Krangers08
Registered User
- Sep 11, 2023
- 926
- 1,115
I know London (I hate bringing them up) has been successful doing this at times. I just don't think a first year player starting at the mid point of the season is going to be very productive for his career in the long run. He's not going to get any premium ice time and likely only see spot duty. Most players develop a lot in the first half of the season, especially first year players.I love the idea/theory! That's exactly what we should be doing. Developing!! But, I'm not sure about putting a first rounder down. Optics for that aren't good. But I'm not sure it's going to matter from here on out.
Could you elaborate?The Lam/Pridham duo will be fun to watch
And I recall Juicy spending some time at one of the Maple Leaf camps?Playing for Jussi with the reputation he is building and the history of the Rangers is definitely a selling point for the picks I'm sure MM is trying to recruit right now for sure.
We don't know what Pridham was told. His dad is involved in hockey so I'm sure there was some smart discussions about the potential scenarios when he reports.
Duo? Odd verbiage!The Lam/Pridham duo will be fun to watch
I think he’ll compliment Lam’s vision and skill. plays a fast game with good edges and a solid shot.Could you elaborate?
Yes, they can use the scholarship money towards American schools but it's only up to a certain amount as specified in their agreement. TLDR: it wouldn't cost the Rangers anymore money if he goes to BU or Laurier.The OHL scholarship program….is it limited to Canadian schools? If not, could this rule change impact the costs borne by CHL teams? I.e. Pridham plays here for 2 years and then goes to BU and plays on the Ranger’s dime for the first two years. That would be more expensive than if he carried on to school north of the border.
Am I reading too much into this?
I think you are a little. They are based on a players residence. To be equivalent to the closest University.The OHL scholarship program….is it limited to Canadian schools? If not, could this rule change impact the costs borne by CHL teams? I.e. Pridham plays here for 2 years and then goes to BU and plays on the Ranger’s dime for the first two years. That would be more expensive than if he carried on to school north of the border.
Am I reading too much into this?
Thanks. I have absolutely no idea about PridhamI think he’ll compliment Lam’s vision and skill. plays a fast game with good edges and a solid shot.
I think he’ll fit well in Jussi’s systems
Just my 2 cents
I'm personally a bit skeptical too. Like I said before as long as no back room promises were made.I'm going to go back in the penalty box after this....
There is a reason Pridham is in the BCHL and not in the USHL. He just isn't good enough. His scouting report(s) tell you that. Regardless of round and dad! Sorry the draft is a bit of a DNA hunt and political monster. Buyer beware.
I'm going to go back in the penalty box after this....
There is a reason Pridham is in the BCHL and not in the USHL. He just isn't good enough. His scouting report(s) tell you that. Regardless of round and dad! Sorry the draft is a bit of a DNA hunt and political monster. Buyer beware.
Easy now! Who said anything about a full ride? Verbal commitments dont mean anything. Signing day is coming December 1st. Lets see what young Pridham signs. Hes going to BU next fall right? I'm sure he chose to move across the continent after burning it up in the CAHS?So Kent Johnson wasn’t good enough for the USHL either? Maybe the player just picked to stay in Canada and play. If you have a full ride at BU you are good enough to play in the USHL VERY easily.
I feel like only on this board can we get a free, NHL drafted player, and the majority of the conversation is concern about how much say he will have and what it will do to development and our current plan. If anything, it just makes a Swick trade more palletable. There's 0 downside imo.
I guess I'm just not making this many assumptions about MM's calculus based on one free addition. I don't know, it seems premature and unlikely to make a difference in a negative way.That is what 90% are thinking / hoping. What if this just makes MM feel this team is now a player or 2 away from competing? What if now he feels like the team is good enough and therefore holds onto Ando, Swick, Misa and Parsons? Im not saying trade them all but if the offer is too good then yes…trade them all. Eventually winning a round shouldn’t be the goal. Keeping all these players is what will get us a round or 2 this year and also decrease our chances of adding 2 or 3 really good players in mem cup year which might end up in us winning….a round or two.
MM once said something along the line of using the Knight standard operating procedure of reloading instead of rebuilding. I think when a team has the opportunity to garner a ton of assets when the opportunity is in front of them they should do what is necessary. I am sure the could care less about what I think.That is what 90% are thinking / hoping. What if this just makes MM feel this team is now a player or 2 away from competing? What if now he feels like the team is good enough and therefore holds onto Ando, Swick, Misa and Parsons? Im not saying trade them all but if the offer is too good then yes…trade them all. Eventually winning a round shouldn’t be the goal. Keeping all these players is what will get us a round or 2 this year and also decrease our chances of adding 2 or 3 really good players in mem cup year which might end up in us winning….a round or two.
In this new world (CHL / NCAA) agreement, MM may already have confirmation that a few of our flyers will report either this year or next.That is what 90% are thinking / hoping. What if this just makes MM feel this team is now a player or 2 away from competing? What if now he feels like the team is good enough and therefore holds onto Ando, Swick, Misa and Parsons? Im not saying trade them all but if the offer is too good then yes…trade them all. Eventually winning a round shouldn’t be the goal. Keeping all these players is what will get us a round or 2 this year and also decrease our chances of adding 2 or 3 really good players in mem cup year which might end up in us winning….a round or two.
if we were hoping to trade Swick for Picks, then we now have a free player plus the picks we can get in a trade.....could be a good move if you look at things that way.I feel like only on this board can we get a free, NHL drafted player, and the majority of the conversation is concern about how much say he will have and what it will do to development and our current plan. If anything, it just makes a Swick trade more palletable. There's 0 downside imo.
The old 8th to 12th round pics are now the new 2nd to 5th round picks.In this new world (CHL / NCAA) agreement, MM may already have confirmation that a few of our flyers will report either this year or next.
If that is the case, we may not be trading for assets in the 26-27 season the way we did in 2017-18 and 2022-23. Those big trade acquisitions may already be on our team. You aren’t trading for a Valentini comparable if he’s already on your team. Ditto Xu, or any other of the flyers.
So that means your cupboard doesn’t have to be overflowing. But you do acquire picks here and there when you move out excess players who have some upside, because we don’t have room for them.