Zman5778
Moderator
We have 2 legit center prospects in the system: Ostlund and Helenius.We have a logjam of 3C's
I wouldn't call that a logjam.
We have 2 legit center prospects in the system: Ostlund and Helenius.We have a logjam of 3C's
We have 2 legit center prospects in the system: Ostlund and Helenius.
I wouldn't call that a logjam.
Determining off the puck support is critical in evaluating a center's ability to translate from their draft season and in to the NHL. One of the major reasons why is due to the significance that puck support can have when determining a centers ability to control the middle portion of the ice for his team, and that’s Helenius’s bread and butter. His anticipation generates calculated positioning that keeps him above the puck on most sequences and it’s led to continuous zone exits in each viewing. This gives him the natural tendency to be a third defenseman when his team needs him to be. A lot of young forwards are in a hurry to join an attack and generally over step their offensive limits in an effort to try and make something happen while exiting the zone, but Konsta is seemingly always in control, rarely putting himself out of position, that’s complemented by his defensive awareness, when determining why he’s above the puck as frequently as he is.
Although he’s not a large center, he plays bigger than his size and comes with a natural strength that’s surprising. Towards the playoffs in Liiga, the games demanded more physicality and speed out of him, yet he took shifts over as opposed to getting drowned out. In-fact, we would label Helenius as one of the more difficult players to play against. He routinely cross checks players out of their position, and has a gritty, determined side to his game that’s complimentary to the rest of his skill-set. There’s a fall back approach to his play style, and he refuses to be intimidated when matching up against much larger players than himself.
No and yet to be determined. My personal guess is that Savoie is not going to be a full-time NHL center.Are Kulich and Savoie not centers?
Was that Pronman? Im not buying it. Good prospects always have valueThat instant grade of b- at the top of the thread mentioned it makes Adam's job harder as he has another similar prospect and it lowers the value of each of them. I'm kinda chewing on that right now.
Also from BB:
Not sure about that given the value that ARZ wanted for Chry from us & what he actually got traded forI mean maybe a little bit?
In reality, the team that wants one of what we have wants them because they need them, and that's what will drive the value imo. Seems like kind of oversimple logic and Adams hasn't flinched yet [ducks].
I think the thought process is you never can have enough.Are Kulich and Savoie not centers?
What about Wahlberg?We have 2 legit center prospects in the system: Ostlund and Helenius.
I wouldn't call that a logjam.
Pretty sure they see him as a power wingerWhat about Wahlberg?
Are Kulich and Savoie not centers?
What about Wahlberg?
I think with his playmaking ability he would work well with kulich as a 3rd line duo maybe but we have potential top 9 setup rather than traditional top 6 bottom 6I could see Helenius being a checking center. I don't see either Kulich or Savoie as successful NHL checking centers.
I don't think they look at him there.
I think with his playmaking ability he would work well with kulich as a 3rd line duo maybe but we have potential top 9 setup rather than traditional top 6 bottom 6
Evidently not. That's all I've heard all year.Are Kulich and Savoie not centers?
I am just looking 3 years down the road and seeing an absolute log jam. Adams has not shown yet to be willing to part with ANY prospects. Bloom is about it.
It's hard to gauge what to expect with Ruff so far. If he's thinking of a third-line that is entirely about shutting down the top-line of the opponent, I am all ears. Ostlund would be the center of that line ideally.In terms of role, I'm curious how they proceed. They tried having three offensive lines and a d-zone line for a while but without as much success. Perhaps they go with a more traditional setup, but