and its disconnected structure occasionally loses momentum. Some of the humor lands perfectly, while other moments feel like inside jokes waiting for an audience that may never arrive. But even when it meanders, the film’s off-kilter charm remains undeniable. It’s a film about people stuck between places—between languages, between cultures, between narratives that refuse to resolve cleanly.

Not everything here translates perfectly, but that’s kind of the point. Rankin has crafted something weirdly poetic—an ode to displacement, miscommunication, and the strange beauty of being lost in translation.

 
Perfect Days (2023) is a very good film about a guy who just wants to enjoy life working as a janitor. The movie is pretty simple and details a few days in his life. It can be pretty monotonous but it is indeed interesting.

8/10
When I was a kid, my dream job was to be a toll booth operator. Sit there, smoke cigarettes, listen to the radio and push a little button that makes the gate go up.

40 years later .. f***ing wish I got that job as a toll booth operator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nakatomi and kihei
When I was a kid, my dream job was to be a toll booth operator. Sit there, smoke cigarettes, listen to the radio and push a little button that makes the gate go up.

40 years later .. f***ing wish I got that job as a toll booth operator.

but what about when you work that job for 30 years, and they give you a watch and kick you in the butt and tell you, hey a computer took your place daddy, that's Hard Times

 
  • Like
Reactions: Tasty Biscuits
Queen & Slim - 4/10

Just caught this one yesterday and was really disappointed. It had a lot of potential and it was just flat out bad. The characters do no behave like the rational human beings they're supposed to be. Some of the events were extremely exaggerated and they just didn't need to be because it pushed the film into cartoonish at points. There were some really great moments but they almost always were followed by a dud. The runtime was about 30 minutes too long (it has a 2:12 runtime). When I hit the one hour mark and realized I had another hour to go I was really disappointed, that's how badly it dragged. I couldn't recommend this movie to anyone, there are better options that hit similar notes.

Rant incoming for those who have seen it:

This woman is supposed to be an attorney and is constantly making the dumbest decisions imaginable. Both of their decision making is so beyond ridiculous. They travel from Cleveland to New Orleans? Why? That's a 16 hour drive when Cleveland is incredibly close to the Canadian border. They stole the pickup truck of a sheriff and were able to drive that undetected to New Orleans? I'm just not buying it. Fine, she wants to meet up with her criminal kin, whatever. The Mexican border and Florida are similar distances from New Orleans so I'm not sure why they chose a path that required them to have a plane. Also, why do they need a plane? I just kept thinking they should get a boat or go to Mexico where those sort of logistical problems don't exist.

Then there's all the meandering around. They randomly decide to stop off for beverages at some dive bar with live music in the middle of nowhere and every single person in the bar recognizes them? Absurd. Then they randomly veer off the path to go to a cemetery? Then they have sex at the cemetery? They stop to ride a horse? They failed in two different scenarios to hide their vehicles, which is the most obvious thing you can do. How is every single person recognizing them? I work with the public and there's no chance I'd recognize either of them from a distance or if they were just passing through. They continually wasted time and money, which isn't something that people like them should be doing. They aren't portrayed as tweakers or people suffering from mental health issues where you'd expect them to make these boneheaded decisions, these are two bright and upstanding people in society who just forgot to do the most basic of things.

I could go on and on but I guess I'll stop there. There were some bright spots, I thought the actors did a nice job for the most part but just weren't given the right story to portray. The soundtrack was also pretty damn good.
 
1739977874577.png

Steel Magnolias (7/10) - Directed by Herbert Ross
I've heard about this movie in the general zeitgeist, but never really gave it much thought past being a 'chick flick'. Recently there were a few different Jeopardy clues about the film which I didn't get, of course, so I thought that was the Pop Culture and Film Gods telling me that it was time to watch it.

The film mainly follows the story of Shelby (Julia Roberts) as she tries to manage her desires to start a family against the dangers of her poor medical state, which doctors have advised her against having children. Shelby's mother M'Lynn (Sally Field) is very much against the idea of Shelby having children, and is vocal to this point.

