FrozenRoyalty
Registered User
- Feb 5, 2008
- 1,903
- 565
I want McNabb to be to Doughty what Norstrom was to Rob Blake. Hopefully those two become a permanent pairing for a long time.
McNabb is really the key to the defense. We go as he goes. We'll go as far as he takes us. He sets our tone. He is our flying spaghetti monster.
I just don't think McNabb has the lateral movement and quickness to be anywhere near as good defensively as Norstrom. There is no shame in that, but McNabb will be better served avoiding the best offensive players from the opposition every shift.
As long as he helps to keep Greene in the press box, I'm a happy man.![]()
Still scares me we are one injury away from Greene back in there, hopefully that can be addressed at the deadline.
I am a big McNabb fan, his handing was awful last year, hopefully he can keep playing strong and get back to the level he was at last season before the benching,
If McNabb really turns into a top pairing defensemen, it will be one of the top 5 trades DL ever made. Not that what we gave up was garbage, but I dont think Deslauriers or Fasching ever become top line players. Or even 2nd line.
People undervalue Green on this board. Its still early in the season. He is an older defenseman that was playing though an injury and needs time to heal up and get back in the groove. While not apparent now, we can't have our entire defense be composed of puck moving offensive defensemen. We need a defenseman like Green and Regher to play physical and importantly pin the offensive players down low, which is especially critical in the playoffs where there is less time and space.
I wouldn't mind having Green take all the time that he needs early in the year to recover so that we can use him in the playoffs when it counts (if we make it).
People undervalue Green on this board. Its still early in the season. He is an older defenseman that was playing though an injury and needs time to heal up and get back in the groove. While not apparent now, we can't have our entire defense be composed of puck moving offensive defensemen. We need a defenseman like Green and Regher to play physical and importantly pin the offensive players down low, which is especially critical in the playoffs where there is less time and space.
I wouldn't mind having Green take all the time that he needs early in the year to recover so that we can use him in the playoffs when it counts (if we make it).
You are talking about Matt Greene circa 2011 and 2012. Time and age has passed him by and most forwards do as well. Every f***ing game. He can't hit and forecheck if the guy is already past him by 15 feet in the defensive zone. And then he takes a dumbass penalty.
So no, we are not undervaluing him. He is a leader in the room, no doubt about it. But on the ice now? I think it's very telling that Carter was wearing an "A" against Colorado.
You are talking about Matt Greene circa 2011 and 2012. Time and age has passed him by and most forwards do as well. Every f***ing game. He can't hit and forecheck if the guy is already past him by 15 feet in the defensive zone. And then he takes a dumbass penalty.
So no, we are not undervaluing him. He is a leader in the room, no doubt about it. But on the ice now? I think it's very telling that Carter was wearing an "A" against Colorado.
Don't know why it's telling. Greene wasn't in the lineup, due to injury, so they gave the A to Carter, a seasoned vet, who's moved up the leadership ladder with Richards, Stoll and Williams gone.
Gawd!
Can't you guys just like one player without hatin' on another??? Is it cool to hate, is it?
Greene maybe slower, but he also serves a purpose out on the ice. Stop the hate boys.
So they are taking the A away from Carter when Greene returns from his injury?