Kucherov Appears to Intentionally Trip Rasmussen As He Scores

[BobCole]

Kucherov is so skilled but he's got the emotional regulation and sportsmanship of an unhinged three year old.

 

[KCC]

Kucherov is one of the whiniest, saltiest players in the league and has been doing dirty things like this his entire career. This deserves a suspension for intent to injure. Dangerous, stupid play.

 

[crowfish]

He gets angry when he sees others scoring via his favourite method.

 

[Hint1k]

You realize that tripping in that situation can break the guy's leg, right?

You realize that every tripping can break a guy's leg? The only difference here is that you have hatred agenda. If you would not have it, you would have a same comment for every tripping happened in hockey.

You can excuse 99% of dirty plays by stating that "X player had no time to think".

I don't think for a second that you will bring out the same argument when a player of your team is the victim of a dirty play.

These types of blanket arguments that can be used to explain everything are stupid.

I always bring the same type of argument. And I consider most of the main board topics stupid as hell and this discussion of the tripping is probably the most stupid of them all.

I suggest to open a new topic - about a player who made a clean shoulder hit (the opposite player said in an interview that the hit was clean) and you will see that multiple HF posters will call it dirty anyway. It is the only topic that will outdo in stupidity this one.

Tripping is one of the most common penalties. Intentionally doing it after a guy has already scored into an empty net isn't. Intentionally sending a guy into the goal or end boards is incredibly dangerous, and based on past history probably deserves a suspension.

First of all you need to actually watch the game in discussion since you clearly watched some other game where some other player tripped someone after the goal.
Second, you need to turn off your mind reading skill.
Third, the only problem in this case is that you clearly have hatred agenda that makes you invent things.

------------

P.s. The only thing this topic shows is the level of hatred towards Kucherov. Since tripping is very common and not some dirty play. An attempt to stop a player with the puck by tripping, hooking or holding if you can't stop him without them - is the right thing to do and it happens almost every game and done by almost every player.

And your arguments that the goalie is not in the net, therefore it is some sort of special dirty tripping and not the usual tripping and therefore has to be called "dirty" and punished differently, equals this:

"It is not a crime to steal things from some shop as long as a security guard is there, but if the security guard is not there then it is a jail time for the thief"

 

[Pavels Dog]

Kucherov is probably the league’s least likeable superstar. Just seems like a colossal douchebag.

 

[LightningStrikes]

Reckless play.

 

[Hazy Little Thing]

You realize that tripping in that situation can break the guy's leg, right?

Or ribs if he hits the post or neck if he hits the boards. Incredibly dangerous non-hockey play by Kucherov.

 

[Hazy Little Thing]

You realize that every tripping can break a guy leg? The only difference here is that you have hatred agenda. If not, you would have a thread for every tripping happened in hockey and called every player who tripped someone dirty.

I understand that some posters here haven’t played hockey, and some posters have language barriers so I’ll excuse you here.

Not all trips are equal. Accidentally tripping someone in the neutral zone going for the puck =/= intentionally tripping someone full speed on a breakaway 5M away from the boards.

Dirty/dangerous/despicable

Tampa fans won’t even defend the guy.

 

[Geoist]

I love him :p

Judging by your avatar, you really like POS players.

Dirty as heck atleast one game, but Ras needs to be ready for anything.

wtf does this even mean?

 

[Matty Sundin]

Is there a more grumpy hockey player then Kucherov?

 

[Geoist]

Correct play by Kucherov. What he should have done?

So would it be cool to take a whack at a guy's head with stick to prevent them from scoring? I mean, you gotta do anything and everything you can to win, right?

 

[Hint1k]

So would it be cool to take a whack at a guy's head with stick to prevent them from scoring? I mean, you gotta do anything and everything you can to win, right?

Why stop at slashing to the head, there is also assault rifles available?

This has got to be the dumbest post I've seen on this board, and that is saying something.

It because you can't understand what it means.

 

[dirtydanglez]

someone should grab hold of him and just start feeding him. i wouldn't care that he's a skilled player and way out of his weight class.

 

[Geoist]

Why stop at slashing to the head, there is also assault rifles available?

You're the one arguing he should do whatever he can to not lose, and that includes taking penalties that directly put the opponent in a position of a career-ending injury. So I'd like to know how far you'd take it: stick whack to the head or no?

It because you can't understand what it means.

No, don't blame other for your idiotic posts and dumb analogies.

 

[Voodoo Child]

Dirty play but damn, I wish Matthews and Marner would do things like that from time to time, maybe then opposing players wouldn't f*** with them.

 

[Geoist]

You are the one arguing that. Taking a penalty to prevent scoring is normal thing in hockey. Every player does that.

Not every penalty is equal. This has been pointed out to you, already. That is why I asked, why not stick whack to the head?

Rasmussen was in a position where a trip leads to him either crashing into the net or the boards.

 

[mr figgles]

Kucherov is arguably the most talented and skilled cheap shot artist post expansion.

Evgeni Malkin says hi

 

[Geoist]

This was already answered.

Oh, really. Then provide post #.

You simply can't understand the answer, because of the analogy.

The analogy that was so bad and idiotic that I feel embarrassment by proxy.

 

[ArGarBarGar]

Reminds me of Yandle tripping Zetterberg in game 7 back in 2010.

 

[Hint1k]

The analogy that was so bad and idiotic that I feel embarrassment by proxy.

Here is what some chatbot thinks about the analogy:

• Intent doesn’t always align with outcomes:
  
  • A good intent can lead to bad outcomes (e.g., trying to help someone but accidentally causing harm).
  • A bad intent can lead to good outcomes (e.g., someone attempts to harm but inadvertently helps).

Implications of the Argument:​

• Judging actions solely based on intent ignores the real-world consequences that can follow.
• Both intent and outcomes should be considered when evaluating actions because focusing on just one creates moral blind spots.

So the chatbot can understand it and you don't. Are you sure you can actually participate in this discussion? You know adults here talking.

 

[Vasilevskiy]

yeah that was intentional, fine him

 

[Nikolajs Sillers]

Everyone knows that he's dirty player. Been that way forever.

 

[Geoist]

Here is what some chatbot thinks about the analogy:

• Intent doesn’t always align with outcomes:
  
  • A good intent can lead to bad outcomes (e.g., trying to help someone but accidentally causing harm).
  • A bad intent can lead to good outcomes (e.g., someone attempts to harm but inadvertently helps).

Implications of the Argument:​

• Judging actions solely based on intent ignores the real-world consequences that can follow.
• Both intent and outcomes should be considered when evaluating actions because focusing on just one creates moral blind spots.

So the chatbot can understand it and you don't. Are you sure you can actually participate in this discussion? You know adults here talking.

And bad intents can lead to bad outcomes (e.g. Kuch's trip). But please keep defending your garbage analogy. You're winning everyone over. /s

 

[Fishy McScales]

You are the one arguing that. Taking a penalty to prevent scoring is normal thing in hockey. Every player does that.


It because you reading skill is not really good enough to deal with analogies. You should probably work on that.

Taking a penalty to prevent an EN goal is an automatic goal, you know that right?

 

[Rodgerwilco]

Dirtbag play by a proven dirtbag player. I have no clue why anyone would spin this is being cool or funny.