Player Discussion Lane Hutson Part 2

[windycity]

Shot had some jam on it, nice!

 

[Grate n Colorful Oz]

Ouf, people on the main board are too much.

"Rich man's Torey Krug/Tony Deangelo"

The saltiness, the cope. Just petty & envy.

 

[cphabs]

Wait this kid reaches 24 years old...

 

[Tyson]

Wait this kid reaches 24 years old...

He will emerge as the best player of the 22 draft

 

[Jurivan Demidovsky]

He will emerge as the best player of the 22 draft

Already is.

 

[the valiant effort]

Tbf, a rich man’s Torey Krug is a bona fide top ten dman

 

[CanadienShark]

I would protect Filip Mesar over both!

Scherbak here.

 

[CanadienShark]

Plus, his endocronologist says he will continue to grow until he is 35!

At 6'8" and 260 lbs as a 30-yr-old, Hutson will kill the league in his 3rd NHL contract!

I can't wait to see Hutson vs Chara 2.0

 

[CanadienShark]

There's no way CC shouldn't be on PP1. He's one of the league's leading goal leaders.

Only argument is size, but that group is far too talented for that to matter. I'd love it if Slafkovsky earned that spot.

 

[Lafleurs Guy]

Only argument is size, but that group is far too talented for that to matter. I'd love it if Slafkovsky earned that spot.

Well, it’s a nice problem to have.

You’re starting to see where we’re going here. If we start debating whether or not CC should be on first line PP, then we’re in good shape.

 

[JianYang]

The thread was started on the main board by a ranger fan followed by a bunch of haters making consistently snarky comments like he the next Bobby Orr hurr durr

Then they blame Habs fans for those kinds of comments because he was hyped up too much..... but check out page 1 of that thread and see which camp actually incited the silliness.

It's pretty clear there is a particular crowd that is unhappy about where lane ended up and how he is looking.

 

[Lafleurs Guy]

The thread was started on the main board by a ranger fan followed by a bunch of haters making consistently snarky comments like he the next Bobby Orr hurr durr

Then they blame Habs fans for those kinds of comments because he was hyped up too much..... but check out page 1 of that thread and see which camp actually incited the silliness.

It's pretty clear there is a particular crowd that is unhappy about where lane ended up and how he is looking.

They hate us cause they ain’t us.

Honestly I enjoy reading the thread. Guy is killing it.

 

[JianYang]

They hate us cause they ain’t us.

Honestly I enjoy reading the thread. Guy is killing it.

Its strange.

I mean, the Habs suck and they are low hanging fruit to make fun of. They should enjoy that.... but it's not enough for some people. Instead, they have to pull some mental gymnastics to downplay lane too.

It's the kind of takes that make you think pit of hate is bottomless and it's never enough.

 

[Lafleurs Guy]

Its strange.

I mean, the Habs suck and they are low hanging fruit to make fun of. They should enjoy that.... but it's not enough for some people. Instead, they have to pull some mental gymnastics to downplay lane too.

It's the kind of takes that make you think pit of hate is bottomless and it's never enough.

I think it’s great. Love those kinds of threads.

“But he’s -11!” Whatever. That’s how it was with Karlsson too. Don’t feed the trolls.

 

[KevSkillz4]

Hutson will always make everyone better.

His IQ is something else, at offense and defensive aswell.

I'm soo hype with him in the future with Demidov, Hage and more !

 

[JianYang]

I think it’s great. Love those kinds of threads.

“But he’s -11!” Whatever. That’s how it was with Karlsson too. Don’t feed the trolls.

Full disclosure, I wasn't the biggest Karlsson fan but I wasn't trying to paint him as a liability either.

The lane hate is definitely going there.

 

[HabzSauce]

Full disclosure, I wasn't the biggest Karlsson fan but I wasn't trying to paint him as a liability either.

The lane hate is definitely is going there.

You know what they say don't wrestle with pigs.

Sometimes so hard to resist tho

 

[CanadienShark]

Well, it’s a nice problem to have.

You’re starting to see where we’re going here. If we start debating whether or not CC should be on first line PP, then we’re in good shape.

Agreed all around here.