Player Discussion Lane Hutson Part 2

KevSkillz4

Registered User
Apr 11, 2016
8,262
13,952
I'd like to think he's our real 1OA from 2022, and Slafkovsky we got later in the draft lol.

I would be very happy if the draft have been that:

#1 - Lane Hutson.
#26 - Juraj Slafkovsky.
#33 - Owen Beck.
#62 - Adam Engstron.

The rest.

That's insane haha!

I'm very confident that Slaf and Hutson are going to be both in top 5 when a re-draft in few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthew McConaughay

Matthew McConaughay

Registered User
May 3, 2013
3,128
4,381
I would be very happy if the draft have been that:

#1 - Lane Hutson.
#26 - Juraj Slafkovsky.
#33 - Owen Beck.
#62 - Adam Engstron.

The rest.

That's insane haha!

I'm very confident that Slaf and Hutson are going to be both in top 5 when a re-draft in few years.
From what i have seen so far from Hutson, and if he keeps playing like this and gets better, in the coming years, he's the best player in this draft.
 
Last edited:

Catanddogguitarrr

Registered User
Jul 3, 2016
8,410
6,436
Nowhere land
It's too bad in his earring he doesn't have his father. He have Kovasevik but Geoff Molson is trying to have one of Markov, Weber or Subban to tell him what to do. It's not easy to manage the first teleguided player of the nhl.
 

Bobby Holik agent

erudite free agency sci-fi
Oct 17, 2002
338
428
Montreal
vs Benson.jpg
 

Jurivan Demidovsky

Registered User
Nov 26, 2024
212
364
I would be very happy if the draft have been that:

#1 - Lane Hutson.
#26 - Juraj Slafkovsky.
#33 - Owen Beck.
#62 - Adam Engstron.

The rest.

That's insane haha!

I'm very confident that Slaf and Hutson are going to be both in top 5 when a re-draft in few years.
Slafkovsky at #26 is not possible, if you pick Hutson at #1 you lose Slafkovsky because hes already taken in the top 3. At 26 you can get Kulich if you want..
 

417

Sheeeeeeeeeeeit!!!!!
Feb 20, 2003
52,565
30,631
Ottawa
I would be very happy if the draft have been that:

#1 - Lane Hutson.
#26 - Juraj Slafkovsky.
#33 - Owen Beck.
#62 - Adam Engstron.

The rest.

That's insane haha!

I'm very confident that Slaf and Hutson are going to be both in top 5 when a re-draft in few years.
Not trying to be an ass but honest question.

Why does it matter anymore? They drafted all of those players, if you're happy with them all, what difference does it make where they were drafted?
 

dackelljuneaubulis02

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
12,031
7,733
I would be very happy if the draft have been that:

#1 - Lane Hutson.
#26 - Juraj Slafkovsky.
#33 - Owen Beck.
#62 - Adam Engstron.

The rest.

That's insane haha!

I'm very confident that Slaf and Hutson are going to be both in top 5 when a re-draft in few years.
Still have Davidson too. Mesar isn't a lost cause yet and is still uber skilled.

Absolutely crazy draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EveryDay

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,679
71,821
Might be nitpicking, but there were many times where he could have had a legit grade A scoring chance on the PP but he opted to turn around which took him out of the dangerous position. Of course when he can pass it to Laine that's fine, but I'd still like to see him be more confident and rip it from that slot in the first place. It will catapult his offensive game as it's not the first time this happened too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs7631

Matthew McConaughay

Registered User
May 3, 2013
3,128
4,381
Might be nitpicking, but there were many times where he could have had a legit grade A scoring chance on the PP but he opted to turn around which took him out of the dangerous position. Of course when he can pass it to Laine that's fine, but I'd still like to see him be more confident and rip it from that slot in the first place. It will catapult his offensive game as it's not the first time this happened too.
He's young, he will evolve his game with time.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad