CraigBillington
Registered User
- Dec 10, 2010
- 1,827
- 1,739
- New
- Add bookmark
- #26
Ku
Contract wise, even at 50%, Kuz still will cost the kings twice as much. Beauvillier has a bit more all round value as he doesnt hurt the team when he doesn't have the puck as much. Also, because Washington paid a late 2nd for the pick doesn't mean anyone got fleeced in this trade. Value is about what you'd expect for Kuz. Given where the standings are, Washington would likely pick around 60, while the LA pick is around 80-85. Not a big difference at that stage of the draftWow, Fanny fleeced. No way 50% retention on Kuzmenko is worth less than a full retention Beauvillier.
Kuz>Beau without a doubt.