Value of: Landeskog to NYI
- Thread starter JZCislesHockey
- Start date
So basically we won't trade the players that might actually make this trade work. Good luck. lol
Foppa
Future Norris Winner
He would be a good fit for them...
High picks and prospects. *if* they are trading him, I assume it's cap related. Still going to take a huge overpayment. I assume
High picks and prospects. *if* they are trading him, I assume it's cap related. Still going to take a huge overpayment. I assume
Makar Goes Fast
grocery stick
JZCislesHockey
Registered User
There'd be no interest in Dal Colle, Bellows, Beauvillier, Ho-Sang, Pelech or Mayfield?
Avs44
Registered User
- May 16, 2011
- 21,889
- 10,678
Why are the Avs trading Landeskog for a quantity package? They need a top defensman. Really simple.
Super Cake
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2013
- 31,155
- 6,613
I would trade Barzal for Landeskog in a instant.
Barzal hasn't done jack **** in the NHL while Landeskog is a 23 year old proven top 6 player.
Avs wouldn't though. They need defense more than anything.
Barzal hasn't done jack **** in the NHL while Landeskog is a 23 year old proven top 6 player.
Avs wouldn't though. They need defense more than anything.
SI90
Registered User
None that would fetch him.... it's going to take a solid roster player plus a prospect to start.
SLAPSHOT723
QU! Bobcats!
Well with the high possibility we sign Ladd tomorrow I don't really see a fit. I'd rather get a RW. Although I do love Landeskog.
Avsblitzkrieg
Registered User
Only landy gets traded is a overpayment. We have no reason to. Put up or shut up as the saying goes
The Kingslayer
Registered User
Avs44
Registered User
- May 16, 2011
- 21,889
- 10,678
AvsGuy
Hired the wrong DJ again
Sidney the Kidney
One last time
- Jun 29, 2009
- 56,798
- 49,270
Would *you* trade one of your best players for a bunch of prospects and/or leftovers that the other team doesn't give a damn about parting with?
The problem with a lot of trade proposals on this forum is that fans never include players who they'd be hesitant to get rid of. A trade likely has proper value if you look at it before submitting the post and think, "Man, you know what ... I don't think I want to part with this guy". If you can make a trade proposal and hit submit without buyer's remorse, chances are it's not a fair return.
Want Landeskog? Can't have both Pulock and Hamonic as "untouchable". Can't keep a guy like Barzal off the block. You'd have to be willing to trade someone who you'd really rather not trade, otherwise, why is Colorado making the deal again?
SI90
Registered User
See Hall for Larsson.
Landeskog is an all around beast and consistent 20+ goal scorer. He's not a 30+ or 40 goal scorer.
We're not adding a 25 goal scorer to a #2 defenseman for Lando.
I love Lando but the isles aren't a good fit trade wise. Leddy and Hamonic are the 2 that COL would want but the isles are giving up either.
People need to learn how much top4 defenseman are valued in this league.
SI90
Registered User
Lando for Lidnholm
That's something I think the AVS are more or less looking for. Not picks and prospects.
That's something I think the AVS are more or less looking for. Not picks and prospects.
GirardSpinorama
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2004
- 21,824
- 10,818
SI90
Registered User
John Eichel da GOAT
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2008
- 6,486
- 2,097
PWJunior
Stay safe!
There's no way Landeskog should be available. The Isles don't have the surplus on defense to be able to get him anyway.
this would work for the Avs. they get an
Calvin de Haan NHLer
Kevin Czuczman a young farm dman
and next year's 2nd 2017
