Frolov 6'3
Unregistered User
However people never forget to come up with points and assists (which i have always said are overrated) when it fits their narrative.People forget that players can get points while not playing well.
Kempe, especially to start the season, was floating and not digging in board battles. Byfield and Kopitar were digging in the trenches. His passes were off. His reception of passes were off.
Fox mentioned in one of the telecasts that while Kempe doesn't pay attention to metrics specifically, he looks up where he's been scoring.
He spent a chunk of the beginning relying heavily on just shooting from where he scored before. He put up points, but he wasn't physically engaged at times when it mattered, and he wasn't scoring in ways where he just expected goals to go in for him.
It's the mindset of Ovechkin without having his talent. And it was that refusal to work on elements of his game that sunk a first overall pick like Yakupov. I'm not comparing Kempe to Yakupov, but the quality of his on-ice play was betrayed by the points he put up.
Fiala... is there legit questioning that he's not been playing well? It's why he was separated from PLD. Neither were. He takes undisciplined penalties. On almost a daily basis he makes no-look backhand passes that get picked off from the opposition (or it just plain misses his target).
I'll never understand the aversion to bringing up shortcomings that could be an issue. Nobody's saying they have to be perfect, but they're the ones people are expecting to score, and these issues could inhibit their ability to keep scoring if the behaviors continue.
No matter what, there are 82 games in a season and you can’t play mistake free hockey for 82 games. I get a little bit tired to see people point out some shortcomings. Yes I understand this aversion when you are 4th in the league in points. Its terribly annoying. Neither I am a fan to think we are contenders. I think we can surprise.
Some think LA is playing in a beer league. This is the NHL.
Last edited: