Really good combination of character and skill.
I was lookin at our teams stats this weekend and did a double take when I saw that too. And the next closest teammate is at +6. Still good for 25 points this season as well.
Much better for sure.
I think Oleksiak has value simply because of his size and how other GM's view him. In my mind replace him and pair Montour with a more steady stay-at-home D-man who is mobile and can skate. Should make that pairing much more effective.
Regarding Dunn, I know he never seemed like a fast skater but he just seems slow this season. Not sure if its an injury, something mental or just lack of interest. Either way, the team depends a lot on him for our offense. The team's offensive production is noticeably worse without him on the roster. So like you said, hopefully Francis evaluates this carefully before throwing money at Dunn. When he is on, he does play like a #1D. Or close to it. But does he want to be here?
Addition by subtraction maybe. So often Dunn's play has seemed aimless and inattentive. He looks like he wants out of here some nights, and more and more I'm thinking we should accomodate him for the good of the team.Ancient history perhaps, but it’s hard for me to NOT factor in that Dunn acted petulant when he was unhappy with his situation in STL to the point I think they were happy to be rid of him?
The bolded are the main reasons I am a little concerned about him. I know Francis has talked the big talk about playoffs and signed players like Montour and Stephenson last off-season to help but obviously it has been an unmitigated disaster.Addition by subtraction maybe. So often Dunn's play has seemed aimless and inattentive. He looks like he wants out of here some nights, and more and more I'm thinking we should accomodate him for the good of the team.
Lmao Blackhawks been “tanking” for 5 years now, longer than the Kraken franchise has even existed. How’s that working out for them?First we should fire Ron Francis.
Second, we should trade anybody over the age of 30.
Then we should tank (like we should have done years ago) and start a hard reset. This team is hot garbage with no hope of a Stanley cup winning core emerging from our current prospect pool.
Probably better than the Kraken considering I'd take Bedard/Carlsson/Fantilli over anything the Kraken have.Lmao Blackhawks been “tanking” for 5 years now, longer than the Kraken franchise has even existed. How’s that working out for them?
I don't think Chicago should even have a team, lmao. They should have been moved to Houston or Utah instead of Arizona. I mentioned Carlsson and Fantilli because Chicago (or any other team that finished last) was guaranteed one of those 3 players (or Michkov) and because it should be one of the best drafts in history...the kind of draft everyone tanks for.No clue why you mention Carlsson or Fantilli. Did Anaheim or CBJ ever straight up TANK like Chicago has been doing for 5 seasons? Nope. Absolute gong show of a franchise, but sure let’s follow their lead.
Pick a direction. That's all I care about. Either commit to continue drafting and load up on prospects till some of them click. i.e 2-3 years more to see how Catton, Rehkopf, Sale, Firkus, whoever we get this season, etc. click at the NHL level.Regardless I'm still an advocate as well that Francis doesn't need to make any major changes. I would prefer that he did, but regardless of where we finish this team isn't a single McKenna away from winning. It would help a f*** ton, but there are other paths to winning as well.
Building via FA definitely isn't possible and if we do want to make the playoffs and win then I agree that we need to make trades to get there.Pick a direction. That's all I care about. Either commit to continue drafting and load up on prospects till some of them click. i.e 2-3 years more to see how Catton, Rehkopf, Sale, Firkus, whoever we get this season, etc. click at the NHL level.
If you don't want to wait and win today, then make some moves that actually make that possible. No half-assed effort like adding a Stephenson, Burakovsky, etc. level of talent. Actually go for players who are game changers even if it costs picks/prospects. You don't have to sacrifice the future completely, but some risks need to be taken if you choose to go this route.
Pick a direction. That's all I care about. Either commit to continue drafting and load up on prospects till some of them click. i.e 2-3 years more to see how Catton, Rehkopf, Sale, Firkus, whoever we get this season, etc. click at the NHL level.
If you don't want to wait and win today, then make some moves that actually make that possible. No half-assed effort like adding a Stephenson, Burakovsky, etc. level of talent. Actually go for players who are game changers even if it costs picks/prospects. You don't have to sacrifice the future completely, but some risks need to be taken if you choose to go this route.
Could be. But if that is the way Francis chooses to go again, then it really reflects on his issues as a GM. Does he really think that doing the same thing again will have different results? And that management or the fans actually think signing another B-grade player will make an impact on our team performance?Well, we've been talking about that for quite some time.
I expect another offseason like last season with B-Level free agents and a trade for a good(but not great) player.
And then we're "competitive" again...
![]()
I've always preferred the building through the draft option, but I'm getting ever closer to the just-pick-a-direction point of view. What I don't want is another off-season like the last one which led not to a team capable of competing to squeak into the Playoffs but to the dullest, least engaging, continuously frustrating hockey in Kraken history. We seemed to have an identity in the first two years of a scrappy, fast-skating team that every night gave better teams fits through hard-work and persistence. This year's team was a far cry from that. Francis needs to show more creativity this off-season than he may possess.Could be. But if that is the way Francis chooses to go again, then it really reflects on his issues as a GM. Does he really think that doing the same thing again will have different results? And that management or the fans actually think signing another B-grade player will make an impact on our team performance?
I certainly don't know what Francis is thinking but it is his job on the line here. It is a situation of his own making but his future will be tied to what happens next season UNLESS he goes the route of stacking more high picks via off-season trades. If he is stacking picks, I would guess he has more leeway from management and that management does not necessarily want to win now, but just be better. We can do that without adding to the roster and maybe just improving the coaching without really moving any futures.
The next few months will be very telling.
That being said, my gut tells me that Francis is not going to be quiet this off-season. He is certainly going to try and improve the team and like you, my gut tells me it may just end up being a B-grade player I am hoping that I am wrong.
I've always preferred the building through the draft option, but I'm getting ever closer to the just-pick-a-direction point of view. What I don't want is another off-season like the last one which led not to a team capable of competing to squeak into the Playoffs but to the dullest, least engaging, continuously frustrating hockey in Kraken history. We seemed to have an identity in the first two years of a scrappy, fast-skating team that every night gave better teams fits through hard-work and persistence. This year's team was a far cry from that. Francis needs to show more creativity this off-season than he may possess.
A few others and I mentioned this already but can't be both bad and boring. This season offered very little entertainment unless you enjoy inflicting pain on yourself.Amen. I don’t really care so much about wins and losses per se as I do about competitiveness. There have been wholly uncompetitive losses this year, but also wins where the Kraken simply played less awful than the other team. People watch and buy tickets to be entertained. Play a bunch of hardworking kids that never quit, or sign veterans that don’t blow two goal leads every frickin’ home game. Whatever. But pick one and make the Kraken a fun team to watch.
A few others and I mentioned this already but can't be both bad and boring. This season offered very little entertainment unless you enjoy inflicting pain on yourself.
Could be. But if that is the way Francis chooses to go again, then it really reflects on his issues as a GM. Does he really think that doing the same thing again will have different results? And that management or the fans actually think signing another B-grade player will make an impact on our team performance?
I certainly don't know what Francis is thinking but it is his job on the line here. It is a situation of his own making but his future will be tied to what happens next season UNLESS he goes the route of stacking more high picks via off-season trades. If he is stacking picks, I would guess he has more leeway from management and that management does not necessarily want to win now, but just be better. We can do that without adding to the roster and maybe just improving the coaching without really moving any futures.
The next few months will be very telling.
That being said, my gut tells me that Francis is not going to be quiet this off-season. He is certainly going to try and improve the team and like you, my gut tells me it may just end up being a B-grade player I am hoping that I am wrong.
A few others and I mentioned this already but can't be both bad and boring. This season offered very little entertainment unless you enjoy inflicting pain on yourself.
I know I am in the minority on our boards but I think Marner could be a great piece for us to have. But I see a very little chance that he leaves Toronto. And if he does, I am pretty sure he will have better destinations that ours UNLESS he decides he wants to be the guy on a team, in which case, he will easily be that guy.Though, given that he's still around I hope he tries to bring in talent by trade and not in free agency.
Unless Marner, for whatever reason besides and insane amount of money, chooses Seattle in free agency(if he ver makes it there) there's no reason to try and go for the rest of the free agent class and do the usual overpayment for an older guy.
So hopefully Francis uses his assets to bring in guys via trade, sign- and trade or offer sheets.
It is hard to be impressed by a coach who ended up winning fewer games and with fewer points that his predecessor did.BTW: I'm also really unimpressed by Bylsma. I don't think he's anything special coaching wise unless he has prime Crosby and Malkin on his roster.
Excellent point.It is hard to be impressed by a coach who ended up winning fewer games and with fewer points that his predecessor did.
Re: Marner, one thing I learned from the Trade subforum recently is that every single team anticipates having a boatload of open cap space this off-season. In a “free spending” competitive climate like that, I think there is a zero % chance Marner goes to a team like Seattle.I know I am in the minority on our boards but I think Marner could be a great piece for us to have. But I see a very little chance that he leaves Toronto. And if he does, I am pretty sure he will have better destinations that ours UNLESS he decides he wants to be the guy on a team, in which case, he will easily be that guy.
I definitely see Francis targeting trades. I am not sure if he goes making offersheets unless its like a last ditch effort because while it could piss off other GM's, he may not even be around to deal with them.
It is hard to be impressed by a coach who ended up winning fewer games and with fewer points that his predecessor did.
Yeah. I have been following the general spaces and a lot of teams have a lot of cap space available for next season.Re: Marner, one thing I learned from the Trade subforum recently is that every single team anticipates having a boatload of open cap space this off-season. In a “free spending” competitive climate like that, I think there is a zero % chance Marner goes to a team like Seattle.
Excellent point.