Kopitar vs Bergeron vs Toews

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server

Who do you pick? In order of preference

  • Kopitar, Bergeron, Toews

    Votes: 68 49.3%
  • Kopitar, Toews, Bergeron

    Votes: 24 17.4%
  • Bergeron, Kopitar, Toews

    Votes: 18 13.0%
  • Bergeron, Toews, Kopitar

    Votes: 8 5.8%
  • Toews, Kopitar, Bergeron

    Votes: 13 9.4%
  • Toews, Bergeron, Kopitar

    Votes: 7 5.1%

  • Total voters
    138
Kopitar, Bergeron, Toews. My criteria is, who would win the head to head in a 7 game series on neutral ice? I think Kopitar can not only score as much if not more, he can defend as well if not better...in other words he would come out of top.

Kopitar in his prime was just bigger and stronger while having as much talent. That's my opinion.
If that were the deciding factor I’d take Toews first. Toews was a winner, often the best player on team Canada, and the hawks, during the most critical series, games and moments of those. People can argue it’s team success in many circumstances, but not when he is the best or among the very best in those career making moments.

Of course that’s in their prime though. Different opinion of who was best at age 33.
 
Bergeron and Kopitar had pretty equal offensive ability, the only real difference in their yearly point totals was utilization and PP time.

For their careers, they have basically identical ES PPG at 0.52 for Bergeron (666 in 1,294) and 0.55 for Kopitar (796 in 1,439). The difference is Bergeron in his prime averaged 45% o-zone starts to Kopitar's 55% o-zone starts and Kopitar had an extra 1 to 1:30 a year in PP time.

And Kopitar may have been physically bigger, but he didn't play bigger averaging under 50 hits and 30 PIM a season

Ah yes, the only known usage of size: hitting and fighting.
 
Dealer’s choice between Toews and Kopitar. I saw nearly every big game of Toews’ career and obviously lean in his favor. I won’t begrudge anyone choosing Kopitar. Bergeron is a clear number 3 for me personally.

Having watched all 3 of these guys since 2008 or so I think Toews peaked the highest, Kopitar was the best for longest, and Bergeron was the best defensively.
 
Because he doesn't come with Kane and Keith doing the heavy lifting.
Kopitar played with Doughty, Quick, and on very good teams often in his careee. Bergeron played with Chara and Rask/Thomas and the Bruins were usually a great regular season team.

Who is this mythical 1C carrying his team to greatness all in his back?
 
If I’m a GM, I want the highest peak as soon as possible from my drafted player.

Longevity is great, but I might not even be around to benefit from that.

So I went Toews (best peak and fastest to it), followed closely by Kopitar, and then Bergeron.

All 3 are fantastic players.

Because he doesn't come with Kane and Keith doing the heavy lifting.

Anybody attributing heavy lifting to Patrick Kane of all players surely didnt spend much time watching the Blackhawks :laugh:

He had some of the easiest minutes and sweetest deployment in the league thanks to Toews handling the other team’s big guns head to head.

Which made sense given his gifts and flaws as a player. But he didnt do the heavy lifting, he was the one benefitting most from the lifting.
 
Last edited:
Bergeron and Kopitar had pretty equal offensive ability, the only real difference in their yearly point totals was utilization and PP time.

For their careers, they have basically identical ES PPG at 0.52 for Bergeron (666 in 1,294) and 0.55 for Kopitar (796 in 1,439). The difference is Bergeron in his prime averaged 45% o-zone starts to Kopitar's 55% o-zone starts and Kopitar had an extra 1 to 1:30 a year in PP time.

And Kopitar may have been physically bigger, but he didn't play bigger averaging under 50 hits and 30 PIM a season
Love Bergeron to death but IMO Kopitar was clearly a better offensive player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic
If I’m a GM, I want the highest peak as soon as possible from my drafted player.

Longevity is great, but I might not even be around to benefit from that.

So I went Toews (best peak and fastest to it), followed closely by Kopitar, and then Bergeron.

Why is a sooner peak better than a later peak?
 
Which player led his team in scoring for 16 straight years? (from 2007-2008 to 2022-2023)
This says a lot about the skill around the players.
 

Ad

Ad