Toggle sidebar

Kitchener Rangers 2024-25 Season Thread, Part I

Fastpace

Fastpace

The Devil's Advocate in Person
Jul 25, 2015
6,498
4,535
Northern Quebec ( Abitibi Québec)
Ref Hannah said:
One last point tonight...
If there is any doubt in your minds about Little Mikey and Jussi not being development minded..
Why did Schaubel not get the nod against the worst team in the league? This is about wins and butts in seats period. Now Mike is in a corner with way too many kids. All 08s are going down. And 07s will be in the stands. It's a show. Period. Community owned business. With several huge egos steering the ship!
Click to expand...
I hope this does not break up the team chemistry, they have been doing so well, it don't take much to upset it, maybe phasing them out slowly and finding them places they can play minutes. London will also be experiencing the very same with their newcomers, what do you think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: East Avenue Bully, rangersblues and Ward Cornell

LostRangers

Registered User
Feb 1, 2023
78
181
bobber said:
Who is this " Hannah Montana" everyone speaks of? Rangers played a decent game yesterday. Jussi wasn't overly impressed in his interview. Can't imagine him being a teacher marking tests. Not every painting turns into a masterpiece. They were playing the Petes who have had their struggles this season getting a win. They do have some skilled players. Pridham played a well for his first game under a different system.
Click to expand...
I would side with Coach on the assessment of this game. First half of the game, many looked like they were playing to pad their stats rather than stick to the systems that have brought them success so far this season. This would not have been a victory against probably 75% of the league. Pretty sure they heard about it after the game..
Not sure if it was just coincidence but what was with the shoves from behind when Swick was heading off the ice. First as he was heading to the box and later in the game it was at the Rangers bench. Dangerous plays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobber
Gondrex

Gondrex

Registered User
Apr 10, 2017
575
791
Fastpace said:
I hope this does not break up the team chemistry, they have been doing so well, it don't take much to upset it, maybe phasing them out slowly and finding them places they can play minutes. London will also be experiencing the very same with their newcomers, what do you think?
Click to expand...

If there's one thing that bothers me more than that is that we reach some sort of tipping point where our GM believes that the team has enough to "go for it - Part III". We've got a few hints that at least one more player may be dropping in (remains to be seen I suppose). Are we even already past that tipping point !??

This of course would mean spending more to toughen up the back-end for any playoff run....that is unless we refuse to learn from any recent history. Besides, the talented and physical opponent in London which still has that Core Four (sorry for reusing that phrase) is now a year older.

The trading of Rehkopf, and then doing a 180 would be just bad optics in my own opinion. But I fear that there could be the temptation to grab onto that "we never anticipated the outcome of any NCAA vote" excuse.

How does that quote from George Santayana go ? ..... “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Hopefully we stay the course. In the meantime, the focus is on these upcoming games vs. London and Windsor. Should be interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: All the Answers, Rangers2022, robertmac43 and 6 others
Fastpace

Fastpace

The Devil's Advocate in Person
Jul 25, 2015
6,498
4,535
Northern Quebec ( Abitibi Québec)
Gondrex said:
If there's one thing that bothers me more than that is that we reach some sort of tipping point where our GM believes that the team has enough to "go for it - Part III". We've got a few hints that at least one more player may be dropping in (remains to be seen I suppose). Are we even already past that tipping point !??

This of course would mean spending more to toughen up the back-end for any playoff run....that is unless we refuse to learn from any recent history. Besides, the talented and physical opponent in London which still has that Core Four (sorry for reusing that phrase) is now a year older.

The trading of Rehkopf, and then doing a 180 would be just bad optics in my own opinion. But I fear that there could be the temptation to grab onto that "we never anticipated the outcome of any NCAA vote" excuse.

How does that quote from George Santayana go ? ..... “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Hopefully we stay the course. In the meantime, the focus is on these upcoming games vs. London and Windsor. Should be interesting.
Click to expand...
Strong post

The hardest thing for fans of the game, is our patience, we don't have the buttons to push, and we have to sit and watch, watch our minds deteriorating in despair. But when they win, it's all forgotten, and we are right back searching for buttons all over again. I ask, are we learning from our past?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RB76, EvenSteven, East Avenue Bully and 1 other person
Gondrex

Gondrex

Registered User
Apr 10, 2017
575
791
Fastpace said:
Strong post

The hardest thing for fans of the game, is our patience, we don't have the buttons to push, and we have to sit and watch, watch our minds deteriorating in despair. But when they win, it's all forgotten, and we are right back searching for buttons all over again. I ask, are we learning from our past?
Click to expand...

I will admit that MM is very good GM - much better than I would ever be (mind you he gets paid for doing the job), and I have learned that he has found creative ways to bring in some pieces that were seemingly from out in left field. The key though IMO is to know your enemy. The team put together last post-deadline was not adequate to beat the enemy - at least I don't think it was. Even Steven accurately pointed out the team's short comings immediately after the final trade was made - and I believe, despite eliminating Erie, he still proved to be right.

I admit a case could be made that this team is tougher than last year -Hlacar is obviously in the line-up for a reason. The question is whether or not that is enough, and if MM turns to buying instead of selling, is the talent that this team currently has and then adds onto (of course at a cost) will be enough. Maybe MM's goals are different than mine, and maybe a potential first round win is good enough for him....and I suppose there is always that possibility that Kitchener as an underdog, upsets the other team that is stronger on paper.

Older posters here may remember the NOOF. Yeah, we remember that single board - not segregated by team - where there were lots of fan vs fan arguments. But there was one level-headed, highly respected Ottawa fan by the name of Jason Cormier who I recall. His one post stuck with me. He said that if your team's top player(s) is a 17 year-old, it is highly unlikely you will win the championship (paraphrasing a bit here). I think Romano and Reid are certainly up there when you rank the talent on this team. If nothing else, they have a high impact on this team's success. So you can take from it what you will. In fairness though, we still don't know in what direction this team will go.

This is of course just one poster's 2 cents here. I of course won't jump off the fan bandwagon if MM doesn't see things the way I do :) .
 
  • Like
Reactions: rve24, RB76, All the Answers and 5 others
EvenSteven

EvenSteven

Registered User
Sep 3, 2009
7,973
7,512
There’s a lot to like about Mike MacKenzie. But like all GM’s, he has his warts. He showed some of those warts in the way he handled the last two trade deadlines.

Two years ago, he really should’ve sold. Had he sold, our draft cupboard wouldn’t be in the boat that it’s in now. (He traded away 5x2nds and 7x3rds in three major deals).

Instead, he took the gong show of a season that it was, went all in at the deadline, fired the coach, stepped behind the bench and assumed the same magic would emerge from 2017-2018. Didn’t happen. We got a week and a half of optimism sweeping Windsor. Otherwise, the entire season was a crap show.

Had he sold off assets at that deadline, (primarily Pinelli and Schmidt), we were in eighth place remember, we are likely not trading away Rehkopf this year. Add Rehkopf to this current team, and a full draft pick cupboard to tweak, and we might have something going in a weak western conference.

Last year with our empty cupboard, instead of selling like he should have, (primarily Hunter B and Sop), he did a version of standing pat where he traded for players, expected to return this year, for not much of anything. Really good trade, I suppose. But there was never a guarantee Sale was going to return and who could have predicted Savard retiring.

This year, after the Rehkopf trade, we are barely at sea level again as far as our draft pick cupboard goes. We are flush with OHL players on this roster. No need to trade for any returning players. What we need is to further strengthen our draft pick cupboard. That means at minimum trading Andonovski. Swick and/or Miseljevic as well if he can get fair value. All in pick heavy deals.

Warning!!!
After this year, we have no graduating players of any significant value to sell. We have to stick to the plan!!!

The next two years should be contending years.

WE NEED AMMO!!!!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: LostRangers, Habsrule, Gondrex and 7 others
East Avenue Bully

East Avenue Bully

Registered User
Jan 9, 2020
122
154
Only one kid drafted this year getting ice time v Sarnia that I could see.

Move some players for picks. Even if it means handing the O championship to either Saginaw or that other team west of us (problem is that they don't have a lotta picks)
 
Matttheleaf

Matttheleaf

Registered User
Apr 18, 2019
390
508
RangerNation said:
Parsons starting today vs. Sarnia. Thought this would have been an obvious start for Schaubel. Don't think he has started since Sudbury if I'm not mistaken. Can't imagine Parsons loses the start against London.
Click to expand...
He started against Owen Sound last weekend in the 2nd game of the 3 in 3. I would have started him on Friday against the Petes if they were gonna start him this weekend
 
  • Like
Reactions: East Avenue Bully
EvenSteven

EvenSteven

Registered User
Sep 3, 2009
7,973
7,512
RangerNation said:
Parsons starting today vs. Sarnia. Thought this would have been an obvious start for Schaubel. Don't think he has started since Sudbury if I'm not mistaken. Can't imagine Parsons loses the start against London.
Click to expand...
I thought Schaubel might get a start this weekend. But this is as per my pre season prediction where Parsons gets 45-50 starts this year.

Seem like if we have back to backs, they’ll give the kid a start. Otherwise…….
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fastpace

Ranger77

Registered User
Dec 29, 2014
127
220
Convincing win against Sarnia. 3 points for Pridham. What the heck happened late in the third?

Penalty
#77Justin Bottineau RoughingMinor 2:00
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#77Justin Bottineau 10-Min. Misc.Misconduct
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#85Chris Grisolia RoughingMinor 2:00
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#85Chris Grisolia 10-Min. Misc.Misconduct
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#57Trent Swick 10-Min. Misc.Misconduct
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#21Matthew Andersen RoughingMinor 2:00
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#21Matthew Andersen 10-Min. Misc.Misconduct
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#16James Barr RoughingMinor 2:00
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#16James Barr 10-Min. Misc.Misconduct
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#18Carter Kostuch InterferenceMinor 2:00Power Play
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#12Easton Wainwright RoughingMinor 2:00
3rd 17:14

Penalty
#12Easton Wainwright 10-Min. Misc.Misconduct
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X