If there's anyone Bergevin reminds me of a bit, it's Garth Snow. Moments of brilliance (the Weber trade, which I incorrectly thought was awful at the time, trading Pacioretty for Suzuki, drafting Caufield), and moments of just ... what? (Dvorak acquisition, drafting Mailloux).
It's difficult to know just how much had to do with being Quebecois for the Francophone jewel. That's just something that comes with the territory. Arguably, if we're keeping it totally about hockey personnel, the acquisition of Suzuki probably swings the whole record in a positive direction. (I have never been a huge fan of Sergachev.)
But Mailloux drafting really bugs me. Hiring Bergevin is kind of like going out and getting Quenneville to be your coach - it's a vote for the worst of the boys club see no evil sports culture.
(and ftr, sure, maybe Mailloux can get a 'second chance'. and Mailloux "renounced" himself from the draft. by drafting him, bergevin made that statement by Mailloux purely performative. did he react angrily to being drafted? no. he said it would make him a better person. whatever. my opinion fwiw is that it was performative, and Bergevin contributed to that. that's not the way adults are supposed to act.)