Shelby and her husband Jackson (Dylan McDermott) decide to take their chances with Shelby's condition and have a child, a baby boy named Jackson Jr. Shelby and her mother are supported by their affluent family friends Truvy (Dolly Parton), Clairee (Olympia Dukakis), and "Ouiser" (Shirley MacLaine), as well as new-in-town Annelle (Daryl Hannah).

Throughout the film there's a sub-plot story of Annelle's spotty past and her borderline obsession with religion juxtaposed with the other ladies' lifestyle.

The movie is chock-full of many comedic moments intertwined with very heavy emotional highs and lows... Without giving away too much, things take a turn for the worse and I'll leave it at that.

Some excellent acting from a star-studded cast. I thought the film jumped way too quickly throughout the timeline and leaves quite a lot of information out along the way of the film. Some of the jokes and light-hearted moments fall pretty flat (particularly from Dolly).

Overall, great film, that could have been better. I get the sense that there's quite a lot that was cut from the film for brevity's sake. Not an earth-shattering film in any sense, but I feel a little more cultured having seen it.

Edit: Why do my reviews for the most random movies always seem to end up with so much rambling? lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: ItsFineImFine
01_SOUNDTRACK-TO-A-COUP-DETAT_Johan-Grimonprez_2023_ANDREE_BLOUIN.jpg


Soundtrack to a Coup d'Etat (2024) Directed by Johan Grimenprez 6B (documentary)

This Oscar-nominated two and a half hour documentary exposes how black American jazz musicians (Louis Armstrong, Dizzy Gilespie, Max Roach, et al) became part of a cultural exchange programme with Africa that was used to mask UN/US/Belgian/CIA/President Eisenhower's attempts to assassinate democratically elected Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba of the Congo. Why? Because he was leaning towards the Soviet Union, and the West wanted the rich mineral resources of his newly independent country. This interpretation is completely ass-backwards from how it was presented by NA media at the time. However, Soundtrack to a Coup d'Etat's bona fides are pretty damn impressive. The documentary uses archival footage and interviews with key surviving players to make its case. Over the years, I think I have just become cynical about these things. If this is true, it doesn't really surprise me. Superpowers are going to do what superpowers do, and one hopes one's own country can just get the hell out of the bloody way. Even that is looking like an insurmountable chore these days.
 
Shall We Dance? (1996) - 6/10

Man who doesn't like or care about dancing watches film with dancing then proceeds to review film. There's a Richard Gere American re-make, I watched the higher rated Japanese one which suffers a bit from some of the stereotypes of 80s/90s Japanese cinema.
 
Captain America Brave New World - 7/10

I have not watched the Falcon & Winter Soldier series, so some of the stuff was unfamiliar to me, but I thought it was an ok movie overall, Mackie was pretty good as Cap, his hacker sidekick Falcon buddy was a bit heavy on the comedy relief for my taste, but that seems to be the formula so it is what it is. Not the worst Marvel movie, but closer to the bottom than the top. Harrison Ford is a natural as the grouchy old guy, would have been nice to see Giancarlo Esposito used a bit more, he is a natural bad guy
 
Universal Language (dir. Matthew Rankin, 2024)

Matthew Rankin’s Universal Language is an oddity in the best way—a film that feels like a lost artifact from a timeline where Winnipeg is the cultural crossroads of the world and Quebec has seceded just to make life more absurd. With its fragmented narrative, deadpan humor, and playful surrealism, it carries the spirit of an offbeat travelogue through a country that only exists in the margins of reality.

The film’s structure is deceptively loose, weaving between disparate characters who all seem to be searching for something—lost money frozen in ice, a sense of belonging, or just a coherent tour guide in the ever-shifting Winnipeg landscape. Rankin’s background in experimental filmmaking is on full display, blending moments of documentary realism with hilariously stilted dialogue and dreamlike detours. The influence of Abbas Kiarostami looms large, not just in the Iranian elements, but in the way Rankin frames his characters against an environment that often feels both mundane and mythic.

At times, Universal Language leans a little too hard into its own absurdity, and its disconnected structure occasionally loses momentum. Some of the humor lands perfectly, while other moments feel like inside jokes waiting for an audience that may never arrive. But even when it meanders, the film’s off-kilter charm remains undeniable. It’s a film about people stuck between places—between languages, between cultures, between narratives that refuse to resolve cleanly.

Not everything here translates perfectly, but that’s kind of the point. Rankin has crafted something weirdly poetic—an ode to displacement, miscommunication, and the strange beauty of being lost in translation.


I agree with just about everything you say here. Universal Language is a clever movie, a homage to several directors including Kiarostami, Panahi, Kaurismaki, Andersson, and maybe the one too many for me, Wes Anderson. And it does have playful things to say about the vagaries of identity and place. The idea of a Winnipeg, indeed a Canada, transformed by Persian culture is a funny one. It also has some clever digs at the blandness of Canadian culture, all that beige architecture and those dull tourist attractions. Yet, I never really got emotionally involved in it, and I wonder whether the movie is going to be way too much a series of in-jokes for a general audience. I liked it, but for me it's a case of the whole being less than the sum of its parts. 6B.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pranzo Oltranzista
68747470733a2f2f696d6167652e746d64622e6f72672f742f702f6f726967696e616c2f6658514a78525979736d444b4d6a7a764f726b7970686b6c4167362e6a7067


Parthenope (2025) Directed by Paolo Sorrentino 4B

For Italian director Paolo Sorrentino (Il Divo; The Great Beauty) the more movies he makes, the worse he seems to get. Parthenope is an extremely vapid updating of the myth of the Greek siren who lured sailors to their death. Played by the beautiful Celeste Della Porta, the siren part is well taken care of. Though by mythical standards, she is pretty benign. Nothing worthy of note actually happens so the story is about as involving as watching a Christian Dior perfume commercial, sleekly gorgeous but devoid of interest. Parthenope is strictly a lovely object who the camera fawns over in a kind of '70s soft core porn way. Various men swim in and out of view but with the collective gravity of gold fish. I have no idea what Sorrentino saw in this project. Maybe he just had a crush on Della Porta and wanted to spend more time with her. Couldn't blame him for that, but this movie never should have seen the light of day.

subtitles
 
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) - 8/10

I watched this for the 20th time tonight (with my nephew for his 1st time) and don't usually review re-watches, but someone recently besmirched this film and I feel like defending it. Sure, it's not as great as 'Raiders' or 'Last Crusade' and, sure, it has some dodgy special effects, underwhelming villains and an annoying main character, but it's still a very entertaining film, especially in its action-packed final act, and it has its heart in the right place (if you know what I mean). This unashamedly nostalgic Gen-Xer really enjoyed it and felt like a kid again, so there.

Movies like Raiders, Temple of Doom, ET, Goonies, Empire Strikes Back, Back to the Future… the blockbusters of the 80s just hit harder back then.

If you didn’t live through those times, there is no real way to explain the experience and how life was back then.

The internet as we know it didn’t exist, Blockbusters/other movie rental places didn’t pop up where I lived until the late 80s, and many of us got like 4 TV channels.

My dad surprising us and taking us to see Empire Strikes Back was like Christmas morning.

1740319616050.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Osprey
Movies like Raiders, Temple of Doom, ET, Goonies, Empire Strikes Back, Back to the Future… the blockbusters of the 80s just hit harder back then.

If you didn’t live through those times, there is no real way to explain the experience and how life was back then.

The internet as we know it didn’t exist, Blockbusters/other movie rental places didn’t pop up where I lived until the late 80s, and many of us got like 4 TV channels.

My dad surprising us and taking us to see Empire Strikes Back was like Christmas morning.

View attachment 981407

And going to the movies was just more of a special thing back then, you didn't have the giant multi-plex theaters, and if your town was lucky enough to have a movie theater, it was one screen, and one movie. I freely admit that my daughter is spoiled, but going to the movies is almost a general way of life for us, we probably go twice a month, sometimes more. She probably went to the movies more in the last year than I did my entire childhood

But, I am also not going to complain, I like going to the movies and she does too, and one of these days she is going to wake up and be too cool to hang out with dad, so I'm going to take advantage of things while I still can
 
And going to the movies was just more of a special thing back then, you didn't have the giant multi-plex theaters, and if your town was lucky enough to have a movie theater, it was one screen, and one movie. I freely admit that my daughter is spoiled, but going to the movies is almost a general way of life for us, we probably go twice a month, sometimes more. She probably went to the movies more in the last year than I did my entire childhood

But, I am also not going to complain, I like going to the movies and she does too, and one of these days she is going to wake up and be too cool to hang out with dad, so I'm going to take advantage of things while I still can

Ya I took my daughter twice over the holidays and that’s about how much I went in an entire year if I was lucky.

She doesn’t get it and I understand that.

I don’t lecture her much about “back in my day” because she wouldn’t understand a life without YT, smart phones, giant TVs, streaming, and 500 channels.

Like you I just want to enjoy the time with my daughter. She’s 14 now and has her first bf, so my days of being the center of her universe are waning.

Ultimately though, have a lot of treasured memories from going to see those 80s blockbusters - I even saw ET at a Drive-In and it was cool AF.

My daughter would be like “what’s a drive-in.. oh sounds lame!”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Winger98 and kihei
Ya I took my daughter twice over the holidays and that’s about how much I went in an entire year if I was lucky.

She doesn’t get it and I understand that.

I don’t lecture her much about “back in my day” because she wouldn’t understand a life without YT, smart phones, giant TVs, streaming, and 500 channels.

Like you I just want to enjoy the time with my daughter. She’s 14 now and has her first bf, so my days of being the center of her universe are waning.

Ultimately though, have a lot of treasured memories from going to see those 80s blockbusters - I even saw ET at a Drive-In and it was cool AF.

My daughter would be like “what’s a drive-in.. oh sounds lame!”

All the modern conveniences we now have really does make the 80's feel like the dark ages in comparison

My daughter is almost 8 so she is a little further removed from the old days, and she is a good sport about the "old stuff" we went to the newest Indiana Jones movie last year, and she was kind enough to not crap on dad's nostalgia and, just say, "well it wasn't my favorite" instead of outright bashing it

Popcorn can usually forgive the sins of a dull movie for her
 
  • Like
Reactions: PK Cronin
Rio Bravo (dir. Howard Hawks, 1959)

There are Westerns, and then there's Rio Bravo. Howard Hawks strips the genre down to its essence—men, guns, a frontier town—but instead of building toward a grand shootout, he crafts something more deliberate, more textured. This isn't a film about action. It's about patience, camaraderie, and the quiet resilience of those who stand their ground.

John Wayne is at his most stoic as Sheriff John T. Chance, but the film's real soul is Dean Martin as Dude, a washed-up drunk clawing his way back to dignity. His arc is one of the most affecting in any Western, the bottle always a temptation but never an escape. Ricky Nelson’s Colorado brings youthful cool, while Walter Brennan’s cantankerous Stumpy steals scenes with every growl and gripe. And then there’s Angie Dickinson’s Feathers—sharp, playful, and fully capable of holding her own in a town full of stubborn men.

Hawks doesn’t rush. The stakes are clear, but the film luxuriates in its characters, letting them talk, joke, and form bonds that feel real. The tension builds not through grand chases or duels but through quiet moments, each one reinforcing the siege mentality that drives the story forward. By the time the bullets fly, we’re invested in more than just the outcome—we care about how these people survive.

If High Noon is about a man standing alone, Rio Bravo is about standing together. It’s a Western that values loyalty over heroics, endurance over spectacle. Hawks may have set out to make an anti-High Noon, but what he really made was one of the warmest, most rewatchable films in the genre. It’s tough, it’s tender, and it’s got a hell of a harmonica score. Classic.

 
All the modern conveniences we now have really does make the 80's feel like the dark ages in comparison

Yet back then it felt like we were on the cusp of this great technological revolution.

We had $1000 VCRs, cordless phones, Nintendo, Apple Mac, that cable TV stuff the rich kid in the neighborhood had…

And car phones! Imagine calling grandma or your friends from a car - that shit is crazy!

All that insane technology had my grandparents confused as hell and I was a whiz because I knew how to set a VCR clock.

My dad got this $800 VCR for like $300 at a warehouse sale because they marked it wrong - and we were the coolest kids in the neighborhood for awhile.

Everyone wanted to come over and marvel at our expensive ass VCR.

It’s all relative - one day my daughter will be telling her grandkids and their friends to get off her lawn to.
 
Last edited:
Tropic Thunder
Funny enough but from the first time I saw it up through rewatching it yesterday, I just cannot shake its fatal flaw. The most effective spoofs and satires work because it isn't hard to imagine the participants in the straight version of the story. That's key to the joke. Leslie Neilsen could be a serious cop. Charlie Sheen could be a hot shot pilot. Michael Jai White could be a kung-fu inner city ass kicker. The entire real cast of Galaxy Quest is a bad break or two from being the actual characters in Galaxy Quest.

Tropic Thunder gets two-thirds of its equation right. Robert Downey Jr. absolutely could be an overly committed capital-A actor. Jack Black totally could be a crass, juvenile comedy hack. But there is no planet where Ben Stiller can pull off being a credible action movie star. Everything with him is too exaggerated, too stupid and falls fully flat with me. The best bit concerning his character is the Simple Jack joke, but the funniest part of that is actually from RDJ's character who lectures him about his acting choices.

It's doubly frustrating to me because the better movie is sitting right there if Tom Cruise and Ben Stiller had just swapped parts. Now, I can fully concede Cruise would never play that role and maybe couldn't play that role. But Cruise as Tug Speedman, at least in theory, is a more pointed, maybe even funnier movie. I would have liked to see them try.

Cruise's performance got a lot of praise at the time. I chuckled then but it doesn't do much for me now. Equivalent of having a foul mouthed old person in a movie. It's all initial shock (Tom Cruise is "fat" and bald and said THAT!!) but nothing lasting.

The rest of the cast works pretty well though. I've found I laugh the hardest at some of the tertiary characters though ... Danny McBride, Nick Nolte and Matthew McConaghey in particular.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tasty Biscuits
All the modern conveniences we now have really does make the 80's feel like the dark ages in comparison

My daughter is almost 8 so she is a little further removed from the old days, and she is a good sport about the "old stuff" we went to the newest Indiana Jones movie last year, and she was kind enough to not crap on dad's nostalgia and, just say, "well it wasn't my favorite" instead of outright bashing it

Popcorn can usually forgive the sins of a dull movie for her

It's so funny you brought that movie up as I just watched it with my daughter, who is about a year younger than yours, just the other day. She actually loves the original trilogy and enjoyed the Crystal Skull enough but she really didn't enjoy the last one.

I think the runtime was too long and the object they were chasing was more confusing/less visually interesting than the movies that came before it. Also, it's just not that good no matter how you slice it.

I'm doing my best to introduce her to all of the older movies that I love so she can have an appreciation for them (The Goonies, E.T., Back to the Future, Star Wars, etc. and I've even snuck in some black and white films) and so far it's one pretty well. We're movie buddies and I couldn't be happier with that but I'm soaking it all up now because it won't last forever.
 
It's so funny you brought that movie up as I just watched it with my daughter, who is about a year younger than yours, just the other day. She actually loves the original trilogy and enjoyed the Crystal Skull enough but she really didn't enjoy the last one.

I think the runtime was too long and the object they were chasing was more confusing/less visually interesting than the movies that came before it. Also, it's just not that good no matter how you slice it.

I'm doing my best to introduce her to all of the older movies that I love so she can have an appreciation for them (The Goonies, E.T., Back to the Future, Star Wars, etc. and I've even snuck in some black and white films) and so far it's one pretty well. We're movie buddies and I couldn't be happier with that but I'm soaking it all up now because it won't last forever.

My daughter is extremely patient, we did the extended cuts of the original LOTR trilogy last year and she sat thru all thee including the 4+ hours of Return of the King and enjoyed it. Indy sadly was "Just a little boring" to her
 
My daughter is extremely patient, we did the extended cuts of the original LOTR trilogy last year and she sat thru all thee including the 4+ hours of Return of the King and enjoyed it. Indy sadly was "Just a little boring" to her

We did LOTR (not the extended cuts) a couple years ago and she was surprisingly very interested and not scared, and at no points was she bored. With her being so young when she watched it I do wonder if she'd still enjoy it now since I'm sure she doesn't really remember it all that well. Maybe I'll have to set that up for our next movie night. :laugh:
 
The most effective spoofs and satires work because it isn't hard to imagine the participants in the straight version of the story. That's key to the joke [. . . . ] Tropic Thunder gets two-thirds of its equation right. Robert Downey Jr. absolutely could be an overly committed capital-A actor. Jack Black totally could be a crass, juvenile comedy hack. But there is no planet where Ben Stiller can pull off being a credible action movie star.

This is a very astute and on point observation.

It's doubly frustrating to me because the better movie is sitting right there if Tom Cruise and Ben Stiller had just swapped parts. Now, I can fully concede Cruise would never play that role and maybe couldn't play that role.

Stiller was originally going to be in the McConaughey role and sent the script to Cruise for the Speedman role coincidentally. So their initial instincts were correct. Cue: Grantland!
We originally wanted Tom to play the lead — Tugg Speedman. Ben was going to play the agent.

Tom read the script when there was no Les Grossman and said, “I think you need another villain other than just the 12-year-old drug king. What about some greedy pig studio executive who really represents the gross part of Hollywood?”
 
Charade (dir. Stanley Donen, 1963)

“Do you know what’s wrong with you? Nothing.” Audrey Hepburn’s Reggie delivers this line to Cary Grant’s Peter, and honestly, it’s the perfect summation of Charade. This is a film where nothing feels wrong—just a delightful concoction of romance, suspense, and wit wrapped in Parisian glamour.

From the very start, Charade reels you in with its twisty premise: a young widow, a hidden fortune, a dead husband with multiple identities, and a parade of shady characters who may or may not be after her. Audrey Hepburn is at her most luminous, bringing charm, vulnerability, and just enough cunning to her role. Cary Grant, despite being decades older than Hepburn, matches her charisma with his suave, playful presence. Their chemistry is electric, crackling through sharp banter and teasing glances.

Director Stanley Donen strikes a masterful balance between Hitchcockian tension and screwball comedy. The suspense sequences—like the shadowy cat-and-mouse chases—are expertly crafted, but it’s the film’s sly humor that lingers. One moment you’re gripping the edge of your seat; the next, you’re grinning at Cary Grant awkwardly taking a shower fully clothed.

Of course, Henry Mancini’s jazzy score ties it all together. It’s as stylish and effervescent as the film itself, underscoring both the danger and the flirtation at play.

If there’s a flaw, it’s that Charade is so breezy in tone that the darker elements—murder, greed, betrayal—never quite land with the intended gravity. But honestly, who’s complaining when the ride is this fun?

Charade isn’t just the best “Hitchcock movie Hitchcock didn’t make”—it’s a timeless joyride where Paris sparkles, secrets unravel, and Hepburn and Grant show us what movie-star magic truly looks like.


One of my all time favorite films. I even bought the soundtrack.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad