- Aug 14, 2011
- 3,754
- 923
To Columbus:
Askarov, Nyquist, Fabbro, TB 2025 1st
To Nashville:
Laine 50% retained
Askarov, Nyquist, Fabbro, TB 2025 1st
To Nashville:
Laine 50% retained
Way too much coming from Nashville.To Columbus:
Askarov, Nyquist, Fabbro, TB 2025 1st
To Nashville:
Laine 50% retained
(emphasis added)What I find personally annoying is that up until last season's results I would have had the perfect answer for a Laine trade right about now. Fabbro + Nyquist. Done. But then Nyquist had to go on that ludicrously insane career year of career years and so obviously there's no way that would even remotely fly. Harrumph.
I mean, if you want to pretend the risks aren't there, that's fine, that's your prerogative. It's actually kind of a breath of fresh air versus the usual approach of folks blowing them way the hell out of proportion. But c'mon, hon, you're using Askarov practically as a throw-in.Laine is only 26 and has 117 points in his last 129 games and is a monster. He’s worth a lot and the 50% retained for Nashville makes it worthwhile big time.
Hell they'd take probaly it for Askarov, let alone all the extras.
I'd have made a proposal thread here along those lines ages ago except that I think the Preds need Nyquist for the same reasons and to play the same sort of role he'd be wanted for up here, so I've kept hesitating. Maybe if it was any other team I'd have gone "they've got RoR, they're fine on vets" and gone with it anyways, but it's a little different when you're a fan of both of the teams.The Preds very much need to get some high end players under the age of 30 who have a chance to grow with the team. Desperately.
And Laine at 50% is a very valuable asset. So I don't think Askarov and a late 1st is too much for that.
But Nyquist has a lot of value on his own now, that's a tremendous contract too after the season he just had. He'd be very much welcome back in Columbus.
Nyquist and a late 1st ought to cover the deal, in my estimation.
Wasn't really thinking about the 50% retention I suppose. I think there's an extremely small chance of that happening after DWs comments.For Laine at 50%? I don't know about that.
I probably would because I like Askarov and I don't care about the retention but teams are always very hesitant to retain that much.
I'd have made a proposal thread here along those lines ages ago except that I think the Preds need Nyquist for the same reasons and to play the same sort of role he'd be wanted for up here, so I've kept hesitating. Maybe if it was any other team I'd have gone "they've got RoR, they're fine on vets" and gone with it anyways, but it's a little different when you're a fan of both of the teams.
I'm less concerned about that since Laine was also doing very well 5v5 here, but yeah, that does make for less value recouped for Nashville.Another thought. Signing Stamkos - whose contribution at this point is entirely on the PP - might preclude Laine from fitting with the Preds. They both want to play on their one timer side, same spot, and it does have to be #1PP for both.
I'm less concerned about that since Laine was also doing very well 5v5 here, but yeah, that does make for less value recouped for Nashville.
Technically Stamkos is also there for locker room reasons. Nashville's also got a bunch of kids Learning On The Job as it is - the prospect pool is comparable to the Jackets' in depth, although without the really high-end highly picked guys. So that's supposed to be the other part of Stamkos' value.Well Laine will still be good without getting the cush job on the PP, but Stamkos would not. And they just gave him four years??
He has also missed on average 31 games a season over the past 4 years. Even if you remove last years anomaly of 64 games, he has missed 63 of the possible 220 games (1 season was 56 games) or roughly 28.6% of the possible games. You dont trade one of your best trade chips (askarov) and a 1st ontop of a good veteran forward who on his own could possibly net you a 1st round pick for someone who misses so much time.Laine is only 26 and has 117 points in his last 129 games and is a monster. He’s worth a lot and the 50% retained for Nashville makes it worthwhile big time.
Id be down for something around Nyquist or Novak and Fabbro/Glass for Laine with retention but the original offer here is just too much for someone so oft injured.Technically Stamkos is also there for locker room reasons. Nashville's also got a bunch of kids Learning On The Job as it is - the prospect pool is comparable to the Jackets' in depth, although without the really high-end highly picked guys. So that's supposed to be the other part of Stamkos' value.
Beyond that... well, UFA signings, what can you do.