Does "complexity" and different readings necessary confirm on a film "good movie" status, though? Don't get me wrong, I think you give a likely purrfect reading of between-the-lines Neon Demon, one that at my most catty I would not dispute. And I can see why one might want to bump a movie a point upwards because of clever use of symbolism, subtext, academic cleverness, and so on. But to me, even with your reading, Neon Demon is still a tedious, excessive, indulgent mess of a movie. So while the dimension you discuss is of interest, it does not significantly transform the value of the movie in my eyes. I have a feeling this sort of stuff goes on a lot with both directors who I actively dislike on the whole--Jadoworsky, Aronofsky, some Pasolini--and directors who I usually tolerate well--Von Trier, Malick, Bunuel. It would rarely if ever make or break a movie for me, though.