Value of: Landeskog to Ottawa

[Sens Vader]

Not sure if Colorado would be willing to trade core pieces this year, but what would it take to move Landeskog?

Click to read more...

 

[IWantSakicAsMyGM]

What would convince the Avs to move their captain and only top 6 winger? Significant overpayment.

 

[finds71]

Stone and 1st

 

[WhatTheDuck]

Stone and 1st

If there's a difference in value between the two it's a lot less than a 1st round pick.

If you're trying to say it would take an overpayment, it's probably better to just say that without actually posting an example.

 

[Avs44]

Stone and 1st

I'd do it straight up, though it seems pretty much pointless for both clubs to be honest. Not a good fit here for either team...the Avs need another top six winger, they can't trade their only good one.

 

[Benjamin]

If the Sens are trading a lot of value for a quality forward, I wouldn't want it to be Landeskog.

 

[edguy]

Love Landy. But he's not what we need.

 

[Sens Vader]

Love Landy. But he's not what we need.

What? Lol

 

[ReginKarlssonLehner]

What? Lol

He's kinda right. If we gonna put up a huge package, we need it to be for a purely skilled forward who can score and set up. Landeskog is the next best thing tho.

 

[lanceuppercut75]

As a neutral fan I'd love to see a Bobby Ryan (plus?) for Landeskog deal happen just to see HFBoards explode. Avs fans have been saying Landeskog is more valuable than JVR and Pacioretty. Not saying they're wrong. But to see fans with that mentality react to Ryan plus actually happening...

I'm a bad person and I should feel bad.

 

[Neiler]

I'd swap Hoffman the sniper for Landeskog the all around player any day. I'd rather have the guy who is above average at everything rather than the one who is amazing at one thing. Hoffman with Duchene or MacKinnon could be really interesting for the Avs.

Landeskog would have been interesting with Zibanejad, but I'm not sure how I feel about him with Turris or Brassard. Would have loved to have seen a Landeskog-Zibanejad-Stone line.

 

[edguy]

He's kinda right. If we gonna put up a huge package, we need it to be for a purely skilled forward who can score and set up. Landeskog is the next best thing tho.

This is what I was getting at.
If we are gonna trow major assets at Colorado, it should be for Matt Duchene or Nate MacKinnon (Maybe Mac I haven't watched him a ton recently so i dont know if he fits the bill)

 

[tucker3434]

As a neutral fan I'd love to see a Bobby Ryan (plus?) for Landeskog deal happen just to see HFBoards explode. Avs fans have been saying Landeskog is more valuable than JVR and Pacioretty. Not saying they're wrong. But to see fans with that mentality react to Ryan plus actually happening...

I'm a bad person and I should feel bad.

Yeah, and I'd like to see Matthews traded for McLeod. Looks like we'll both be disappointed.

 

[Cousin Eddie]

As a neutral fan I'd love to see a Bobby Ryan (plus?) for Landeskog deal happen just to see HFBoards explode. Avs fans have been saying Landeskog is more valuable than JVR and Pacioretty. Not saying they're wrong. But to see fans with that mentality react to Ryan plus actually happening...

I'm a bad person and I should feel bad.

What do you mean "That mentality?"

So you want to see a bad trade happen because fans are right about how they value a certain player? Wouldn't it be easier to just say you dislike the Avalanche?

Landeskog is more valuable than JVR and Pacioretty. Avs fans don't say it because they have a poor mentality. They say it because it's true. They also get frustrated with fans of every other team making threads about trading for their captain who happens to be the only top 6 winger the team has which is their biggest position of need.

 

[Upgrayedd]

Would love Landeskog but would cost much more than we have to give up for trade and rightfully so....don't imagine many Avs fans would be high on moving him at all.

If we are asking then it would likely take a Stone or Hoffman and a 1stish

 

[Lonewolfe2015]

I'm a bad person and I should feel bad.

Well, at least you admit you just want to watch the world burn. Kudos for the honesty.

To the OP, Ottawa is a bad* fit for a Landy trade in my opinion.

 

[topshelf15]

Would love Landeskog but would cost much more than we have to give up for trade and rightfully so....don't imagine many Avs fans would be high on moving him at all.

If we are asking then it would likely take a Stone or Hoffman and a 1stish

Pretty much this ,any move to get him would be lateral.As we would have to give up some decent chunk of our prospect and good nhl youth to get him

 

[Sureves]

Ottawa needs elite scoring. Landeskog is a fine player, but he's not a point producer.

 

[IWantSakicAsMyGM]

Ottawa needs elite scoring. Landeskog is a fine player, but he's not a point producer.

Apparently being the 11th highest scoring LW over the last 2 seasons doesn't qualify you as a "point producer".

 

[Benjamin]

Apparently being the 11th highest scoring LW over the last 2 seasons doesn't qualify you as a "point producer".

Sens already have enough 20-25 goal, 50-60 point forwards. We need a 65+ point forward.

 

[AvsGuy]

Sens already have enough 20-25 goal, 50-60 point forwards. We need a 65+ point forward.

LW Gabriel Landeskog
RW Blake Comeau



LW Mike Hoffman
D Cody Ceci
2nd round pick in 2017

 

[NickLidstrom]

Apparently being the 11th highest scoring LW over the last 2 seasons doesn't qualify you as a "point producer".

He isn't saying that Landeskog is a bad player. He's saying if we are giving up significant assets, we would rather target a star player, someone that can drive the offense. Landeskog is a 55-60 point player, we would be looking for a player in the 70 point range.

 

[KevinRedkey]

Apparently being the 11th highest scoring LW over the last 2 seasons doesn't qualify you as a "point producer".

16th in points per game in that span (I took out Vessey and Rodrigues). That means he's very average for a 1st line LW. That said.. Nick Foligno is 12th, so IDK if this is such a great stat to look at. Landeskog is clearly way better than Foligno. Either way, the point he was trying to make is we need more more dynamic offensive players. Think Taylor Hall or Claude Giroux. It's unlikely we land someone like that, but if we don't it's unlikely that we make a big splash of any kind.

 

[Benjamin]

LW Gabriel Landeskog
RW Blake Comeau



LW Mike Hoffman
D Cody Ceci
2nd round pick in 2017

 

[IWantSakicAsMyGM]

He isn't saying that Landeskog is a bad player. He's saying if we are giving up significant assets, we would rather target a star player, someone that can drive the offense. Landeskog is a 55-60 point player, we would be looking for a player in the 70 point range.

18 players in the league scored 70+ pts last year. 13 players have averaged 70+ pts over the last two years. Good luck getting one of those guys, without completely gutting your team. I wish you luck.