There have been some questionable takes over the last few pages, lol. Can we at least agree that there are compelling reasons to buy and compelling reasons to sell?
This is a good team. They're on pace for something like 105 points which would be their most since 2008, they have the league's best goaltender, and they have probably the league's second-best coach. However, they also completely lack star power beyond Parsons, frequently let bad teams hang around, have won a bunch of games in the skills competitions (8-3 in OT/SO), have few picks to trade, and are staring up at maybe the best team the OHL has seen since the Spitfires dynasty.
No one wants to just hand the championship to London. But we have to think about what brings the Rangers the greatest championship probability over multiple seasons. Some people think that's to buy today. Others think it's to sell. Folks who are advocating selling off for a third year in a row aren't enamored by pick hoarding, they just recognize that a sell-off has to happen at some point. Once it happens I'm good with trying to contend most years.
Also, for the record, since it came up, London sold off in 2008 (Mason, A Perry, etc.), 2011 (D'Orazio, De Sousa, etc.), 2015 (MacDonald, Mermis, etc.), and 2018 (Thomas, Jones, Pu, etc.). I don't think you can characterize 2022 as a sell-off; that would have meant moving Evangelista and Stranges. Maybe some Knights fans know whether Hunter explored that. It was a weird year post-COVID with a weak Western Conference, IIRC.
So London is not good EVERY year, and they aren't historically good like they are this year more than once a decade or so.