And there's the key point.he and Davis after both continued in the game.
And there's the key point.he and Davis after both continued in the game.
Actually the Soo tried to play Windsor with the physical game as well but it did not work out for them .Wish Windsor had played Flint first... they'd think Kitchener's "physicality" was tame in comparison. Or London last year.
I just find it funny that a bunch of Windsor posters thinks this is over the top. Tame compared to rnd 1Actually the Soo tried to play Windsor with the physical game as well but it did not work out for them .
And I think you're misinterpreting the LACK of headhunting in this series compared to KIT FLTI think you’re misinterpreting what is being said. The Soo series was way more physical than his series with the Rangers. The difference was that they weren’t head hunting like the Rangers seemingly are doing.
The flint and Kitchener series was way more physical from a damage standpoint. The Windsor Soo series was a cat fight in comparison. I watched a good chuck on that series and it seemed much calmer in comparison.I think you’re misinterpreting what is being said. The Soo series was way more physical than his series with the Rangers. The difference was that they weren’t head hunting like the Rangers seemingly are doing.
Like the one he threw at Humphries in game 1Swick is one of those tall players that gets caught with high hits. All teams likely have had a couple over the years.
Windsor's series had 134 penalty minutes (26.8 per game) in 5 games and Kitchener's series had 159 penalty minutes (31.8) in 5 games. Thats another 5 minutes of penalty's or per game happening in the Kitchener series.I think you’re misinterpreting what is being said. The Soo series was way more physical than his series with the Rangers. The difference was that they weren’t head hunting like the Rangers seemingly are doing.
So we agree. Too many headshots that need to be dealt with.And I think you're misinterpreting the LACK of headhunting in this series compared to KIT FLT
Damage? Other than Misil, who missed the first games against Windsor due to injury? And that play was just an unfortunate fall at a bad spot. Ellinas was self induced. Reid was back. How many regulars out of Kitcheners lineup in that series? Reid missed games. Misil and Ellinas out in game five. Not a lot of damage really. Christo missed a couple, Spellacy a couple and Woodall a season ender as well. The Soo series was physical. Those losses piled on to Mathurin, Belchetz and Winegard out before the series began with two of them likely season ending. That was 3 top 4 D and 2 top 6 forwards out. Who’s losses in the first series was potentially more damaging?The flint and Kitchener series was way more physical from a damage standpoint. The Windsor Soo series was a cat fight in comparison. I watched a good chuck on that series and it seemed much calmer in comparison.
I agree about head shots . Doesn't matter what we say on HF though it will have no bearing on what happens in the game itself.So we agree. Too many headshots that need to be dealt with.
Not sure why you are arguing these points on this board. No one wins a prize on here for one upmanship. Unless I am missing something.Damage? Other than Misil, who missed the first games against Windsor due to injury? And that play was just an unfortunate fall at a bad spot. Ellinas was self induced. Reid was back. How many regulars out of Kitcheners lineup in that series? Reid missed games. Misil and Ellinas out in game five. Not a lot of damage really. Christo missed a couple, Spellacy a couple and Woodall a season ender as well. The Soo series was physical. Those losses piled on to Mathurin, Belchetz and Winegard out before the series began with two of them likely season ending. That was 3 top 4 D and 2 top 6 forwards out. Who’s losses in the first series was potentially more damaging?
It's Windsor posters in general, not on the whole. Watch if one of their players takes a 5 or goodness forbid a susoension. They'll argue the exact opposite.I just find it funny that a bunch of Windsor posters thinks this is over the top. Tame compared to rnd 1
Depends on the colour of our glasses. It's not like the Spits have the market cornered on halos. We can argue all we want but it's the players on the ice playing the game not us.It's Windsor posters in general, not on the whole. Watch if one of their players takes a 5 or goodness forbid a susoension. They'll argue the exact opposite.
I don't agree. They weren't addressed last series, so I hope they don't get addressed now. If the league and refs regarding discipline are going to be crappy, just be consistently crappy. Players can adjust to consistency, wherever it lands.So we agree. Too many headshots that need to be dealt with.
I wish all would condemn headshots regardless of who we cheer for. The kids health should be priority 1. Anyway, hope for a clean, competitive game tonight.I don't agree. They weren't addressed last series, so I hope they don't get addressed now. If the league and refs regarding discipline are going to be crappy, just be consistently crappy. Players can adjust to consistency, wherever it lands.
Agreed, and I do condemn them but Hlacar wasn't a headshot imo. That was a reputation call.I wish all would condemn headshots regardless of who we cheer for. The kids health should be priority 1. Anyway, hope for a clean, competitive game tonight.
Then he chickens out of a proper fight and body slams Mercer to the ice like a coward.Nice headcheck by Nesbitt but you can't see it with blue glasses on.
Rangers haven't had a shot since half way through the period. They seem to have issues with losing coverage. Windsor can skate with any team. Hope the Rangers find their defensive game.A good start to the game followed by shooting themselves in the foot and incompetent reffing.