Movies: Last Movie You Watched and Rate it | {Insert Appropriate Seasonal Greeting Here}

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,144
Toronto
All of Us Strangers (2023) Directed by Andrew Haigh 5B

Adam (Andrew Scott) begins a relationship with Harry (Paul Mescal), seemingly the only other tenant in their London high-rise apartment building. Andrew has also taken to visiting his parents in the suburbs, an occurrence that seems to make both his parents (Jamie Bell and Clare Foy) and him happy. Only trouble is his parents have been dead for twelve years. What follows is a very atmospheric examination of loss, isolation and loneliness, one made even more effective by the ensemble acting which is excellent. In a darkly dreamy way, we watch Adam and Harry's relationship grow physically and emotionally deeper while at the same time we get more dribs and drabs of information about the mysterious parents. All this is mostly very sensitively done, and I found myself getting caught up in Adam's life. But then I thought "what is actually going on here?" and that broke the spell. Even if taken as just a metaphor for existence, the plot is grounded upon no reality that I can conceive of or even identify, and no rationale is ever provided to fill in the blanks. This is poor script construction masquerading as misty ambiguity. As well, it does not help that the longer All of Us Strangers continues, the more heart-tugging it gets.

As the screenwriter struggles to say bigger and bigger things, the movie crumbles under the weight of its arbitrary metaphysical assumptions--ultimately there is nothing to ground this story in fantasy or reality. It's just some guy riffing on ideas about loss and death, sometimes effectively, but increasingly not. Ultimately, to borrow Gertrude Stein's description of Oakland, California, "there is no there there." A big reveal near the end, one that seems crass and heavy-handed, only adds to the movie's growing woes, and the sense of whatever sure-handedness the film once possessed has long departed the premisise by this point. There is much I enjoyed about All of Us Strangers. But in the end the movie is little more than high-end schlock.
 
Last edited:

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,922
10,805
societysnow.jpg


Society of the Snow (2023) - 7/10

In 1972, a plane carrying a Uruguayan rugby team crashed in the Andes. In 1993, the film Alive was made about it. When I started watching this, I wondered why the story was being told again. By the end, I had my answer. The film keeps alive (no pun intended) the memory of the passengers and their extraordinary ordeal and is a reminder of the power of human determination. It's also a presumably more authentic telling of the story, being based on more recent and forthcoming interviews and with the filmmakers using only Uruguayan and Argentinian actors (not Ethan Hawke, like the Hollywood version). It's a non-sensationalized and respectful telling that handles the grim subject matter with probably as much tact as possible. The acting is very good from the cast of unknowns. I did, however, have trouble connecting with the characters and think that I would've found the film even more moving if I had gotten to know and differentiate them better. It's still fairly powerful, though, and is assisted by breathtaking cinematography, visceral action sequences and impressive sound design. It's technically very well made. Even though I knew how the story ends, the 2:15 run time never felt like it dragged. It's apparently the Spanish entry for Best International Feature Film at the Oscars this year and is well worth watching if you're up for a good survival story. Thanks to ecemleafs for making me aware of it.

It's on Netflix in Spanish with subtitles or in dubbed English.
 
Last edited:

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,144
Toronto
View attachment 798659

Society of the Snow (2023) - 7/10

In 1972, a plane carrying a Uruguayan rugby team crashed in the Andes. In 1993, the film Alive was made about it. When I started watching this, I wondered why the story was being told again. By the end, I had my answer. The film keeps alive (no pun intended) the memory of the passengers and their extraordinary ordeal and is a reminder of the power of human determination. It's also a presumably more authentic telling of the story, being based on more recent and honest interviews and with the filmmakers using only Uruguayan and Argentinian actors (not Ethan Hawke, like the Hollywood version). It's a non-sensationalized and respectful telling that handles the grim subject matter with probably as much tact as possible. The acting is very good from the cast of unknowns. I did, however, have trouble connecting with the characters and think that I would've found the film even more moving if I had learned more about them. It's still fairly powerful, though, and is assisted by breathtaking cinematography, visceral action sequences and impressive sound design. It's technically very well made. Even though I knew how the story ends, the 2:15 run time never felt like it dragged. It's apparently the Spanish entry for Best International Feature Film at the Oscars this year and is well worth watching if you're up for a good survival story. Thanks to ecemleafs for making me aware of it.

It's on Netflix in Spanish with subtitles and in dubbed English.
Saves me a review. I agree entirely with you. I, too, found the characters hard to differentiate, but, like you, I didn't consider it a deal breaker. Society of the Snow is a well paced and well made survival movie that makes great use of its majestic but harrowing snowy locations.. I remember Alive which in many ways was pretty similar, but got far less positive reviews. Society of the Snow is easily the better, more visually impressive movie, though.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,144
Toronto
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,144
Toronto
The Promised Land (2023) Directed by Nikolaj Arcel 8A

The Promised Land
is a historical melodrama, set in the 18th century, about Ludvig Kahlen (Mads Mikkelsen) who is a retired military officer on no means nor title who asks permission of the King to cultivate Jutland, a particularly barren part of Denmark that is considered virtually uninhabitable. In return Kahlen hopes to be granted land and a title. Along the way he must overcome royal chicanery, frightened workers, horrid conditions, and a young gypsy girl who keeps popping up everywhere. However, his biggest challenge is a local magistrate who considers torture good sport and is as cruel as they come. So, what we got here is an old-fashioned movie, but one that is done to near perfection. The role is, of course, right in Mads Mikkelsen's wheelhouse; think Valhalla Rising; A Royal Affair; Age if Uprising: The Legend of Michael Kohlhaas. The fact that Mikkelsen can do this sort of thing in his sleep shouldn't be used to belittle how very, very good he is at it. For my money, Mikkelsen is the best actor in the world right now and has been for some time. And it ain't even close. Anyway, if you want to kick back and watch an entertaining "old school" movie, The Promised Land won't disappoint on any level.

subtitles
 
Last edited:

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
To Live and Die in L.A. - 8/10

This almost felt like a Michael Mann film at points, in a good way, but was actually directed by William Friedkin of The French Connection and The Exorcist fame.

It is a neo-noir crime film that I felt was very good. Solid soundtrack from Wang Chung, good action scenes, and a plot that kept me interested. An early Willem Dafoe role has him as a counterfeiter with some secret service agents hot on his trail. The resolution of it all is a cherry on top of a very engaging pie.
I love this movie so much. Doesn't have the awards or acclaim or historic significance of The French Connection or The Exorcist, but it's my personal favorite among Friedkin's movies.

It's interesting to watch it in tandem with The French Connection, where the latter feels a little bit like a reckoning with/response to the former.
 

Erikfromfin

Registered User
May 18, 2013
4,410
1,782
Half way through The Requin (2022). absolute carbage film I don't know if can finish it. 2022 was bad year for shark movies The Reef: Stalked and Shark Bait were crap too.

2023 has atleast disaster artist Tommy Wiseau's Big Shark looking forward to that.
 
Last edited:

Puck

Ninja
Jun 10, 2003
10,772
421
Ottawa
Huge night for Oppenheimer and great night for Anatomy of a Fall. Got no argument with either of those results.
My top two for 2023 were Killers of the Flower Moon (KOTFM) and Oppenheimer. IMHO KOTFM edged out Oppenheimer by a slim hair but that is just me. However Oppenheimer did well at the box office and KOTFM was a relative bust (if pulling in 150+ million is bad, it is I suppose if the movie cost $200M). I guess people don't like paying to get depressed. People have also voted with their wallets and I guess after the Globes, Oppenheimer will be the front runner to beat now at the Oscars. I guess I will ink in Oppenheimer on my Oscar pool now. Disclaimer, I have not seen all the movies you have. I still have some of your top 10 on my queue. Looking forward to seeing them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan and kihei

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
My top two for 2023 were Killers of the Flower Moon (KOTFM) and Oppenheimer. IMHO KOTFM edged out Oppenheimer by a slim hair but that is just me. However Oppenheimer did well at the box office and KOTFM was a relative bust (if pulling in 150+ million is bad, it is I suppose if the movie cost $200M). I guess people don't like paying to get depressed. People have also voted with their wallets and I guess after the Globes, Oppenheimer will be the front runner to beat now at the Oscars. I guess I will ink in Oppenheimer on my Oscar pool now. Disclaimer, I have not seen all the movies you have. I still have some of your top 10 on my queue. Looking forward to seeing them.
Oppenheimer seems like it's going to be tough to beat. My guess is the biggest threat will be The Holdovers, which is the sort of throwback, feel good-y type of movie older voters historically have gravitated toward. But I don't think it'll ultimately have enough juice. To the front runner's credit there doesn't seem to be a noticeable ANTI-Oppenheimer push (or at least one yet). Half the formula for an Oscar upset is usually having a vocal opposition that isn't as much for another movie, but against that movie.

Killers of the Flower Moon ... too long.
Poor Things ... too weird.
Barbie ... too pink.

I feel like those five are the top contenders.
 

Puck

Ninja
Jun 10, 2003
10,772
421
Ottawa
Oppenheimer seems like it's going to be tough to beat. My guess is the biggest threat will be The Holdovers, which is the sort of throwback, feel good-y type of movie older voters historically have gravitated toward. But I don't think it'll ultimately have enough juice. To the front runner's credit there doesn't seem to be a noticeable ANTI-Oppenheimer push (or at least one yet). Half the formula for an Oscar upset is usually having a vocal opposition that isn't as much for another movie, but against that movie.

Killers of the Flower Moon ... too long.
Poor Things ... too weird.
Barbie ... too pink.

I feel like those five are the top contenders.
I haven't seen Poor Things yet but 'too weird' has never been a negative for me. 'Too long' this year should not be too much of a negative, a lot of them are 'too long' IMHO. But I did notice that my personal front runner for 2017 Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri, lost a lot of steam in the final stretch with some negative press about putting America in a bad light. That might also be a problem for Killers OTFM as well as being somewhat depressing. But bad PR, depressing and too long isn't a factor for me either. I still can't believe The Fish won it that year (Shape of Water).

Barbie I think is in a downward spiral at this point, but it does win the Box Office consolation prize for Warner Bros and filling up their bank account with lots of cash. They won't complain. But an Oscar pool is serious business, so I think I will replace KOTFM for Oppie. (I liked both so no problem)
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
49,081
30,020
Le Samourai (1967) - I heard this mentioned a lot when The Killer was getting ready to come out so I gave it a shot. I.... didn't love it. On one hand it does a lot well - it's moody, pretty well shot, and the main character looks intimidating. On the other... I didn't like the pacing, there were a lot of shots that were 100% "of the time" and didn't age well for me (some shots directly into the camera, close ups of the gun firing, etc.). Also - and I think this is where the Killer comparisons come in - the assassin was witnessed by an entire club full of people and only got away due to sheer luck. I wasn't impressed with him as a hit man, I didn't find the investigation portion particularly interesting, and it's a movie that I just think has not aged well. 3.5/10
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
49,081
30,020
So I watched Fargo as a palate cleanser.

Probably my 5th viewing or so? First in a couple of years. Confession: Coens are my favorite Directors.

This is a perfect film. Excellent shots of the setting to really put you in the Upper Midwest. Some A+ performances - McDormand most notably, but Macy as well and Lynch gives one of my favorite 3 scene performances as the doting husband. Buscemi is great as always, and it's like everyone that's given one or two scenes just puts everything into it.

10/10 - one of my absolute favorites.
 

JetsWillFly4Ever

Registered User
May 21, 2011
6,382
9,587
Winnipeg MB.
Saltburn - 6.5/10
An entertaining movie with standout performances from Keoghan and Elordi. Beautifully shot. Thought some of the 'scenes' were there mostly for shock value and didn't necessarily add to the movie for me personally. Digging deeper into it was interesting learning about the class differences in the UK as it seemed like Keoghan's character was still very well-off despite presenting himself as poor.

Anatomy of a Fall - 6/10
Really thought I would like this more, not even sure why it didn't land with me. Maybe because the French court scenes just seem so bizarre, even though I have read that is pretty close to what it is really like. Would have liked to see more about the relationship between Samuel and Sandra. I think it would have made me more invested in the outcome of the case as well as the scene where the big argument between them occurs.

I will say I thought the child actor was fantastic. I found myself seeing the case through his lens and the scene near the end where he and Marge talk about making a choice to believe something was very poignant.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
Oppenheimer seems like an absolute lock to me to win the Best Picture Award. I don't think there will be another nominated movie out there that can sneak up on it.

Shaping up to be a bland awards year for me. Not just the lack of drama, but also from the major contenders I've seen I pretty much like them all. I'm not passionately pro or con for any. Good problem to have in the scheme of things. Maestro's the only one that I have major issues with but it's pretty clearly going to be a bridesmaid for the most part. (Mulligan may win and I suppose a Cooper upset isn't crazy but it's not going to win director or picture despite the Academy's historic love of actors who direct).

Killers of the Flower Moon would be my personal pick but I don't have major quibbles with the other options. I don't love the Emily Blunt character in Oppenheimer (a fine performance of a ridiculous one-note character any decent actress could pull off), but it doesn't look like she's going to win. And even if she did, I like her work in general so good for her. They do love giving Oscars to lesser performances from good actors/actresses so there's plenty of precedent.

Just saw Poor Things. Wild that this and Barbie came out the same year — both tales of sheltered, simple young women who venture out in the world, both with outwardly cool, but actually thin-skinned, needy men in tow, who see the inequities and cruelties of the outside world and use it to learn who they truly are. Both incredibly funny as well.

There's a lot I loved about Poor Things. I see all the gorgeous, gaudy set dec and production design and I can't help but think what Terry Gilliam thinks of it (though he probably wouldn't care for the themes). A really brilliant script for a couple of reasons. At its heart, it's almost a series of lectures. Lessons for its lead (and for us). It's not subtle about this, but it's so humorously executed I never bumped on any of it even as it was obvious that was happening. The second is the Bella character. She's ... let's say simple. She's a child in a woman's body. It's a clever set up both for the movie that follows and it gives Emma Stone a lot to do. The sorta faux-fairy tale setting lets Stone and movie get away with a lot of schtick that wouldn't fly in a more contemporary or grounded movie.

And god bless Mark Ruffalo. His devolution from suave, strutting stud muffin to wounded and whiny puddle had me rolling. His line delivery on many words I probably shouldn't type here, just chef's kiss stuff. Second best such performance I saw this year behind, you guessed it, Ryan Gosling in Barbie.
 
Last edited:

ItsFineImFine

Registered User
Aug 11, 2019
3,745
2,389
Saltburn (2023) - 4/10

I hate the A24'ification of film (I realize this is not an A24 film but tries to copy that style). A bad thin story covered by gloss. Good cinematography but reliant on trying to be subtle and using an unreliable narrator while forcing abstract tension in every scene unnecessarily.

Inside Man (2006) - 7.5/10

Really solid Denzel film but falls short of being great because the final 20-30 minutes are really poor compared to the rest of the film. Could have been one of the more satisfying heist films but the rest is sharp 00's laced high-stakes action-drama which I sorely miss.

Time Without Pity (1957) - 7/10

Solid Joseph Losey British drama. A whodunnit in a way where they reveal the killer in the opening scene and the father tries to prove his son is innocent surrounded by the kitchen sink bleakness of the era. Maybe not the most well-acted at times compared to some of his other films but neatly done either way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,144
Toronto
Shaping up to be a bland awards year for me. Not just the lack of drama, but also from the major contenders I've seen I pretty much like them all. I'm not passionately pro or con for any. Good problem to have in the scheme of things. Maestro's the only one that I have major issues with but it's pretty clearly going to be a bridesmaid for the most part. (Mulligan may win and I suppose a Cooper upset isn't crazy but it's not going to win director or picture despite the Academy's historic love of actors who direct).

Killers of the Flower Moon would be my personal pick but I don't have major quibbles with the other options. I don't love the Emily Blunt character in Oppenheimer (a fine performance of a ridiculous one-note character any decent actress could pull off), but it doesn't look like she's going to win. And even if she did, I like her work in general so good for her. They do love giving Oscars to lesser performances from good actors/actresses so there's plenty of precedent.

Just saw Poor Things. Wild that this and Barbie came out the same year — both tales of sheltered, simple young women who venture out in the world, both with outwardly cool, but actually thin-skinned, needy men in tow, who see the inequities and cruelties of the outside world and use it to learn who they truly are. Both incredibly funny as well.

There's a lot I loved about Poor Things. I see all the gorgeous, gaudy set dec and production design and I can't help but think what Terry Gilliam thinks of it (though he probably wouldn't care for the themes). A really brilliant script for a couple of reasons. At its heart, it's almost a series of lectures. Lessons for its lead (and for us). It's not subtle about this, but it's so humorously executed I never bumped on any of it even as it was obvious that was happening. The second is the Bella character. She's ... let's say simple. She's a child in a woman's body. It's a clever set up both for the movie that follows and it gives Emma Stone a lot to do. The sorta faux-fairy tale setting lets Stone and movie get away with a lot of schtick that wouldn't fly in a more contemporary or grounded movie.

And god bless Mark Ruffalo. His devolution from suave, strutting stud muffin to wounded and whiny puddle had me rolling. His line delivery on many words I probably shouldn't type here, just chef's kiss stuff. Second best such performance I saw this year behind, you guessed it, Ryan Gosling in Barbie.
My big issue is Lily Gladstone. She is certainly very good but it is so obviously a supporting role that I am amazed the Academy didn't recognize that fact. And it is a very subdued performance, nowhere near as technically demanding as the roles Huller (my pick) Stone and Mulligan tackled. On a personal level, I would be happy for Gladstone if she won as I like her, but I really believe that there are better choices, multiple ones.
 
Last edited:

Puck

Ninja
Jun 10, 2003
10,772
421
Ottawa
Also color me surprised that Lily Gladstone won but the Globes win does make her one of the favorites to watch for now. Not a demanding role for a stoic character but the Globes need to rectify years of bad rep and the Gladstone win does help in that regard I suppose. I really don't know Gladstone the actress, but I really loved the character she played in the movie.
 

Puck

Ninja
Jun 10, 2003
10,772
421
Ottawa

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
Screen actors guild (SAG) nominations were just announced. it's déja vu with almost the same list as the Golden Globes. One notable change, Leonardo DiCaprio gets shunned in Best Actor category.


SAG struggling with names that start with E for some reason ...

"MMA STONE"
"BON MOSS-BACHRACH"
 
  • Haha
Reactions: OzzyFan

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
49,081
30,020
Tonight I watched Barry Lyndon.

First, the obvious. What an absurdly beautiful film. Every set is just gorgeous, obviously the candles give an amazing effect, and... I mean what else is there to say. It's the standard all other films are measured against for a reason.

Regarding the rest. It's an incredibly slow film that somehow avoids feeling like it. Barry is one of the classic scoundrels. Deliberate pacing, but definitely not for everyone. Well performed but there is a lot of the movie that's told a bit more than shown. I love it, but it's a bit short of perfection for me. That being said the end makes me cry every time with his son. Probably like 4th or 5th on my Kubrick ranking.

9/10
 
Last edited:

ItsFineImFine

Registered User
Aug 11, 2019
3,745
2,389
(Haru) (1996) - 7/10

This is an essential early-internet era movie for film fans today imo just because of the plot: Two young individuals meet online on a film forum and become interested in each other after e-mailing everyday. Set in Japan, a good chunk of the film shows them e-mailing back and forth so you'll be reading subtitles translating a text block for a large portion of the film but it's still worth the scenes in-between and just the general early online interaction which really isn't shown much in film.

Fair play to the Japanese, they were making this while Hollywood was doing Sandra Bullock's 'The Net'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan and Zeppo

2CHAINZ

Registered User
Feb 27, 2008
14,965
21,064
So I recently sat down and watched some movies I had never bothered with until recently.

The Hurt Locker 6/10

I don't get how it won an Oscar; I found it very meh

Zero Dark Thirty 8/10

I really enjoyed this one

Lone Survivor 7/10

I really enjoyed the pacing and action until the last 1/4 of the movie, where Mark ended up in the village. The first 3/4 of the film was great; I thought it dropped the ball at the end there

13 hours, 7/10

Nothing special I liked the action even though I thought the bad guys were really dumb, just running up and dying with no strategy. I am not sure if that's how the events actually went down, but these dudes just mowed down like 100 bad guys.

Fargo (That's right, I never watched it till now) 9/10

f***ing amazing movie can't believe I never watched it till now lol.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad