Ducks Nation*
Registered User
- Mar 19, 2013
- 16,329
- 4
By the way, Aho (Fin) has had two secondary assists taken away from him, so his point total should already be 2+3. Laine's goal yesterday was assisted by Niku and Aho, not Puljujärvi. Sopanen should have the secondary assist to Lämsä's goal. Niku's goal was assisted by Nättinen. And these are only the mistakes concerning team Finland. Do they have a lottery to decide these stats?The stats in this tournament are all sorts of messed up. At least the goal scorers have been identified correctly thus far (to my knowledge).
Yeah, the stat-keeping has been pretty bad. Lot's of Swedsh goals missing assists as well. It's just exhibition games though so official points don't carry much importance.
Bringing Virtanen to this discussion is truly an extreme and simplistic example, I agree. Laine and Puljujärvi have clearly more skill and better vision, and are already capable of making a bigger impact on the ice than him. Matthews has marginally better hockey sense than Laine and Puljujärvi, but partly that goes with the territory of being older and more experienced. I don't think Matthews' hands or playmaking ability are better than Laine's or Puljujärvi's, at least not to an extent that it would make much of a difference on the ice. Defensively Matthews is smarter as of now, but Laine's and Puljujärvi's strong checking and ability to break up opponents plays is a valuable asset as well. I agree that a centre is in many cases more valuable than a winger.Jake Virtanen is bigger, stronger, and faster than Sam Reinhart, has a better shot, and is 8 months younger. But Sam Reinhart is obviously the superior prospect. This is a very extreme and simplistic example, but the conclusion is the same: hockey sense. Matthews has better hockey sense, better defensive ability, and better hands. He's the better playmaker. And he is simply more valuable for being a center rather than a winger.
Matthews is more well-rounded, but Laine is more talented I think. There's no point in debating which one is more selfish or unselfish, what counts is production and being a winning player. Laine certainly isn't too selfish, especially considering the role he plays in.However, Laine is just clearly not on that level. Matthews is just plainly more talented, smarter, more unselfish, more well-rounded.
You might not care how these guys perform in a summer camp, but I'm sure scouts do, they wouldn't have flocked to Lake Placid if that wasn't the case.I really don't care how they perform in a summer camp, particularly Matthews and Puljujarvi, who know they're locks for their respective teams.
Matthews wasn't better than Puljujärvi at the World Juniors. Matthews might have been slightly better than Laine and Puljujärvi at the WU18C's, but it was his 2nd tourney at that level, so he had the advantage of being both older and more experienced. Now that the new season is starting up it's obvious that Laine and Puljujärvi have caught up to Matthews and might have even overtaken him.If your only evidence that your two guys are better than Matthews, you clearly don't understand the importance of sample size.
Certainly not true anymore.Laine lacks speed/agility.
Pulju is no Selänne when it comes to finishing his chances, but I believe that the critique over his finishing ability is strongly overexaggerated due to the unlucky streak he had at World Juniors. The kid can put the puck into the net.Puljujarvi lacks finishing ability (the shots that are accurate aren't hard, and vice versa).
I have to admit that I unnecessarily compare his skating to Puljujarvi's, which still looks so much smoother and quicker. Emphasis on the word "looks". I might have an untrained eye when it comes to detecting actual speed and acceleration. Perhaps earlier experience makes me see clunkiness that isn't there anymore.Certainly not true anymore.
Strongly overexaggerated, yes, but still a "concern" when weighing on the whole "who's to be #1" issue. Or, in other words, compared to Laine.Pulju is no Selänne when it comes to finishing his chances, but I believe that the critique over his finishing ability is strongly overexaggerated due to the unlucky streak he had at World Juniors. The kid can put the puck into the net.
Yup, the actual scoring leader of the tournament is Sebastian AhoOh my, I looked through the highlights again and noticed that Aho should have been credited with 2+4 in the 10-3 blowout against USA Blue. That would put him at 2+5 on the whole.
Yup, the actual scoring leader of the tournament is Sebastian Aho![]()
That's a difficult question, both are highly intriguing prospects. Hopefully the upcoming season brings some answers.Who is the better prospect for you right now Puljujärvi or Laine?
Why was Turgeon put in an offensive role for this game? He's not a talented offensive player and he was a total non-factor tonight. I don't need to see anymore.
Why are they messing around with Schmaltz on the point of the pp again? It didn't work last year and I don't see it working this year. Besides, he should be working to earn some pp time at this point rather than just having it handed to him.
Collins has regressed back to the worst I've seen of him. He brings no mobility, no sense, no offense and no toughness. Why is he still in play here? Werenski is more noticeable on the right side anyway so shift him back over there and be done with it.
Bittner was a huge disappointment in this game and his bad penalties almost sunk the team. I don't feel he is a good enough talent for an offensive role and I don't think he brings the energy or intensity for a depth role. He's on the outside looking in in my mind.
Bracco and Matthews clearly don't work together. You'd think someone from the NTDP would have explained the fact that the two were never slotted together rather than trying something that never worked before.
Matthews has not been 1st overall quality here and I can't argue in his favor in any 2016 prospect debate right now. He should clearly be the best player on the US team but he's just not playing like it. I don't know if it has to do with the uncertainty as to where he's playing next season or the constant linemate rotation but it'd be nice to see him make some kind of statement (ala Eichel's 8 points in two games last year) before the end of the camp. How about they just do something logical like play him with his old linemates Tkachuk and Roslovic?
I get it, these games don't matter, but it'd be nice to believe something is being accomplished with all of this.
That's a difficult question, both are highly intriguing prospects. Hopefully the upcoming season brings some answers.
whats the lineup for todays game? anyone know?
Milano - Larkin - Boeser
Bittner - Dvorak - Bjork
Tkachuk - Eansor - Roslovic
Connor - Turgeon - Bracco
Schmaltz
Werenski - Krys
Walman - Jones
Hanifin - McAvoy
Carlo
Sarthou
Opilka
Milano - Larkin - Boeser
Bittner - Dvorak - Bjork
Tkachuk - Eansor - Roslovic
Connor - Turgeon - Bracco
Schmaltz
Werenski - Krys
Walman - Jones
Hanifin - McAvoy
Carlo
Sarthou
Opilka
Why isn't Matthews playing?
There are still 18 forwards in camp for Team USA, he's a lock for the team, and they want to get a look at different forwards and line combinations. Same reason Larkin sat out yesterday.
By the way what will happen, if Team USA can't participate world juniors in Helsinki.
Because of world's political reasons, USA has put sanctions for Russia because of their attack war in Ukraine.
World Juniors medal games will be held in Hartwall Arena, and arenas owners ( Rotenberg Family and Russian businessman Gennady Timtchenko)
Belongs to USA's sanction list.
This means that USA can't keep in touch or any contact those peoples who belongs USA sanction list.
And also if USA makes to Medal games after preliminary round USA can't play their medal games in Hartwall Arena because of those sanctions.
https://vid.me/Aeap
Finland's goals from yesterday. Credit to erikfromfin
Sopanen has at least 3 assists in this tournament yet he has 0 according to the stats keepers.