Sens Vader
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2016
- 7,496
- 5,334
Not sure if Colorado would be willing to trade core pieces this year, but what would it take to move Landeskog?
Stone and 1st
Stone and 1st
What? Lol
He's kinda right. If we gonna put up a huge package, we need it to be for a purely skilled forward who can score and set up. Landeskog is the next best thing tho.
As a neutral fan I'd love to see a Bobby Ryan (plus?) for Landeskog deal happen just to see HFBoards explode. Avs fans have been saying Landeskog is more valuable than JVR and Pacioretty. Not saying they're wrong. But to see fans with that mentality react to Ryan plus actually happening...
I'm a bad person and I should feel bad.
As a neutral fan I'd love to see a Bobby Ryan (plus?) for Landeskog deal happen just to see HFBoards explode. Avs fans have been saying Landeskog is more valuable than JVR and Pacioretty. Not saying they're wrong. But to see fans with that mentality react to Ryan plus actually happening...
I'm a bad person and I should feel bad.
I'm a bad person and I should feel bad.
Pretty much this ,any move to get him would be lateral.As we would have to give up some decent chunk of our prospect and good nhl youth to get himWould love Landeskog but would cost much more than we have to give up for trade and rightfully so....don't imagine many Avs fans would be high on moving him at all.
If we are asking then it would likely take a Stone or Hoffman and a 1stish
Ottawa needs elite scoring. Landeskog is a fine player, but he's not a point producer.
Apparently being the 11th highest scoring LW over the last 2 seasons doesn't qualify you as a "point producer".
Sens already have enough 20-25 goal, 50-60 point forwards. We need a 65+ point forward.
Apparently being the 11th highest scoring LW over the last 2 seasons doesn't qualify you as a "point producer".
Apparently being the 11th highest scoring LW over the last 2 seasons doesn't qualify you as a "point producer".
LW Gabriel Landeskog
RW Blake Comeau
LW Mike Hoffman
D Cody Ceci
2nd round pick in 2017
He isn't saying that Landeskog is a bad player. He's saying if we are giving up significant assets, we would rather target a star player, someone that can drive the offense. Landeskog is a 55-60 point player, we would be looking for a player in the 70 point range.