Chytilmania
Registered User
- Dec 31, 2017
- 4,761
- 7,277
Sounds great. Now I want to see Gallant actually do that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6c72/c6c721e94d9ab9228256aa45a6bb513f45fc4ecb" alt="quid-pro-quo-hannibal.gif"
Sounds great. Now I want to see Gallant actually do that.
Well, yeah, but stranger things have happened.Holy hyperbole, Batman.
Well, yeah, but stranger things have happened.
Krav just finished his D+4, Kuch hit the NHL in his D+4 and scored 18 points in 52 games.
D+5 Kuch scored 65 pts in 82 games.
I think expecting that production from Krav this year is unrealistic, but then again the poster said "It would be nice..." Hahahaha.
Huh? Those are pretty positive words, especially given the beef that's transpired.Wouldn’t classify this as a ringing endorsement
I know youtube highlights are not a way to judge talent, if it was I could also post that sick Balej goal from years back...
But if Kravtsov can have this kind of swagger and confidence in the NHL he's going to be real good. I hope the coaching staff helps him grow his confidence in the NHL.
I know space and all that on larger rinks. But Fox breaks ankles on a regular basis.
.......
BTW here's the Balej goal lol
He will now be adding the "Russian Slice" to his dessert menu.
Huh? Those are pretty positive words, especially given the beef that's transpired.
Balej beat Karl Dykhuis.![]()
No, he will be with the team this year.So are we thinking he’s gone for the right package ?
Recoup picks or a prospect ?
No, he will be with the team this year.
I doubt any team will offer enough in return for us to take the risk. We're under no pressure to trade him.
Have an odd feeling that he ends up in LA.Wouldn’t classify this as a ringing endorsement
Odds are we are going to lose that deal. Can you see anyone offering better than a 2nd round pick or a prospect who likely has less potential? If we are going to trade him, it has to be for something that has real potential to make a difference. If Kravtsov completely flames out and we get a 3rd instead of a 2nd, it isn't the end of the world. But if we take a 2nd for him and then he explodes, we're going to look very foolish.I guess but I’d be worried he will have a other hissy fit so just move him for the right deal
LOL - so awesome.Speaking of slice, you know how much EdJovo loves Kravstov? If Vitali posted a pic of himself in front of Patsy's declaring the best pizza ever, EdJovo would comment that Pizza Hut is better but then delete it and replace it with "I've been there 5 times, it's the best!"
I wouldn't expect much in return for any of those players.But again I maintain this, Drury needs to move Gauthier, Hajek, and Georgiev to recoup some picks and use Lundkvist to get that 2C.
He can’t truly be measured by manmade concepts like weight as he isn’t bound by gravity nor the laws of physics for that matter.What's his actual weight?
Is he still a rail? 6'3 190lbs seems meh.
4-5-6th rounders.I wouldn't expect much in return for any of those players.
What 2C are we getting for Lundkvist?
The best outcome is he sticks and performs well. Rangers either re-sign him or trade him for much higher value. Trading him now would be extremely foolish, considering we'd get a lackluster return, not to mention his contract is perfect for our cap crunch predicament.Unless this is deeply personal or Drury wants to make a statement about his no nonsense management style etc. I don't see a reasonable offer coming to the Rangers that is as valuable as the player Kravtsov could be, could become, and the salary he's making and the team control the team has.
We would be insane to trade him if he plays well. Let alone it would make no sense.The best outcome is he sticks and performs well. Rangers either re-sign him or trade him for much higher value. Trading him now would be extremely foolish, considering we'd get a lackluster return, not to mention his contract is perfect for our cap crunch predicament.