- Jun 15, 2007
- 8,394
- 7,054
I went with Kopitar, Bergeron and Toews
Toews has the best peaked, but his career was cut short
Bergeron is great, arguably the best defensive forward ever (At worst he's top 3) but he didn't have the size or offensive prowess of Kopitar
You get the player at 18 years old. They are just as injury prone/durable as they were during their careers but won't suffer the exact same injuries of course. They will always re-sign with your team as long as you offer them a fair deal.
Who do you pick?
Bergeron and Kopitar had pretty equal offensive ability, the only real difference in their yearly point totals was utilization and PP time.
For their careers, they have basically identical ES PPG at 0.52 for Bergeron (666 in 1,294) and 0.55 for Kopitar (796 in 1,439). The difference is Bergeron in his prime averaged 45% o-zone starts to Kopitar's 55% o-zone starts and Kopitar had an extra 1 to 1:30 a year in PP time.
And Kopitar may have been physically bigger, but he didn't play bigger averaging under 50 hits and 30 PIM a season
And Kopitar in his prime played in a very restrictive offensive systemBergeron also played with significantly better linemates through his best offensive seasons