Proposal: Klefbom at 50% for Pokka+Gustafsson+

Status
Not open for further replies.

RememberTheRoar

“I’m not as worried about the 5-on-5 scoring.”
Oct 21, 2015
23,137
21,176
That's me in the corner
CHI: Oscar Klefbom with 50% retention ($2,083,500)

EDM: Ville Pokka, Erik Gustafsson, one more player (choice of: TVR, Gustav Forsling, Michal Kempny, or Ryan Hartman)

Chicago is willing to pay handsomely for seven years of a cost-controlled top-4 defenseman.

Edmonton sacrifices a little quality in exchange for quantity. Pokka, Gustafsson, Kempny, and TVR are all at least bottom-pairing right now; Pokka, Forsling, and Kempny could turn out to be a top-4 defenseman.

I'm pretty sure both fanbases will hate this proposal, but we'll see.
 

Blitzago*

Registered User
Dec 11, 2015
5,455
3
This is beyond terrible for the oilers.

We dont need to do a quality for quantity trade.
 

Blitzago*

Registered User
Dec 11, 2015
5,455
3
CHI: Oscar Klefbom with 50% retention ($2,083,500)

EDM: Ville Pokka, Erik Gustafsson, one more player (choice of: TVR, Gustav Forsling, Michal Kempny, or Ryan Hartman)

Chicago is willing to pay handsomely for seven years of a cost-controlled top-4 defenseman.

Edmonton sacrifices a little quality in exchange for quantity. Pokka, Gustafsson, Kempny, and TVR are all at least bottom-pairing right now; Pokka, Forsling, and Kempny could turn out to be a top-4 defenseman.

I'm pretty sure both fanbases will hate this proposal, but we'll see.
I'm pretty sure you made this post to get an uproar from both teams fans.
 

Finnish your Czech

J'aime Les offres hostiles
Nov 25, 2009
64,453
1,983
Toronto
This is one of the worst proposals I've seen lately. This is absolutely terrible in value for Edmonton.

Klefbom is a 23 year old top 4 defenceman. On a 7 year 2 million dollar contract makes him worth a lot more than a few not-elite prospects
 

ResilientBeast

Proud Member of the TTSAOA
Jul 1, 2012
13,903
3,561
Edmonton
So, we're retaining on our best/second best defenseman who is definitely a 2D right now for a bunch of bottom pairing guys?
 

Frank the Tank

The Godfather
Aug 15, 2005
16,356
14,281
Chicago, IL
It looks like there once again is no room for Pokka in Chicago with Kempny, Rozsival, and TVR ahead of him for a bottom-pairing spot. The Oilers (and other teams) can just wait a see if Pokka becomes disgruntled about having to report to Rockford again.
 

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,657
15,278
Pickering, Ontario
This is one of the worst proposals I've seen lately. This is absolutely terrible in value for Edmonton.

Klefbom is a 23 year old top 4 defenceman. On a 7 year 2 million dollar contract makes him worth a lot more than a few not-elite prospects
he doesn;t get paid 2 million dollars a year. It's something liek 3.5 or 4. But the deal is terrible for the oilers.
 
Apr 30, 2012
21,164
5,694
St. Louis, MO
CHI: Oscar Klefbom with 50% retention ($2,083,500)

EDM: Ville Pokka, Erik Gustafsson, one more player (choice of: TVR, Gustav Forsling, Michal Kempny, or Ryan Hartman)

Chicago is willing to pay handsomely for seven years of a cost-controlled top-4 defenseman.

Edmonton sacrifices a little quality in exchange for quantity. Pokka, Gustafsson, Kempny, and TVR are all at least bottom-pairing right now; Pokka, Forsling, and Kempny could turn out to be a top-4 defenseman.

I'm pretty sure both fanbases will hate this proposal, but we'll see.

That's not Chicago paying handsomely. There's no way Edmonton does that deal. Like at all.
 

McWeber

Mouthbreather
Jul 14, 2015
2,848
788
Lethbridge
Terrible proposal, Oilers didn't sign Klefbom for 7 years just to retain money and trade him for lesser players.
 

PuckG

Registered User
Feb 26, 2015
4,368
6,241
Klefbom is a second-pairing, is he not? I made this proposal working off that premise.

Klefbom was a #3, possibly a #2 that was trending up very well. Not interested in bottom-pairing defenseman who may or may not become top four defenseman.
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
101,045
14,921
Somewhere on Uranus
CHI: Oscar Klefbom with 50% retention ($2,083,500)

EDM: Ville Pokka, Erik Gustafsson, one more player (choice of: TVR, Gustav Forsling, Michal Kempny, or Ryan Hartman)

Chicago is willing to pay handsomely for seven years of a cost-controlled top-4 defenseman.

Edmonton sacrifices a little quality in exchange for quantity. Pokka, Gustafsson, Kempny, and TVR are all at least bottom-pairing right now; Pokka, Forsling, and Kempny could turn out to be a top-4 defenseman.

I'm pretty sure both fanbases will hate this proposal, but we'll see.
Oilers are not trading klefbom and they are certainly not retaining on one of their top pairing dmen.
 

ResilientBeast

Proud Member of the TTSAOA
Jul 1, 2012
13,903
3,561
Edmonton
Klefbom is a second-pairing, is he not? I made this proposal working off that premise. Looks like I severely undervalued Klef, apologies Oilers fans.

He's a borderline 2, making EDM retain 50% is adding insult to injury. You don't get a top pairing potential guy signed for 2 million for that crap
 

SB84

Registered User
Jul 22, 2015
1,784
183
Calgary, AB
Can you imagine Edmonton paying half of Kelfbom's salary for the next 7 years only to have him not play on their team haha. This proposal is so so sooooo bad.
 

A91

Oilers + Real Madrid
May 21, 2011
6,944
2,221
Edmonton
Klefbom is a second-pairing, is he not? I made this proposal working off that premise. Looks like I severely undervalued Klef, apologies Oilers fans.

He's a #3/2 dman currently. Thing is our biggest need is on D, so why would we trade one of our best D for prospects? Especially when we have Nurse and Reinhart who are both better than Pokka waiting in the AHL. Only way we trade Klef is for an upgrade on D.
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
101,045
14,921
Somewhere on Uranus
he doesn;t get paid 2 million dollars a year. It's something liek 3.5 or 4. But the deal is terrible for the oilers.

50% retention makez it 2 mill a year. The wheels in edmonton fell off when klefbom got injured last season. If the oilers got drunk and retained 50% they could get more then offered
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad